Tired of ads
on this site?

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!

Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

POLITICS...Pertaining to the United States of America.

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#73

Started by tecsan [Ignore] 13,Sep,22 03:10  other posts
Your views, thoughts or simply opinions. The Economy is not well (understatement). I know there are some here that will try to link the country they are residing in as problems of the USA. Sorry the USA cannot be responsible for 100% of the problems in the world nor should they be expected to help repair all problems.

New Comment       Rating: -4  


Comments:
By phart [Ignore] 30,Oct,25 09:56 other posts 
The landlords are already loosing money because they aren't collecting rent, gee,let's tax the hell out of them!
only registered users can see external links

So now, a landlord might be forced to rent a building that is in great shape to a low end business that will do much more damage than the rent will cover to repair then either leave the place all fucked up, or stop paying rent and take months to evict. Not a good equation.

If you want to fill store fronts, reduce the cost of building materials ,maintaince and electricity cost. then the landlord can reduce the rent and still make a profit, which is the entire point of being a landlord.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 04:09 other posts 
Oh sure, stand with the landlords, not with the renters.
You gobble up all the propaganda from the wealthy they feed you.
By phart [Ignore] 01,Nov,25 18:11 other posts 
-Well if the renters would stop wasting money on rent and start OWNING things, landlord would loose any "power" liberals like you might think they have. For some reason, there again, just because someone can afford a bulding,liberals think folks should live in it free and tear it up and leave it to others to fix.

IF citys want to fix empty building problems, citys should rent the buildings and use them for shelters, and office staff. instead of doing like our local citys and let large buildings rot while they spend millions building taj mahals.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 03,Nov,25 04:36 other posts 
OMG, you are oblivious. Renters don't have the money to 'own things'.
The 'empty building problems' in cities are the result of people not being able to afford those buildings, neither for renting nor owning.

"just because someone can afford a bulding,liberals think folks should live in it free and tear it up and leave it to others to fix"
BULLSHIT! Capitalist policies have resulted in unaffordable homes and the 'empty building problems' and people are now voting for Zohran Mamdani types, because they have good ideas to force the owners to rent out their property at an affordable price.
The owners prefer to create scarcity, to leave buildings empty, to jack up the price, rather than renting them out at a reduced price. A penalty on doing that can 'fix it'.
Why can you only think in stupid straw-men? You're indoctrinated.

For a median-priced U.S. home (around $402,500) and assuming a 20% down payment + standard lending ratios, the required annual income is about US$ 118,530 (2023). That means the median family cannot afford the median house. Only 20-22% of the American families can afford the median house.

The billionaires will own more and more and everyone else will own less and less,
until you start taxing wealth significantly.

It's simple economics; what are the billionaires doing with their money?
They are BUYING 'things', that are providing them with passive income,
like houses, factories and farms.
Who are they buying from? House owners, land owners, factory owners
and farm owners.
Then those former owners are now paying rent or part of their profits,
to the new owners; the billionaires or private equity owned by billionaires.

That passive income makes the billionaires ever richer, and everyone else,
who used to own something, is now paying the billionaires to use it.
Then the billionaires have even more money to buy 'things'.
You will have trillionaires soon. They don't let those trillions go to waste in a bank,
they will BUY MORE 'THINGS'.

It's simple economics. Is it so simple that you understand it?

American family owned farms are in big trouble, due to Trump's tariffs. Bankruptcy filings specifically for family-farm restructuring (Chapter 12) are rising: 216 Chapter 12 filings in 2024, and early 2025 figures show 259 filings between April 2024–March 2025.
Then the billionaires or their private equity comes in and buys them up.
only registered users can see external links
Those farmers voted for Trump and now they are losing their farms. FAFO.


By phart [Ignore] 30,Oct,25 09:51 other posts 
Hey Cat, did your inept president do anything like this?
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 05:50 other posts 
"President Donald Trump said Thursday that his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping produced "enormous respect" between the two nations and a series of major agreements expected to benefit U.S. farmers, energy producers, and national security."

And when Trump says it, it's true.
Good for you that the US finally made up with China.
I expect all the tariff nonsense to be over now.

Of course I'm just making fun of your article. Trump has achieved nothing.
International trade and the position of China in it is worse for everyone involved
than before Trump's new stupid tariff nonsense.

"As of October 2025, clear signs the American economy is currently at risk include
a rapidly cooling labor market (downward job revisions, stalled payroll growth,
rising unemployment rate), persistent above-target inflation driven partly by tariffs,
and a significant decline in consumer confidence and spending."

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links
By tecsan [Ignore] 01,Nov,25 02:08 other posts 
We do not really give a crap about your looney socialist ideas.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 03,Nov,25 03:55 other posts 
You do, because that's why you feel the need to react.
You just cannot react with something substantial.

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links
"De-risking has caused a major shift in China's export structure away from the US"

only registered users can see external links
"Europe has belatedly sought to ‘Trump-proof’ through boosting defence investment, strengthening economic security mechanisms, and diversifying trade, including negotiations with certain Latin American countries. The UK is likewise diversifying trade – resuming talks with China and striking a deal with India."

only registered users can see external links
A working paper from Centre d’études prospectives et d’informations internationales (CEPII) models a strong “trade-war scenario” and projects that U.S. exports of goods would fall by 22.9% (in volume) compared to baseline.
A blog from Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) projects that the tariffs in effect as of September 2025 will lower U.S. GDP and reduce demand for U.S. exports.
It notes that higher U.S. tariffs raise costs for U.S. exporters (through supply-chain effects) and reduce foreign demand for U.S. exports.

The blog from the European Central Bank (ECB) mentions that U.S. tariffs push partners to re-route trade away from the U.S., implying that U.S. export growth is challenged.
only registered users can see external links
"China-US trade tensions could bring more Chinese exports and lower prices to Europe"

No one, other than your Trump propaganda outlets, is saying that Trump achieved something substantial, but they ALL recognize very negative effects on the US economy.

Despite the fanfare, China gained more than it gave in the meeting and still retains major leverage. For example:
“It came at little cost to China … Importantly … President Donald Trump never once mentioned Taiwan. That was not discussed, actually.”
While Trump stressed the deals, China’s strategic interests were largely preserved,
and China didn’t publicly commit to many of the details.

More concretely, in prior months: On May 30, 2025, Trump publicly said that China had “totally violated its agreement with us” and that he would no longer be “Mr. Nice Guy.”
In June 2025 he said Xi was “extremely hard to make a deal with” and that Beijing had reneged or stalled on a framework agreement reached in Geneva.
The “deal” Trump touted was in effect a RETURN to pre-escalation tariff levels
(so little changed) and possibly tilted TOWARDS China.

Analysts say that China mostly got a tariff truce and preserved its key policy positions (e.g., around Taiwan or rare-earth export power) while giving less.
In other words: Trump lost again.

TACO: Trump Always Chickens Out.


By Fatlinesandbeer [Ignore] 02,Nov,25 15:31 other posts 
Trump is the man!
By leopoldij [Ignore] 02,Nov,25 21:19 other posts 
He's the representative of the radical left .
By phart [Ignore] 02,Nov,25 22:06 other posts 
He is causing heartburn for all democrats and liberals. Voting for him was kinda like making a batch of Exlax brownies and putting them out for the class bully to eat. So refreshing!


By Mongo [Ignore] 01,Nov,25 19:20 other posts 
Mama no get ebt no more after Orange man say bye bye. Mama they take Mongo neice Broccoli for free Arbys kids meal but broccoli old and mama older poor mama.


By tecsan [Ignore] 30,Oct,25 02:58 other posts 
Damn I love it...I believe 14 boats being blown to hell, oh one was a submarine used as a fishing boat as the democrats will try to claim.


By tecsan [Ignore] 06,Oct,25 03:28 other posts 
What is it? 4 boats blown to hell, I think.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Oct,25 04:03 other posts 
The government killing people, in open waters, without any evidence of any crime,
and you don't even know how many there were anymore. Do you like that?

The government sending the military into the streets and putting snipers on rooftops,
to keep 'the peace'.

Remember, when people put Republicans out of power, Democrats can do this too.
If you ever try a Jan 6th again, the military can shoot everyone. Agreed?

Don't cry when they put you in the Fascist re-education camp.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Oct,25 11:57 other posts 
Our governement is taking the war on drugs to the place they come from
These boats are not getting blown up willy nilly, i am sure they have enough info to make a good decision.
Of course the dope dealers with all their money and influence and fear mongering are going to make it sound like a group of innocent fisherman were in a speed boat flying out into open waters for a bigger fish.
Liberals will fall for any lie that supports their cause and supports their hatred for America .
Europe enjoys seeing death and despair here in the US brought by dope. it helps to keep their citizens, I mean subjects, in a tighter grip by the government
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Oct,25 18:35 other posts 
There are already stories from grieving widows calling it bullshit.

It's murder, plain and simple. One of the 273 reasons to impeach him.
There is just no use, because 0 Republicans will ever vote to impeach.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 06,Oct,25 19:35 other posts 
I searched how they know if those are drug boats, the technology the coast guard has zooming in on what’s in the boat from ten miles away is amazing. I watched the video of how they warned the boats to stop with the very loud speaker system they have, you can see the bundles of coke or pot in the boats, the boats don’t have the proper license to be there, no markings on the boat ect… there avoiding by zigzagging because they know how the missle system works at a boat going 50 knots, and what I read about what they are allowed to do is good enough for me… and remember, I’m not for trump, but I igree with what he’s doing to keep drugs off our street, wasn’t it you that said in a pryer post that our country is drug infested,,, well I want it stopped and if it means blowing those drug runners out of the water, so be it.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Oct,25 19:52 other posts 
Did they present that evidence for all of these attacks?
In any case, even if they actually have drugs in the boat, as long as they
don't enter American waters, they are not yours to act against.
Also, smuggling drugs is not a capital offense.

The Trump regime is breaking many laws, plain and simple.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Oct,25 21:48 other posts 
but the killing those drugs will do IS a capital offense.
I can't believe you support drug dealers instead of citizens who are being killed by drugs. shheeeeh, and I thought you had a ounce of humanity?.
By dgraff [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 07:31 other posts 
He don’t care he hates Americans
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 06:02 other posts 
You are not real Americans. People who STILL support Trump are TRAITORS.

How many times have you pledged allegiance "to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."?

You guys don't give a shit about liberty and justice for all.
You are fucking TRAITORS to America.

If you start about the "under God" part, adding that in 1954 was treason too,
to the First Amendment.
By dgraff [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 06:36 other posts 
How about you kiss my ass and call it a love story
As i told you before you have enough fucked up thing’s going on in your own country too worry about the United States 🇺🇸 is doing just fine
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 06:59 other posts 
I can walk and chew bubblegum at the same time.
I'm speaking out against fascism everywhere.

No, the US is doing far from fine.
By phart [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 10:44 other posts 
we are doing fine, day 13 of government shut down and i didn't notice a damn thing different when i went to town this morning. been away from the computer nearly 5 days and came home and all was the same.
We are doing fine.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 17,Oct,25 15:26 other posts 
Sure, you don't have a government job.
Just because you don't see it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
This is applicable to a whole lot of things you deny the existence of.
By tecsan [Ignore] 16,Oct,25 03:44 other posts 
You are the TRAITOR. As dgraff said, you hate America, especially our values.

I truly hope we blow the shit out of more boats bringing poison into our Country.

I do have a better idea, maybe we could get them to turn around and bring that shit to your little country.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 16,Oct,25 10:55 other posts 
Damn fool, it's impossible for me to be a traitor to America,
because I'm not an American.

I defend my own Constitution, you shit on yours.

Your American values are LIBERAL values, defined by your founding fathers.
You have them rolling over in their graves at 10,000 RPM.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 19,Oct,25 11:02 other posts 
Not to put a fine point on it, but, I am an American, and I totally agree with Ananas2xLekker. You guys are the antithesis of what being an American is all about. You guys make me ashamed to say people like you are part of MY America. And Dgraff is one of the worst.
By dgraff [Ignore] 19,Oct,25 15:44 other posts 
Thank you no one is holding you hostage you are free to leave anytime go cry with woopie gold berg I’m here to stay and so are the republicans
By CAT52! [Ignore] 19,Oct,25 20:07 other posts 
That's our cross to bear, but, why should I leave and let you gangsters destroy my country? I will fight you even if my only weapon is my words and my vote.
By dgraff [Ignore] 19,Oct,25 22:54 other posts 
You should quit voting all the years you been voting and you never got it right yet
By CAT52! [Ignore] 20,Oct,25 07:21 other posts 
Some people believe the earth is flat and what you believe is just as dumb.
By Cunt_Man [Ignore] 20,Oct,25 00:36 other posts 
Last time I checked my birth cerficate says united states of america.. Yeah I'm american and I voted for trump..and
venezuala was the right things to do. What gives you the fucking gaul saying there is no evidence?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 22,Oct,25 03:43 other posts 
You understand me, you're just trying to be cute.

All the people that Trump is calling anti-American have birth certificates
saying they are US citizens too.

There IS no evidence, just your regime saying shit.
If you blow up boats and all the people, into very tiny pieces,
you're also destroying the evidence. I think that's deliberate.

It also doesn't matter. Your party called itself the party of law and order.
This is breaking the law, whether you like it or not.
If you want the law to be there when you need it, defend it.
By Cunt_Man [Ignore] 22,Oct,25 04:02 other posts 
Actually no on all counts.. It's interesting you call me part of a regime that believes in democracy. That's typical coming from a socialist. Thre is no reasoning with you so its your nickel while I take in points.

Gas prices have jumped down considerably. Hamas is dead in the water. N. Korea is not threatening nuclear war. Iran is dead in the water but they have big mouths which is the obly thing running for them. Tawain is safe for the moment while china is going bankrupt trump is scheduled to go out there and make deals ending the war in ukraine because without china USSR is dead i the water.

I voted for him for this reason. Israel is not under attack for the longest length of time I've ever seen.. Russia ukraine will end one way oo the other.. There doesn't need to be any proof presented here as far as Venezuela.. The democrats don't even talk about that at all.. The national guard is throwing out illegal immigrants with ICE.. They don't belong here.. Period.. with that said the democrat party with its raping citizens off of money is done.. No illegals in country? No democratic party, no deep state..

You have no idea what you are talking about.. Thank you drive though..
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Oct,25 05:26 other posts 
"It's interesting you call me part of a regime that believes in democracy."
A writing error? Your country believes in democracy, YOU DO NOT.
Your president doesn't believe in democracy either. He wants to destroy it.

You still support Trump after he committed an insurrection.
It's your duty as a citizen to defend your Constitution.
I assume you pledged allegiance (to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all) many times. That republic is based on The Constitution.
Republicans have claimed to support The Constitution, for decades.
That is your side saying that supporting The Constitution is being an American.

Now you are supporting a president who should have never been elected in the first place, but who should also be in prison for treason.

You can think saying "socialist" is an argument, but it's not.
All party programs are assessed by our 'Rule of Law Committee'. My Socialist Party's program has the most Constitutional program of all 18 assessed parties.
The right-wing parties are all violating our Constitution.
You are NOT reasoning, stop fooling yourself.



Everything else you are saying is not applicable. Even if Trump would be the best president ever, he is still a traitor who should have never been elected the second time.
It doesn't make you "American" to support low gas prices or by supporting Israel.

The national guard being sent into American cities, against their will, is Anti-American to the core. How about those state's rights, you are always crying about?

It's not about crime, because Trump is pardoning tons of criminals, rapists and pe.do.philes. He's also pardoning the most corrupt politician ever. It all shows you who he identifies with, and you couldn't care less.

Trump is accusing many American citizens of being Anti-American, for not supporting HIM. The opposite is true. Supporting a traitor to America is Anti-American.

Besides the insurrection, the conspiracy to defraud the American voter, the stealing of classified documents, the r@pe, the hiding of his prostitute visits with campaign money, the corruption with Elon Musk and letting Elon Musk meddle your Congress approved government funding, Trump never stopped breaking the law. Below is a list. It's Anti-American to support a president and his administration breaking the law that clearly and consistently. You utter disrespect for law and order is sickening, and the hypocrisy makes it even worse.

Then there is the clear move to fascism. Liberals and lefties already warned about Project 25 being authoritarian, but Trump denied any association with it, because it had 5% support of the American voters. It was clear he was lying, but your side kept lying with him. Now, Project 25 is over 60% implemented and they are working hard for 100%. Besides that, Trump has been demonstrating every characteristic of an authoritarian. That's everything The Constitution was designed to prevent, by your founding fathers

If you even address these point at all, you will just deny, deflect, or make excuses.

In any case, it's bullshit to say that I have no idea what I'm talking about, because all these point are verified by at least 50% of Americans. Only MAGA is denying them, without good reason, and that side is getting smaller by the day. The majority of Americans want him gone. I'm with them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Violation of Constitutional Duties (subject of House impeachments / official findings):
• Abuse of Power / Soliciting Foreign Interference (Ukraine phone call) — House impeachment (Article: abuse of power); allegation that the president solicited a foreign government to interfere in a U.S. election to benefit his campaign. (Impeachment / House finding; not convicted by Senate)
• Obstruction of Congress / Defiance of Congressional Subpoenas (Ukraine inquiry and other congressional investigations) — House cited obstruction-of-Congress behavior for withholding documents and directing executive branch noncooperation with subpoenas. (Impeachment / House finding; not criminally convicted for that act)
• Incitement of Insurrection / Failure to Faithfully Execute Office (Jan. 6 events) — House of Representatives impeached the president for “incitement of insurrection” tied to January 6, 2021 and related efforts to block certification of the 2020 election; the allegation is that the president’s words and conduct foreseeably encouraged violent attempts to obstruct the constitutional process. (Impeachment / House finding; Senate acquitted)
• Undermining the Rule of Law via Interference with DOJ and Special Counsels — Credible allegations that the president repeatedly attempted to influence, pressure, or replace Department of Justice officials or special counsels to affect investigations (examples include public and private pressure on DOJ/AG officials and statements about firing prosecutors/special counsels). (Allegation; documented by contemporaneous reporting, testimony, and filings)
• Violation(s) of the Emoluments Clauses (foreign and domestic) — Multiple lawsuits and legal complaints alleged that accepting benefits from foreign and domestic entities (hotels, foreign state visits, payments) violated the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses by receiving gifts/benefits from foreign states and domestic entities while in office. (Civil lawsuits filed; courts addressed standing and other issues; allegations considered credible in legal analysis though results varied)
• Failure to “Take Care” / Abuse of Office via Conditioning Federal Benefits/Resources for Political Aims — Allegations that certain actions (e.g., withholding funds, leveraging federal resources, or conditioning official acts) were at odds with the constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws and office; raised in congressional investigations and legal/policy analyses. (Allegation; documented in testimony and records)

Law violations proven in court (criminal convictions, civil findings & judgments, jury verdicts or plea agreements):
• Donald J. Trump — Criminal conviction (New York County): 34 counts of first-degree falsifying business records (hush-money / Stormy Daniels scheme) — Jury verdict finding guilty on 34 counts (May 30, 2024). (Criminal conviction — jury)
• The Trump Organization (corporate entities) — Criminal conviction (New York) — Convicted of multiple corporate crimes including tax-related offenses; company fined and corporate liability entered following trial (December 2022). (Corporate criminal conviction — jury/verdict)
• Allen Weisselberg (Trump Organization CFO) — Guilty plea / conviction (New York) — Pled guilty to multiple counts of tax fraud and related offenses (plea August 2022); cooperated/testified. (Guilty plea / conviction)
• Stephen K. Bannon — Criminal conviction (contempt of Congress) — Convicted for criminal contempt for defying a House Jan. 6 committee subpoena; sentenced to jail (conviction July 2022; sentence imposed; sentence later served). (Criminal conviction — jury/verdict/sentence)

Civil judgments & jury findings (monetary awards, findings of liability):
• E. Jean Carroll — civil jury findings & damages against Donald J. Trump (defamation / sexual-abuse findings) — Jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation in related civil suits; juries awarded multi-million dollar damages (multiple trials; combined awards and judicial findings). (Civil jury findings — damages awarded)
• New York State (Letitia James) — civil fraud judgment against Donald J. Trump, Trump Organization, and related defendants — State court judge found defendants liable for business fraud and ordered disgorgement/monetary penalties and corporate remedies (Feb 2024 decision and subsequent judgment orders). (Civil judgment — state court; judgment and remedies ordered though appeals followed)

Law violations under active investigation or subject to unresolved indictments/charges (open or paused prosecutions, indictments not yet resulting in final conviction):
• Federal Special Counsel (classified documents / Mar-a-Lago) — Indictment and criminal charges filed by special counsel alleging unlawful retention of classified documents, obstruction and related counts; case saw motions, appeals, and at certain points was paused or motions to dismiss were litigated; status shifted with post-election prosecutorial decisions. (Federal indictment / special counsel investigation — ongoing or paused/appealed depending on docket developments)
• Federal Special Counsel (Jan. 6 / election-related federal case) — Indictment(s) alleging obstruction of a joint session of Congress, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and related counts tied to the January 6 events and efforts to overturn the 2020 election; charges were brought by the Special Counsel; litigation and challenges to prosecutorial authority and immunity were part of the record. (Federal indictment / investigation — active or in litigation)
• Fulton County, Georgia (state RICO / election interference indictment) — State indictment in Fulton County alleging racketeering and related offenses connected to efforts to overturn Georgia’s 2020 election results; procedural litigation included challenges to the prosecutor’s participation (disqualification motions), pauses, and appeals; some co-defendants pleaded guilty while main defendants (including Trump) had filings/pleas of not guilty pending reassignment of prosecution in some phases. (State indictment / investigation — active but subject to procedural rulings and reassignment)
• Other state and local investigations by attorneys general, US Attorneys, and civil litigants — Various inquiries and civil enforcement actions (e.g., financial-disclosure and business practice probes, investigations into campaign finances, and separate state/county investigations) remained open or in litigation in multiple jurisdictions. (Multiple active investigations / civil enforcement matters)

Documented and credible law violations (well-documented allegations, sworn testimony, admissions, or factual findings that are credible but not necessarily criminal convictions):
• Payments and reimbursements connected to the Stormy Daniels matter and related bookkeeping entries — Documented in trial evidence and testimony (Michael Cohen testimony, bank and accounting records); resulted in criminal charges and the New York conviction noted above. (Documented; led to criminal conviction in New York)
• Repeated misstatements of asset values on financial statements used to obtain loans/insurance — Alleged in State AG civil case and found in part by a state court judge as fraudulent business practices (Letitia James civil case). (Documented & judicial finding in civil context)
• Extensive documented contacts, communications, and alleged coordination with state election officials, operatives, and lawyers regarding post-2020 election strategies — Supported by contemporaneous records, call logs, emails, and testimony (used in investigations and indictments). (Documented in filings and investigative records; relevant to racketeering/election-related probes)
• Public and private statements and communications that contradict sworn testimony or contemporaneous records (e.g., disputes over what was said or done in particular meetings/phone calls) — Documented in testimony and contemporaneous notes (e.g., White House and national security staff notes, transcripts of calls) and used as factual support in congressional inquiries. (Documented; used as evidence in impeachment and investigatory processes)
• Serial use of executive or administrative actions that legal analysts concluded posed real legal or ethical violations (conflicts of interest; use of official acts to benefit private businesses; mixing official travel/events with personal business) — Documented in reporting, ethics complaints, and legal analyses; several civil suits and complaints raised these issues. (Documented & credible; varied legal outcomes in courts)
By Cunt_Man [Ignore] 24,Oct,25 18:17 other posts 
Are you finished?
This is all fake crap

I'll try not to be too complicated.democracy is not perfect but what distinguishes democracy and socialism is democracy strives for perfection while socialism remains dormant to itself not only destroying itself but to everythng it touches it destroys.

There are 2 typs of people. One person tries to unify in an altruistic state while socialism has an empty hole where no motter what it steals from it will never be satisfied.

So far with all of your plagueing propaganda the only thing I have seen from you is your egoism.. You remain isolated and unimportant. Eventually evil eventually dies, just like socialism which is based on materiaalsist agendas.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 07:17 other posts 
How easy it is to believe whatever you want, if you can just call everything "fake" that doesn't fit your narrative. It's lazy and dishonest.

You're a waste of time.

Why facts dont change minds (goose explains)
only registered users can see external links
When people kill people with guns, you say
"Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

So why is there no responsibility for people to not do drugs?
"Drugs don't kill people, people who take too much of them kill themselves."

I don't support drug dealers, I want to take them out of business.
Legalize, tax and regulate some of them, ban the most dangerous drugs.
I support those policies, BECAUSE THEY WORK. Your policies DON'T.
By dgraff [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 06:43 other posts 
Business is booming in the gun shops in the United States they can’t keep them on the shelves we the people are arming ourselves our military is not the largest armed force the civilians are
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 06:52 other posts 
I believe that. Liberals and lefties have some catching up to do.
If I was living in your country, I would be stocking up too.
Mass shootings are not the highest priority, if fascists are gearing up.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 01:03 other posts 
The U.S. takes action against drug trafficking in international waters primarily through the U.S. Coast Guard, which has legal authority under both U.S. and international laws. This is accomplished through intelligence-driven interdictions, multilateral cooperation, and targeted enforcement against vessels without clear nationality.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 19,Oct,25 11:08 other posts 
Cody8789, taking action and committing murder in the high seas are two totally different things. Tell me, why are cops sent to prison, for using excessive force up to and including death, here, in the States? Found guilty by a jury of their peers? Yet, according to you, murder of people who have not been indicted, let alone found guilty, is ok?
My America, my Constitution, does not agree with you. 👿👿
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 18:31 other posts 
I tried to put the post where I wanted but it slid way down here so forget it
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 18:33 other posts 
.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 12:26 other posts 
Cody, I, too want to keep illicit drugs out of our country, but, I believe this is not the way to do it. This is the maritime law from the UN treaty that we are part of.

“UN Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (198: This is the primary international treaty governing the interdiction of drug smugglers at sea. It establishes a framework for cooperation between states and authorizes actions such as boarding and seizing vessels suspected of drug trafficking, provided they have the consent of the flag state.
Flag State Consent: A fundamental principle is the requirement for consent from the flag state of the vessel before a boarding or interdiction can occur in international waters.”

Check out the last sentence. These boats are operating from Venezuela supposedly, but, is this verifiable? I believe that if we can destroy them from the air, then we can shadow them until the Coast Guard can intercept them on the water. This is a political stunt to show how tough the Clown is.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 14:00 other posts 
The boats are too fast for our coast guard, once these speed boats know there being followed they go into a neutral port where our boats and planes cannot go. We cannot enter another countries border within five miles off there shore, then we lose them. So we either try to stop them in international waters or destroy them before they are able to get to, say Cuban waters where we cannot go. These drugs are killing our people including our young children, I’m all for killing five drug runners to save just one American life.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 16:03 other posts 
By CAT52! [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 17:31 other posts 
Ok, let me see if I understand this. According to you these boats suddenly appear on the high seas and without any proof that they are drug runners, they are attacked and killed. So, how did the air force know the smugglers would be at that time and place? You think they might have Intel? But, if so, why couldn't the Coast Guard wait there? I'm pretty sure that no matter how fast those boats are, they couldn't outrun a machine gun bullet.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 18:28 other posts 
Ok, let's see if I can get my crayons and try to draw a picture for you.
America decided they wanted Osama ben laden dead. so people went out into the world posing as someone they weren't, you know,acting ,undercover. so they could get close to where he was. Since these people were operating secretly no one but a chosen few knew who they were and where they were for safety. They work for the government. so they report to someone in the government, They see bin laden and let someone know where. then someone else goes in and shoots him.

OK now back to this drug boat thing. Americans, or other people working for the US government, are posing as fisherman or bar tenders or taxi drivers or something ,down there in venzwalla and they report back what they see, then someone else confirms it with a satellite camera or other means .this info gets sent to someone flying a aero plane carrying some bad shit that goes BOOOOOM! and drops in on the boats saw earlier and the dope is GONE. They can't get on the news and say, "Ok Lady in Florida or Man in The Nether regions of Europe, sam Johnson took this photo graph of the dope in this boat yesterday at 4 pm. Pilot Jack swaki dropped ordnance from a f16 jet and blew it up." it would kinda give away their source of info and get someone hurt or killed.
By dgraff [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 07:47 other posts 
Your smoking crack lady
The only reason you could want drug smuggling boats to get to our coast is if you’re hiding a drug habit are you
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 09:43 other posts 
Look, you guys can say what you want, but, these boats couldn’t come close to reaching the Florida Keys where they were destroyed. Your argument about me wanting illegal drugs to reach our shores is dumb, but, this is the truth. Check the locations. It happened in the southern Caribbean close to Venezuela. For those of you too ignorant where that is, it’s just north OF SOUTH AMERICA.

“ Following an executive order in August 2025, the U.S. military, acting on the orders of President Donald Trump, carried out multiple strikes on alleged drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean Sea. Most of the known strikes occurred in international waters off the coast of Venezuela.
Key details of the strikes
Locations: The attacks took place in the southern Caribbean Sea, in international waters near the coast of Venezuela. This area falls under the responsibility of the U.S. Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM).
Targeting: The U.S. military targeted small, high-speed boats, which the Trump administration alleged were trafficking illicit narcotics and operated by "narco-terrorists" and Venezuelan criminal groups like the Tren de Aragua gang.
Timeline: Multiple fatal strikes were announced by President Trump or War Secretary Pete Hegseth during September and October 2025.
September 2: The U.S. conducted the first strike, which reportedly killed 11 people.
September 15/16: A second strike killed three people on a vessel allegedly departing from Venezuela.
September 19: A third strike targeted another vessel, killing three more individuals.
October 3: A fourth boat was hit off the Venezuelan coast, killing four people.
Justification: President Trump and his administration stated that the lethal military force was an act of self-defense, aimed at stopping the flow of fentanyl and other narcotics into the United States. Following the strikes, the administration also declared the U.S. to be in a "non-international armed conflict" with drug cartels.
Controversy and criticism: The strikes have been met with criticism from congressional Democrats, legal experts, and human rights groups.
Critics argue the strikes lack legal precedent and congressional authorization.
Some lawmakers have called the actions an illegal use of military force against suspected criminals.
The administration has provided little evidence to prove that the targeted vessels were carrying drugs or that they posed an imminent threat to the U.S..
Some evidence suggests at least one targeted boat may have been turning around before it was struck.”

IT WAS WRONG. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE A COUNTRY OF LAWS. WE FOUGHT FOR INDEPENDENCE TO BE GOVERNED BY LAWS. WE FOUGHT AND LOST MANY GOOD MEN IN MANY WARS TO PRESERVE THAT HERITAGE. THIS? THIS IS COWBOY STUFF AND YOU GUYS ARE SUPPORTING MORE ILLEGAL STUFF ON TOP OF WHAT THIS CLOWN IS ALREADY GUILTY OFF. SHAME ON YOU. 👿
By dgraff [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 10:10 other posts 
Oh bull shit since when did you become mother Teresa you don’t give a damn about the people or their rights you’re only bitching because trumps kicking ass and taking names and that’s exactly why I voted for him and that’s exactly why I campaigned for him and that’s why he’s our president
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 12:52 other posts 
The Clown kicking ass? 🤣🤣🤣👍🏼
By phart [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 22:14 other posts 
I worked with a retired coast guard member and he got me on 1 of their ships and I will say this, they might out run the engines~ but if they ever pulled the canvas off that damn big ass gun they had on there, bye bye boat! but it is a ALOT of paper work if you fire it. SO they try everything else first.
By dgraff [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 07:42 other posts 
You tell her Cody
She needs to take her clouded democrat glasses off and see things for what they are
Get the druggies off our streets by what ever means possible
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 09:52 other posts 
Cody, how would you feel if some country came close to Florida and shot up some American speed boat on it’s way to Bimini and killed all on board? If they thought it was running drugs to the Bahamas, according to international law and the example of the Clown, it would be okay.
No, Cody, make it legal and then it’s okay. That means that even lawbreakers have rights. And if not, then none of us have rights.

The right of habeas corpus is a legal remedy that protects a prisoner's right to challenge the lawfulness of their detention. It's a court order that compels a custodian to produce a prisoner before the court to determine the cause of their detention. The prisoner can then indicate if their right to fair trial was violated.
Origins The concept originated in the 1200s as part of the Magna Carta.
US Constitution Article I, Section 9, paragraph 2 of the US Constitution guarantees the right of habeas corpus, but allows suspension during invasion or rebellion if public safety requires it.
Application An imprisoned, arrested, or detained person, or any citizen with political rights, can apply for a habeas corpus order.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 17:32 other posts 
Well what I have seen, I watched the videos and the closeup on those boats that were running and I’m satisfied that they were drug boats, the telescopic of those helicopters were so amazing you can almost see the color of those guys eyes it was so powerful. I’m 100% convinced they were drug running and I also seen the bales of coke in the boat, so to bad for them, I don’t like anyone dying but they refused to stop, and if they were innocent they would have stopped.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 20:54 other posts 
An agile helicopter? And they needed a missile? What, our military doesn't provide machine guns on gunships? Right.🤣🤣
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 22:08 other posts 
Our coast guard boats can’t keep up with those drug runner boats, there too fast, over 50 knots, and by the time we would be able to put a fast boat on the water to catch them, there gone. What I liked even better was I watched a helicopter take four shots, one at a time from a special rifle that can hit a fast moving target one engine at a time until the boat was dead in the water and all that coke went overboard and sunk by the time the coast guard got there. I rather see them dead so when they get out of jail in a year, they won’t be hauling coke laced with fentanyl again.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 06:37 other posts 
Ever heard of helicopters? They could shoot out the outboard engines.
If they can blow up the boat with a missile, they can disable it or force it to stop.

If they trow out the dope, it would be ON VIDEO. We have SEEN it blow up.

Instead they blow up the evidence and expect everyone to trust them.
Fuck that, your lying regime has ZERO CREDIBILITY LEFT.
The US might be worse liars than Russia now.
By phart [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 10:47 other posts 
No, we are better off than russia on that front,
What is the drug addiction rate in Russia?
The level of drug abuse in the Russian Federation remains high and according to official statistics of the Russian Federal Ministry of Health and Social Development, the number of registered users of illicit drugs is more than half a million (517,389

Now china on the other hand,
What is the penalty for drugs in China?
China is incredibly tough on drug manufacturers and traffickers. Anyone found with more than a kilogram of opium or 50 grams of heroin is sentenced to death

NOW THAT is drug control.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Oct,25 03:22 other posts 
It's a problem when you like authoritarian regimes for their authoritarianism.
There is no need for authoritarianism to keep drugs under control.
Healthy and happy people usually don't get addicted to drugs.
That the US has such a drugs problem is because life in the US SUCKS,
for most people. Your solution is making life in the US suck WORSE.
By phart [Ignore] 15,Oct,25 08:07 other posts 
There is a very simple but big problem with your statement.

"keep drugs under control". There should be no "control" over illegal drugs ,they should be ELIMINATED.

Your theory is sadly in use in regards to fire ants in our country, control them, everything that would get RID of the bastards is illegal. so we have folks getting bit all the time that are allergic.

Drug control has not worked in this country, judges play paddy cake with the dealers, the users are treated like they have the flu and are turned back out as soon as they can walk and the problem never gets better.

Oh, and i am not agreeing with authoritarianism, just some of the same ideas, similar to how you dodge agreeing with socialism.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 17,Oct,25 10:09 other posts 
Funny how you're a complete individualist and proponent of personal responsibility on almost every issue, except on the issue of consuming some chemicals or biological agent to experience some temporary buzz, with the risk of getting addicted. Why isn't this people's own responsibility? It cannot be the harm to society, because you support lots of other issues that are dependent on people's personal responsibility for it to not harming society.

Fire ants are a part of nature. They were here before humanity, and they serve an important role in the balance of nature. Find a way to co-exist with them.

Which ideas of authoritarianism do you not agree with?
I see Trump agreeing with all of them. Below is a complete list of characteristics of authoritarianism. They all fit Trump like a glove, and I've never seen you disagree with Trump on anything. You only argue against them with whataboutisms, but never by disagreeing with Trump when he clearly represents them or moves towards them.

Since when do I dodge agreeing with socialism? I AM a socialist.
What I do not agree with is your ignorant straw-man of socialism.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complete and commonly accepted set of authoritarian traits:
- Concentration of executive power (weak checks and balances).
- Erosion of the rule of law (selective enforcement, immunity for loyalists).
- Weak or manipulated elections (e.g., delegitimizing results, changing rules).
- Suppression or delegitimization of opposition (political parties, movements, critics).
- Restriction of civil liberties (press, speech, association).
- Delegitimization or erosion of independent institutions (courts, civil service).
- Use of state power to entrench incumbency (patronage, coercion, legal manipulation).
- Dehumanization of opponents / nationalist or exclusionary rhetoric.
- Glorification of “strong leaders” / personalist rule.
- Exceptionalism or “higher cause” justification (e.g. “If it saves the nation, anything is allowed”).
- Militarization or paramilitary tolerance (use or endorsement of violence to achieve political goals).
- Attacks on electoral legitimacy / peaceful transition of power.
- Control or co-optation of the bureaucracy, judiciary, and media.
- Undermining of factual truth and creation of a controlled narrative.
By tecsan [Ignore] 16,Oct,25 03:54 other posts 
Where is the authoritarian regime now? You know the previous administration that hated America as much as you.

Oh, little idiot where are them drugs going to go if they get blown to hell coming here?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 16,Oct,25 10:59 other posts 
You are supporting it!

Your previous administration defended and protected your Constitution.
You are supporting treason.
By tecsan [Ignore] 18,Oct,25 02:31 other posts 
Like you supported the libtard regime (biden and cumala). We know how you think idiot.

The biden regime was a total failure, he had no idea what was going on. Guess you like a one libtard leadership (you know who).

Besides someone that hates America has no voice. You are from a tiny country that really has no effect on the rest of the world. Sorry to burst your bubble.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 19,Oct,25 12:43 other posts 
The "libtard regime" isn't breaking the law 24/7,
nor are they pissing on The Constitution.

The Biden administration was democratically elected,
and acted democratically the whole term of Biden.
They pulled your country out of the Covid crisis.
Trump was elected due to him lying 24/7 and cheating.
There is also good evidence that they rigged election machines to help him win. He should have already been sent to prison for his attempt to steal the election, but this is another crime that he should be investigated for. Then he needs to go to prison, with all his conspirators.

You cannot name anything real that would make the Biden a failure.
If you say 'inflation', thinking that's an argument, Trump is WORSE.
Also, Biden didn't cause that high inflation, Trump IS causing it now.
Trump made the dollar drop 10% in nine months. That's the fastest drop since George W. Bush's first administration (2001-2005), where the dollar fell by over 40% relative to the euro from its peak in October 2000.
Republicans are fuck-ups, all of them, and Trump is the worst.

Your last paragraph is utterly irrelevant, idiot. It doesn't make a difference for Trump being an utter fool and criminal.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 19,Oct,25 20:09 other posts 
That's total BS. Why don't you educate yourself on the vastness of the Caribbean?
By phart [Ignore] 20,Oct,25 06:33 other posts 
i don't care how big it is, get rid of the dope.
Narco subs are going to be the new thing now i bet.
I just read that Trump is going to cut money off from columbia because of drugs. GOOD. They can fix their own drug problem or starve
By CAT52! [Ignore] 20,Oct,25 07:23 other posts 
Narco subs have been around since the 80's
By phart [Ignore] 20,Oct,25 09:33 other posts 
yep, and will become more popular now.so hence the need for US ships in international waters to detect them and "boom".
By CAT52! [Ignore] 21,Oct,25 12:03 other posts 
Most illegal drugs are smuggled into the U.S. through official land ports of entry, primarily along the U.S.-Mexico border. Trafficking organizations exploit the high volume of daily cross-border traffic to conceal narcotics in vehicles and commercial cargo

US ships have always patrolled the high seas for smuggling and/or criminal acts. What we are NOT supposed to do is kill people indiscriminately.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Oct,25 21:54 other posts 
Like I said, of course the folks there are not going to admit their family was dope haulers. and a few folks crying on tv, could convince most anyone that they were right.
As big of a rabbit hole as this can cause America to go down, I don't think they would have started doing this without just cause and very good evidence.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 16:08 other posts 
I’ve seen the evidence and videos
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 06:27 other posts 
Present the evidence. Is it anything like Bush had on the WMDs?
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 07,Oct,25 21:31 other posts 
All fishing boats require a transponder and registration number on the hull of the boat, without this you are in violation in international waters. Larger boats require an ais system to be recognized by a digital receiver.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Oct,25 08:33 other posts 
Colombia's president says boat struck by US was carrying Colombians - BBC News
only registered users can see external links


Whoops
By tecsan [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 03:49 other posts 
Do you really expect them to tell the truth...How fucking ignorant.

Have you not seen the libtards and all their shit for about the past 10 yrs. Hell, their lying bullshit goes back a lot farther than that.

So predictable, when in doubt libtards LIE.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 07:01 other posts 
No. You guys assume we lie. What you can't provide is proof. On the other hand, we can provide plenty of proof where you lie.
I take the word of almost every other world leader, over the word of Trump.
By phart [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 08:13 other posts 
so what else besides dope and columbians would a boat from columbia be toting???

east africans?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 10:47 other posts 
Fish, people? Opps, that last one doesn’t count. They have no rights so they are ok to murder.
By phart [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 12:01 other posts 
you missed the point. Why would there be anything else that was legit on a boat leaving columbia? there is no reason.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 12:16 other posts 
Are you listening to what you are saying? I live in South Florida, Miami to be exact. Have you any idea how many fast boats are out in the Gulf Stream on any given day? Do you know that anyone of those could be drug runners? And, Colombia is a modern country with plenty of affluent people who own boats. There are plenty of reasons for boats to be in the water off of its shores, but, you missed the ACTUAL point. Without proof, even visual proof, it’s murder.
--------------------------------------- added after 28 seconds

Even then……well.
By phart [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 14:35 other posts 
Again, what kind of proof could be shown to the public that would not jeopardize the operation?
People are working undercover in that shit hole country right now risking life and limb to try to find out where the shit is coming from and where it is going and how it is getting there.
The government can't just get on the news and tell everything.
As controversial as this is, I seriously doubt there is much disputing the evidence if we had access to it.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 15:10 other posts 
How about a bunch of pot or coke bails unloaded in a port?but that's not the point. How would you feel if you were a drug dealer driving on a North Carolina road and suddenly, without warning, you were shot up by several cops with semi automatic weapons ?
By phart [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 19:05 other posts 
if you are a drug dealer, you are aware that is part of the job you chose. Just as a cop has to have enough sense to know being shot at is part of the job, so does the drug dealer.

Were you upset when Bonnie and Clyde were ambushed and killed without a court trial?
Were you this upset when that poor UPS driver died in your state a few years ago, most likely by cops bullets, without a trial?

Stop being a hypocrite.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 27,Oct,25 00:35 other posts 
Bonnie and Clyde were known KILLERS. They were not some couple out for a Sunday afternoon ride. The UPS driver who died during a shooting involving police was a tragedy but it was not intentional.
Having said that, if Bonnie and Clyde had survived, they would have been indicted and gone to trial. The UPS driver would not have needed a trial.
Some legal and illegal professions have inherent risks. A bank robber knows there are guards and possibly cops present when they rob a bank. But, they are able to surrender and get a trial.
You call me a hypocrite. Why? Because I believe in the rule of law?
By phart [Ignore] 27,Oct,25 08:15 other posts 
DUH! Dope dealers are killers, cops can kill, just as they did the UPS guy, without being held responsible 90% of the time,long as it's a white guy that died
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Oct,25 08:39 other posts 
Yeah, I Googled it:

The claim that all fishing boats require a transponder and registration number to avoid being in violation in international waters is an oversimplification. Specific requirements depend on the boat's size, its gross tonnage, and the regulations of its flag state and relevant regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs). Larger commercial vessels are subject to stricter rules, while smaller fishing vessels are often exempt.
Registration requirements
In international waters, a fishing boat is primarily governed by its flag state—the country where it is registered.
Unique Identifier (IMO Number): The most important identification for international fishing is the International Maritime Organization (IMO) number. This unique, seven-digit number is assigned to eligible vessels, stays with the boat for life, and is required for fishing vessels over a certain size by many flag states and RFMOs.
Flag State Numbering: The vessel's registration number and port of registry, issued by the flag state, must be displayed on the hull.
Combating illegal fishing: Accurate vessel identification is critical for combating illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, which costs the industry billions of dollars each year.
AIS transponder requirements
The claim that all fishing boats need a transponder is inaccurate. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) mandates Automatic Identification System (AIS) transponders for large vessels, but governments set their own rules for fishing boats.
Vessel size: AIS requirements vary based on a fishing vessel's length or gross tonnage. For example:
In the U.S.: Fishing vessels 65 feet or longer must carry an AIS transponder when operating in U.S. navigable waters.
In the EU: Fishing vessels longer than 15 meters (approx. 49 feet) must be equipped with AIS.
Transponder classes: AIS transponders come in different classes, reflecting the size and type of vessel.
Class A: Transmits a more robust signal more frequently and is typically required for larger commercial vessels.
Class B: A more cost-effective option for smaller commercial or recreational boats.
By dgraff [Ignore] 11,Oct,25 07:52 other posts 
Listen to you defending a bunch of drug smugglers give me a break
Blow the mother humpers out of the water
By phart [Ignore] 12,Oct,25 16:58 other posts 

The way I look at it, I have watched 2 good people turn to absolute SHIT due to drugs and I would MUCH rather see some dope dealers get put out of work and the dope ruined than to see our citizens made addicts.

Cat apparently has never dealt with the aftermath of a person being addicted to drugs or she would feel as we do, get rid of the shit. nip it in the bud
By CAT52! [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 10:23 other posts 
“Cat apparently has never dealt with the aftermath”? Listen Phart, my first son-in-law blew his brains out in a coke fog. My other, ex-son-in-law is hooked on coke. My ex-brother in law has been dependent on booze and coke most of his adult life. I’ve sat with him over long sleepless nights, at my home, holding him in my arms while he was going through withdrawal symptoms. A happening that occurred many times throughout my married life to WOODY. WOODY didn’t help but I love Rudy even though we never crossed any lines. Don’t tell me I don’t know. Don’t tell me i don’t care. And, most of all, you don’t know me at all to give you the right to say how I feel.
By phart [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 10:51 other posts 
well I apologize for that, BUT at the same time it is very difficult to know what you are going thru when you support the criminals that bring that terrible stuff to your family more so than the people trying to stop it in any way they can. arresting the people only to turn them back loose doesn't work.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 13,Oct,25 12:35 other posts 
I love my family dearly but, I also love my country. I'm not supporting criminals. I'm supporting the rule of law, our Constitution.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 16,Oct,25 22:47 other posts 
The first four boats had what was coming to them, but the latest boat was dead in the water, no need to blow it up, that was wrong.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 17,Oct,25 11:49 other posts 
And now we know one or more of those boats were from Trinidad. How about those from the UK? Are we blowing up boats from Canada on the Great Lakes? I bet if they blow any Cuban boats up, Key West would get very hot. 🤣🤣
Your administration has still not provided any evidence of drugs on that first boat.
We saw big packages on video, floating in the water. Are you believing that those were not retrieved? So, show the world photographs of those same packages in custody.
Let investigators confirm that those are the same as on video. That's how a truthful administration handles international criticism.

You lot talk a lot about your sovereignty, but you don't give a damn about the sovereignty of other countries. At least have the decency to show the countries some evidence,
after you murder their citizens.

If Mexico blows up a pickup truck with Americans, will you be satisfied with the claim that those were drugsrunners or arms smugglers?

If they are not transparent, don't ask people to trust it. Trump has forfeited his credibility.
Does your administration have a goal of causing international criticism?
By Cunt_Man [Ignore] 12,Oct,25 20:44 other posts 
Hegseth announces U.S. blew up 4th boat near Venezuela

WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Friday he ordered a fourth strike on a small boat in the waters off Venezuela, according to a social media post.

In his post, Hegseth said that “our intelligence, without a doubt, confirmed that this vessel was trafficking narcotics, the people onboard were narco-terrorists, and they were operating on a known narco-trafficking transit route.”

READ MORE: Trump declares U.S. in ‘non-international armed conflict’ with drug cartels

The strike comes less than a day after it was revealed that President Donald Trump declared drug cartels to be unlawful combatants and declared that the United States is now in an “armed conflict” with them in a memo obtained by The Associated Press.

According to Hegseth’s post, the strike killed four men, but it offered no other details on who they were or what organization they belonged to.

The video of the strike posted online showed a small boat moving in open water when it suddenly explodes. As the smoke from the explosion clears, the boat is visible, consumed with flames, floating motionless on the water.

WATCH: U.S. military in the Caribbean an ‘illegal’ threat, Venezuela tells UN General Assembly

Last month, the U.S. military carried out three other deadly strikes against boats in the Caribbean that the administration accused of ferrying drugs.

With this strike, at least three of these operations have now been carried out on vessels that originated from Venezuela.

Those strikes followed a buildup of U.S. maritime forces in the Caribbean unlike any seen in recent times.

WATCH: ‘Do the honorable thing and resign,’ Hegseth tells military leaders who dislike new approach

The Navy’s presence in the region — eight warships with over 5,000 sailors and Marines — has been pretty stable for weeks, according to two defense officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing operations.

Officials in the Pentagon, when asked for more details about the strike, referred The Associated Press back to Hegseth’s post on social media.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Oct,25 11:41 other posts 
Are you thinking that you are adding something useful?


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#73



Show your Genitals