Page #2
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#66
New Comment Rating: -4 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
She has lots of dirt on Trump, so she's blackmailing him.
Epstein and Maxwell had a MULTI-BILLION dollar enterprise
pimping out under@ge prostitute/sex-slaves to billionaires.
Epstein and Trump have been best friends for years.
There is lots of public evidence and testimonials against Trump.
Not just Trump, but also against his first wife Ivana.
One of Epstein's victims, Maria Farmer, claims that Ivana Trump
was also good friends with Ghislaine Maxwell, and she witnessed them
hunting for new victims for Epstein.
They would cruise schools together, for pretty young girls in school uniforms.
only registered users can see external links
Trump is obviously burying the Epstein files, because there's at the very least
the testimony of Maria Farmer, pictures from Trump and half naked girls from
Epstein's vault, but likely even financial records linking Trump and Epstein.
Trump has been a filthy sexual predator all his life and you know it.
At least you deny it. How evil would your side be, if you just accepted it?
i would be hard pressed to trust a photo that suddenly appeared out of nowwhere now.
The age of photos can be quite accurately be determined.
There are still ways to show new fake photos to be fake. They are not perfect.
That you fall for the clearest fakes doesn't make them undetectable.
If those photos appeared, they would come from the possession of the FBI,
because they confiscated all evidence from Epstein.
Besides, there is a shit-ton more evidence on Trump's friendship with Epstein
than just photos. Ever heard of his little black address book?
Donald Trump’s Name Appears
His name is listed along with multiple phone numbers, including:
- His business numbers
- Mar-a-Lago
- Trump Organization contacts
- Trump Family and Associates Listed
Other Trump-linked names appear:
- Ivana Trump
- Ivanka Trump
- Eric Trump
- Alan Garten (Trump Org. lawyer)
Trump’s staff and Mar-a-Lago contacts are also included.
There is also evidence linking Epstein to Mar-a-Lago.
Virginia Giuffre (then Virginia Roberts) has testified in multiple legal proceedings that
she was working as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago when she met Ghislaine Maxwell.
If Trump wasn't worried about Ghislaine Maxwell having dirt, she couldn't use it.
And if the case wasn't damning for Trump, he wouldn't have it buried like this.
He is also desperately trying to distract everyone from it.
In any case, at least you deny it. I don't know if you cannot admit it to yourself
or you just don't want to admit it to others, but it would be worse if you owned it
and then STILL supported the guy.
And how do you like the following?:
The administration’s FY 2026 budget proposal includes a $646 million cut to FEMA.
It also imposed a freeze of approximately $3.6 billion in unspent FEMA funds.
FEMA has undergone a cut of roughly 20% of its workforce.
Weather forecasting funding at NOAA was cut by $150 million.
phart just accused Bill Gates of
"taking our tax money and sending it so far away it can't help our own citizens in need."
Here is a clear example of Trump taking your tax money far away from helping your own citizens in need.
Well, at least he's cutting taxes for Bill Gates. So some of your money will still go
to poor people, for food and HIV medicine.
in other words, countys didn't cover their bases but it is so easy for you to blame Trump because he cut wasteful spending.
but use some common sense.in 1 area the water rose 26 feet in 45 minutes. there is not much of a warning system that would help in that situation.
There is ZERO evidence of any significant wasteful spending, unless you call every dollar spent to help people a waste.
You need good weather forecasting to predict water rising 26 feet in 45 minutes.
They can literally not do as good as a job as before, because of Trump's cuts.
However, I can predict that, without a doubt, far worse floods will happen, more often,
and you will need FEMA to have much more money, if you want to minimize the damage and human suffering.
you obviously never dealt with fema.
Can you afford EVERY STATE, to be ready for EVERY CATASTROPHE?
Why have it divided by state's borders? Why not every city?
It's just a nonsense argument, to cut spending for citizens in need.
How about the unlucky states? Many of them are red states, by the way. They would be held back a lot from that necessity. That doesn't just affect those states, that puts a break on the economy of the US as a whole.
Cooperation is always favorable to everyone as a whole. In economy 1 + 1 = 3.
Likewise, when I see people in need, I also want the whole world to help.
That's, sympathy / empathy, but also just reciprocity.
We don't have much control over luck / bad luck in the world, but we do
have control over how we treat (other) people, who are dealt a bad hand.
However, I understand that there is no unlimited pool of money,
so I support a system that uses the money most efficiently.
I think that's always a system that shares the risk with the biggest group.
It's like with insurances; you share the risk with other people,
instead setting aside money personally, for when something happens.
Almost no one can set aside enough money for a new house, when it burns down,
so you share the risk with a million or more other people.
Still, an insurance company could go bankrupt, if it only insured one city,
and there was a big fire burning down a lot of houses.
That's why you want to share the risk with as many people as possible.
The one thing that limits the size of the group is solidarity. People need
to feel some empathy for others in the group that they share the risk with.
They don't want to pay for people that they don't care about. They forget
that it's beneficial for everyone to maximize the size of the group, as soon
as people that they don't feel empathy towards are helped by the system.
That's what you see happening with FEMA.
here is a ai search result,
"Yes, some Florida homes have been rebuilt multiple times with FEMA assistance due to repeated flooding. This is partly due to the "50% rule" in flood zones, which requires homes with damage exceeding half the structure's value to be rebuilt to current standards, often involving elevation. While this rule aims to reduce future flood damage and costs to taxpayers, it can lead to a cycle of rebuilding for some homeowners"
50% of value, rebuilt multilabel times, is the same as rebuilding the house from ground up money wise. why keep putting the house in the same low spot to flood again?that is waste,put the house on high ground or redesign it to be more durable in the storm
each state knows it's problem areas.
each county knows it's problem areas. we have flood ways here that we can't even put up a mail box in without getting bitched at by the county.let alone a house.
there are so many issues with fema,it needs to at minimum be revamped from the ground up. and audited regularly.by someone besides it's self.
Do they get any money from Trump to organize their own
Emergency Management, like FEMA, but on a state level?
If not, all those states need to significantly raise state taxes.
When have you last seen Republicans create anything?
They can only brake things.
Fatalities: 37 people lost their lives across the state.
Damage: Estimated at $7 billion, with agriculture and timber alone accounting for approximately $5.5 billion in losses.
Does Georgia now have to "step up to the plate" to prepare for hurricanes?
Georgia averages one direct hurricane landfall every 10–15 years.
Climate change will probably increase their risk, but their risk of crippling hurricane damage is much lower than other states.
Do they now have to prepare for hurricanes, a 1 in 50 year event, for them?
Don't you understand how INEFFICIENT that is?
Didn't you want to reduce WASTE?
You lot want to eliminate waste, but you have no idea what waste is.
i want to see the feds simply hand over the money to the states to use as they see the need.
feds can't manage a whore house, much less storm damage.
They are not going to give that money to the states, they are only cutting it
to reduce the deficit they created to cut taxes for the wealthy.
People can suffer, so the billionaires can become trillionaires.
meanwhile, i put the tv near the screen door so i could stand out in the yard and look up and also see the radar scan.
i watched both and it did not even rain when the supposed tornado was going over my house.
nothing.
far as i am concerned the weather man is the only man that can lie on his job and still keep it.
Tornadoes are a very localized phenomenon. They can completely destroy
half a village and leave the other half completely intact.
This is the Annual Tornado Damage in the US:
Property Damage: $1.1–2 billion per year
Crop Damage: ~$100 million annually (varies)
Deaths: ~70 per year (historical average)
Injuries: ~1,500 per year
Are you denying that? Are you saying that all the victims are lying?
The past few days, our weather forecasters were raising the alarm (yellow and orange warnings) for thunderstorms in many parts of the country. We were anticipating at least heavy rain and some thunder, but we have seen only a small shower. I didn't even close the doors and windows. If I didn't understand weather, I would maybe start to accuse the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) of lying.
Instead, I watched the news and saw that parts of the Netherlands, mostly in the northern regions, experienced severe thunderstorms and storms that caused notable damage, including flooding and downed trees. This matched the earlier code orange alerts issued by forecasters. I understand that weather is LOCAL.
I'm not denying that shit happens, just because it didn't happen to ME.
How far removed are you, from becoming a loon like this one?
only registered users can see external links
He thinks weather radar is for controlling weather, instead of predicting it.
the National Education Association Charter Repeal Act. The NEA was chartered by Congress in 1906 to champion America’s teachers and improve our schools, but it has spiraled into a partisan machine that’s more about radical ideology and toxic propaganda than education.
It's true that they don't like your ideology, but that's their job.
Their job is to defend history, science and critical thinking.
YOUR SIDE is the propaganda pushing side.
You want your propaganda pushed on children unrestricted.
It's what happened in 1933 Germany too.
The Democrat Party was the lifeblood of slavery, the KKK, and Jim Crow. The Klan was the armed militant apparatus of the Democrats. In contrast, the Republican Party was founded a few years before the Civil War for the sole purpose of uniting the anti-slave movement under a single political coalition.
with that being copied and pasted, let's see where that takes us
The argument,
"Without slaves, who will pick our crops?" was a common concern raised by proponents of slavery, particularly Southern plantation owners, during the debate over abolition in the 19th century. This argument highlighted the economic dependency of the Southern agricultural system on enslaved labor, especially for cash crops like cotton and tobacco.
so here in modern times our own Cat and Ananas are asking who will pick our crops without the illegal immigrants
does any of this sound similar to you folks?
and by the way, southern plantation owners were democrats
so there is no wonder now if you do some research, why democrats are so hell bent on immigrant labor.
10 kids found working at the pot farm in california, owned by a guy that donated alot to the govenor newsome. um>>????
here is some history to read, read about the democrats stealing land from mexico and our native indians.
only registered users can see external links
for their own protection.
We talked about the history of the Democrats and the Republicans before.
The Republican Party was once the more liberal party, especially on slavery and civil rights in the 19th century. Over time—particularly during the 20th-century civil rights movement—both parties experienced a shift in their ideological bases, leading to the modern alignment where Republicans are generally conservative and Democrats are generally liberal.
It's not the name of the party that is associated with racism or the support for slavery, it's the ideology. Liberals have always supported equal rights and freedom, conservatives don't care about equality and only pretend to care about freedom, while they still support wage slavery. You yourself think people deserve nothing besides what they work for and even 40 hrs/per week should get you the basics for survival. It's only the happy few that deserve ridiculous wealth, because you think they are super-human.
I have NEVER supported the exploitation of illegals, I want to crack down on employers who do that. I'll allow legal immigrant labor, under a license system, but with all the same rights and rewards that natural born citizens get. I have warned you that you allowed your economy to become dependent on illegals, and you're hurting yourself, while you are hurting them. That's a whole different issue than supporting illegal migration. The common sense solution would be to legalize the lot of them, except for the true violent criminals. Don't lie that Trump is doing that.
And people who don't know how things changed, will show their ignorance,
by linking the current Democratic party with support for slavery,
while the Democrats back then were the conservatives from the South,
who are now ALL in the Republican party.
It's good if you don't want to be associated with slavery,
but then also not try to justify slavery, as your ilk often does.
only registered users can see external links
folks like you don't care if coal miners are put out of work. you just say they can retrain for another job no big deal right?
so those working in the tourist industry, they can just retrain for another job, no big deal.
sad to feel that way but that is using liberal logic
The difference between the coal miners and the tourist industry is the following:
- New energy brings much more, much healthier and better paying jobs, than the job of coal miner. In total that shift is positive for society.
- The collapse of the tourist industry is not replaced by anything. It's just a loss of your GDP, which isn't compensated by anything else. There are no other jobs coming in its place.
However, you won't have a shortage of jobs, because of all the migrant workers you are putting in a concentration camp. Your tourist workers just shouldn't be picky, because those jobs aren't much fun. That's why you had those migrant workers for them.
so is john kerry going to be the proverbial "uncle tom" of the democrats now that he admits to agreeing with Trump on a issue??
'News'MAX: "Look over there, a squirrel!!"
there is no hope for liberals, they can't be shown the facts and it do any good.
All the Democrats were shouting from the rooftops "PROTECT OUR BORDER!!!".
You are all living in an alternate reality and even Kerry is affected by it.
Kerry is correct that Democrats couldn't get their message out successfully, but he's wrong in saying “He was right. The problem is—we all should have been right. Everybody should have been right, doing the same thing, all moving in the same direction.”. Democrats SHOULD NOT move into the direction of eliminating due process.
One Democrat saying something that you like, is a squirrel.
Here is ONE pastor saying something that most Democratic voters agree on,
while most other pastors are saying the exact opposite. Is he now on CNN,
as an example of the other side, to argue: "We must be right, because this single person from the other side says that we are right on this issue!"?
only registered users can see external links
I'm sure that CNN does that sometimes, but it means NOTHING to ME.
There is someone from the group that is wrong about everything,
agreeing with my point on something? "OK, you're welcome. Is it just this?"
"I don't need you to agree with me, to know I'm right. I have ARGUMENTS!"
if bill gates is so damn concerned about world health, he can spend his own money to fix it instead of taking our tax money and sending it so far away it can't help our own citizens in need.
he already sends a lot of his money over seas, that's well and good,it's his to send, i just don't approve of him wanting to send my money over there.
The US was doing that too. That was actually a good thing you did.
Why do you think that Bill Gates had any part in your tax-dollars going "far away"?
The US stopping that, especially so abruptly is incredibly damaging.
Using your money like that is called 'soft power', it's to your own advantage.
Why do you talk about helping your own citizens in need?
You don't want to. You prefer to help the billionaires, who don't need it.
watch the simulation at the very end and it will make it very clear how lucky Trump is to be alive. i know it would have brought great pleasure to cat and others had he not turned his head but it saved our country.
However, I cannot decide what's worse, Trump continuing to destroy your country,
adding chaos to the world and deciding to accelerate climate change, or him dying
that day and giving MAGA a martyr.
only registered users can see external links
belong to the “white race”. Ever heard of it?
only registered users can see external links (Funny, but not 100% correct)
Google "George Shishim" if you want to know more.
only registered users can see external links
you are so mad at Trump for bombing a few nuclear labs but yet 1 of your heros dropped a bunch of bombs.
only registered users can see external links
"If Andrew Cuomo thinks that makes me less of a Jew,
that's just one more reason why he's unfit to represent us."
ok so this guy takes all of what jeff bezo's is worth and divides it amoung all of us Americans. we would get a whopping 730 bucks each.
that would really fix the world wouldn't it? yea right.
only registered users can see external links
Isn't that ridiculous?
Half of American adults have $500 or less in their savings account,
but this ONE asshole has MUCH more than ALL OF THEM COMBINED.
The fact that you think that's normal shows your brainwashing.
Liberal globalization refers to the process of increasing global interconnectedness driven by the principles of economic liberalism, democracy, and multilateralism. It's characterized by the promotion of free trade, open markets, and the establishment of international institutions to facilitate cooperation and manage global challenges
in other words, a 1 world government. sad that it takes Putin to bring this up, no one will listen to him since he is considered the enemy ,but we as Americans would be so much better off if we minded our own damn country and it's needs first
New Comment Go to top