Page #3
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#73
New Comment Rating: -4 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
The former girlfriend violated my trust so severally i probably will remain inactive indefinitely.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
you just don't have enough money to satisfy the Plutocrats.
the homeless. Is that 'you personally', that I'm asking that from?
People who are let down by the system, should not be dependent on charity.
I pay around $30 per month in charities. Only a tiny percentage of that goes to
the homeless. Homelessness is not a problem that is created by lack of charity, homelessness is created by right-wing policies. When they 'market' housing,
the market will maximize profit for the wealthy who control it. They turn homes
into a scarce resource to blow up the price, making housing unaffordable for
lots of people. Voila; homelessness.
I direct my government to the homeless. My party's highest priority is building a million affordable homes, and reducing the rent and house prices of all homes.
Before you start about affordable homes again. They are not tax-funded homes, they are publicly owned homes, that take out the exploitation from the wealthy.
They are also not crappy homes. They are safe, comfortable, well-insulated houses,
that suit the needs of the people living it them.
The only difference is that they are not owned by slumlords or private equity, who exploit the tenants, and let the houses deteriorate, to fill the pockets of the owners.
Everyone should be able to afford a home, no matter if they are working, on welfare,
on disability, or on social security.
For people who fuck up their lives themselves, there should be shelters for 100% of them.
And they should get help to put their life back in order.
That shouldn't be funded by charity, but by taxes.
The people who have told you that civilization should solve it's problems with charity,
are the wealthy people who don't want to pay taxes, and make you resent taxes,
with the propaganda they are funding.
And they should get help to put their life back in order.
That shouldn't be funded by charity, but by taxes."
I don't agree with taxes funding it. taxes didn't fuck them up, taxes shouldn't fix them. and how many times do you cycle these people thru this system on tax money before it becomes clear it is a waste of tax money and stop?
there has to be a line in the sand. or the system will be abused.
And why does a poor person that doesn't work deserve the same quality home on someone else's dime as someone who works and pay for it themselves? No no, a free house is a cheap house to get you buy until you decide to do better for yourself.stop coddling these poor folks or they will always be poor.
Why should You or I work what we can and live in minimal housing so those that won't work can live in the same thing paid for by us?
Falling out of a womb entitles you to nothing once you become a adult
being a disease first surfaced early in the 19th century. In 1956, the American Medical Association (AMA) de- clared alcoholism an illness, and in 1987, the AMA and other medical organizations officially termed addiction a disease (Lesh- ner, 1997).
If it was actually as simple as being a Illness for alcohol, ok, so then a person is sick, they would go to a dr and get medicine or a treatment for it and pay for it and go home. If they had money for the liquor, they have money for the dr, problem will be fixed.
Disease, Ok ,so how much government tax money gets spent to treat cancer? not much at all. medical bills pile up and insurance and the victim pays the bill.
Same with heart disease, insurance and the victim pays for the care.
Granted some government tax money might be sent for research, but you and i both know that a cure won't be public because it would upset the apple cart of the system that profits from control and treatment of cancer. If it's cured, the cash cow disappears.
So with this logic, again, tax money for fixed dope heads? NO, Hell no. it was very preventable. DON'T take the shit in the first place and you can't get addicted.
Don't drink and you can't get addicted. Prevent the issue by never starting. and Never starting can be fixed by putting away dope dealers and stopping the flow of it into our country.
I could use the excuse of it runs in the family if I became a alcoholic. both my dad and grandfather drank to much, thank God my dad quit Many years ago and is over it. quit cold turkey. So i know it can be done.
That's showing that you have a problematic idea about 'normal' disease too.
When people have diabetes or heart disease, I expect more than to "go to a dr and get medicine or a treatment for it and pay for it and go home". That's just exploiting people's health for the greed of 'Big Pharma'. People get disease for a reason. Their bodies are damaged from the unhealthy life that capitalism has created.
The profit incentive for making people ADDICTED to unhealthy food is causing disease and harm to society. Addiction? Yes, sweet, salty, fatty food HACK our brain. Our brain has evolved to want sugars, salt and fat, because it used to be very difficult to find in nature, when were dependent on it for our survival.
There is no food that you can catch or pluck in nature, that contains the combination of sugars, salt and fat. When we eat it, our brain send the signal: "YES, we found the best source of food EVER!". That IS a dopamine rush,
which is the basis for most addictions.
The problem is that the worst factory foods contain the most sugars, salt and fat. Then you eat much more of sugars, salt and fat than the body can handle.
They also put in the most unhealthy versions of sugars (saccharin, not fructose)
and fats (trans-fats and oxidized fats). Lots of things that hurt the body and
almost nothing, like vitamins and minerals, that the body needs to stay healthy.
Doctors should not just subscribe medicine or a treatment, they should help patients eliminate or reduce the root cause of the disease, which is addiction
to unhealthy food.
STILL, that isn't the full problem, because capitalism has also made heavily processed factory garbage, which they sell as food, CHEAPER than unprocessed REAL food. The result is that poor people can only afford to eat garbage.
Many American children have breakfast and lunch in school. However, the budget, and therefore the infrastructure, is not adequate to feed them fresh healthy food. That results in the kids eating mostly heavily processed factory garbage. If there are some healthy food options, the kids don't eat them, because they are addicted too. If adults are unable to kick the addiction, do you expect children to?
Children are our future, but they have (the first signs of) disease before they even leave school. When PepsiCo and Kraft Heinz are sponsoring kid's meals, they don't do it to make kids healthier, they do it to sell more of their unhealthy products.
Why it is MY responsibility, when I didn't cause their suffering?
I don't like charity, because it sucks as a solution.
It's just fighting the symptoms of the disease, a bit.
Why do you even think that lefties and socialists are about generosity?
I also don't think that you are all about selfishness.
If you were rationally selfish, you would support socialism,
because then you would have good healthcare and better living standards.
Propaganda just made you support the selfishness of the wealthy.
You're sort of being generous, just for people who don't need or deserve it.
You don't HAVE to care about people to be a socialist. It helps, but it's not necessary. We ALL have to LIVE in society, and that society is better when we don't allow a minority to exploit the rest. The 'rest', the 99%, is you and me (you MORE than me).
Some of us will probably immediately stop being a socialist, if they end up with
a big fortune. As long as you're not part of the wealthy, who exploit the rest,
and make life objectively horrible for lots of people, it's just RATIONAL.
We see a problem, we understand the damage that is causes, we understand
the CAUSE, and we want to convince people to support the SOLUTION.
Those people got destroyed by the system, so I want the system to help them.
The system is not MY responsibility either, but I live under it and I think it's doing
a piss poor job for many people, so I choose to be politically active.
Food stamps are bullshit. The state should pay you enough money to live on.
Of course it starts with regulation that prevents accidents like you had,
and good healthcare, so much less people NEED those social systems.
Your government failed you, because it has been too right-wing for decades.
Why does it make sense to you, to make it the most right-wing ever?
He couldn't fix everything.
Wasn't your case denied by a judge? Who appointed that judge?
Just because this happened to you under Obama, doesn't mean it was his fault.
I don't blame Trump for anything just happening under Trump either.
There should be a logical connection.
(Like with Bush causing the financial crisis, by completely deregulating the finance industry, resulting in a house of cards of derivative products designed to scam people. It completely fell apart, causing the 2008 crash. The smart people saw it coming years ahead. Bush's deregulation was designed to let the wealthy exploit the working class, and it did, even when it crashed.)
When Democrats are allowed to run for more than one or two presidencies, they could actually start improving the system and provide Americans with benefits they never had, like an effective system of disability benefits. The problem is that every time they have organized something, Americans vote for Republicans again, who destroy it all again. That's why the country with one of the highest GDPs in the world feels like living in the poorer parts of Europe for most people.
No one who has your health issues is denied disability benefits in my country.
And that was not the right-wing parties who implemented that.
only registered users can see external links
Just so you know ananas2xlekker I did not watch your youtube link...
I know it would just be something you think supports your loon ideas. Sorry, you are a damn loon ananas2xlekker
You could be a democrat to, and vote to make the changes you see fit. IF the majority agrees with you,then shit will go your way.if not, oh well.
Oops, spoiler.
It must be written by a democrat
Youtube "bows" to Trump.
No, Youtube learned a hard lesson about censorship.
they show kids how to ride on plastic tables towed behind cars and getting hurt without a second thought, but they censor someone they don't like what they say.
and like good little cucks, they suck his dick. PATHETIC!
YouTube didn't break any laws, they only blocked content that violated their TOS.
They are a private company. They could have a TOS rule against picking your nose.
The only thing they are obligated to do is follow their own TOS consistently.
YouTube Community Guidelines / Policies
only registered users can see external links
'Child safety' is part of their Guidelines. If they are showing kids hurting themselves,
that's a good reason to flag the video. I do that sometimes.
Free speech is not a right to say whatever you want, especially not on platforms owned by private companies. Freedom of speech is primarily the right to criticize the government. That's what Trump is cracking down on.
He's now assigning the term 'violent conduct' to speech he refers to as anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity. That is a clear violation of the second amendment.
If you agree with it, you're stupid, because this can easily come back to bite you.
Those terms can easily be interpreted as what you do, when the Democrats are in power again. Don't think I will show any sympathy, if you are harmed by your own crack-down
on free speech.
Anti-Americanism: You shit on The Constitution all the time.
Anti-capitalism: Tariffs are Anti-capitalist.
Anti-Christianity: Jesus loved the poor and the sick and hated hypocrites.
You will be so fucked when Democrats start using the precedent Trump is setting.
Trump himself was banned for inciting violence, towards groups of people and towards specific people. That's not just illegal speech, but it most definitely violated YouTube's Community Guidelines / Policies. Trump received at least one strike when YouTube removed content for incitement and temporarily suspended uploads.
YouTube would have surely won the case against them, but they are afraid of him
abusing his power against them even more, so they bow down. Those millions of dollars are therefore a clear bribe.
When will you ever learn to understand your own law?
"Yep, Trump is extorting money form companies again,
and like good little cucks, they suck his dick. PATHETIC!"
And he went on to justify his claim.
And I'm 10000% sure that the fascistoid, phart will do anything to refute this fact. It does not matter, he'll say, that trump extorted money. His god can do anything he likes. And, using his usual response tactic, he'll diffuse the matter in petty ways such as referring to another person, probably democrat, who has also extorted money. And he'll say: "see? those far left people also extort money." He'll do anything to avoid attaching even the slightest responsibility to his dear leader and his cronies.
What you miss about this is the double standard that folks like myself keep trying to open your eyes to but your blinders won't let you see.
liberals can take money, fuck everything and so forth and it is ok but let 1 conservative get a kick back and oh my , all hell is supposed to break loose.
That's every Republican president, for decades.
They all leave your country in a fucking mess.
Then Democrats get voted in, to fix that mess again.
And when they don't do that quickly enough, stupid Americans vote MAGA.
Now your country is turning to shit, quicker than ever before.
Democrats should just say: "Fuck you, we don't fix your shit anymore!".
OR IF they decide to give it another try, it should should be FULL SOCIALISM,
because anything else will not fix the US quickly enough, for stupid Americans.
The 'Earth will keep turning' for a while, but the shit will hit the fan soon. I hope that boneless Chuck Schumer won't give in to the demons, to prevent some shit.
Republicans shovel money into their own pockets and the pockets of the wealthy.
Democrats want funding for Medicaid (for low-income, disabled, elderly), subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), public health programs, Food assistance, unemployment insurance, ensure government agencies are staffed sufficiently, public media funding as a source of independent journalism and cultural programming, Development assistance, health programs abroad, diplomacy, global initiatives, infrastructure, scientific research, environmental protection, education, preventing ACA premiums from rising and to keep coverage affordable, and keep debt interest discretionary.
Trump cutting all those expenses will not reduce the deficit or reduce
the tax-burden on the average American, it's just intended for more FREEBIES for billionaires.
You just said: "I can't get a small monthly check that was SUPPOSED to be there for me from the government after doing my part.", but then you support Trump taking away your chance of ever getting anything like that.
Democrats want that for you, Republicans just want you to be dead.
The people that work and pay taxes should be the priority of the programs in place to help, not those that have done nothing.
well maybe Trumps tariffs are doing some harm?
I think even ananas2xlekker knows this. But Remember alekker likes to talk perfect scenarios as explained exactly in his tard books or internet searches.
while Trump has cut taxes for the wealthy. It makes everything more expensive.
It's the opposite of what people like you gave as a reason to vote for Trump.
Why don't you give me a list of the tariffs that other countries had on the US,
before Trump's trade war? Show that you can do some internet searches too.
This is a spoof video the farmer made.
Splorn is not even a real crop, he is actually cutting silage, the machine behind him is a silage cutter.
BUT Here is what I wanted you to ses Ananas, folks like you are so eager to jump on Trump you don't think for 2 minutes.
Cnn actually reached out to this farmer for a INTERVEIW on national tv!
His video was stolen and run on a liberal network.
Occupy Democrats
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Don't just make up shit, show facts and cause and effect reasoning.
New Comment Go to top