No just mentally ill people left to run the streets like animals.

OK, so a liberal funding projects with money is "interfering with your political process's"
and a "Dark MAGA" offering $100 for people in swing states to sign a petition, which requires to be registered, and handing out prizes to only MAGA voters, is not.

Why is it not the same for?:
- Americans for Prosperity (Koch network, economic freedom focus)
- Heritage Action for America (Heritage Foundation’s political arm)
- Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America
- Turning Point USA
- MAGA Inc. (supports Trump & GOP candidates)
- Congressional Leadership Fund (supports House Republicans)
- Senate Leadership Fund (supports Senate Republicans)
- Club for Growth Action (anti-tax, pro-market GOP candidates)
- Cato Institute (libertarian, Koch-backed)
- Hoover Institution
- Manhattan Institute
- NRA Institute for Legislative Action (gun rights)
- Federalist Society (judicial nominations, law)
- Daily Wire (funded partly by wealthy conservative donors)
- PragerU (funded partly by wealthy conservative donors)

yea, and i bet they will steal the food instead of bartering for it.

And i bet they will be to stupid to save any seeds so they can grow MORE food.which may be how that 1 got it all to start with. he was hungry and planted seed and grew it.
there is more than 1 way to solve a problem. some of those ways require work,and those other 9, i bet 7 won't be willing to do that work.that's why they may be hungry

Yeah, there are those and it’s unfortunate.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes

As this is

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

not all of them are peaceful drum beaters and you know it.
"Individuals involved in the movement subscribe to a range of left-wing ideologies, and tend to hold anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist, and anti-state views. A majority of individuals involved are anarchists, communists, and socialists,[7] although some social democrats also participate in the antifa movement.[5][8][9] The name antifa and the logo with two flags representing anarchism and communism are derived from the German antifa movement.[10] Dartmouth College historian Mark Bray, author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, credits Anti-Racist Action (ARA) as the precursor of modern antifa groups in the United States.[11][12]"

Does that sound like a book club that is peaceful to you? Communist, anarchist? Really??

huh?

Likely comment from your idiot ass ananas2xlekker. Your side always accused us of what your shit side was doing.

I told you before, free speech doesn't mean that you are allowed to say whatever you want. There are limits to free speech. I mentioned that SIX TIMES, in the last few days,
in the 'Freedom of speech' topic.

They are:
- Incitement to imminent lawless action (e.g., calling for violence right now).
- True threats (serious expressions of intent to harm someone).
- Obscenity (narrowly defined, not just “offensive” content).
- Defamation (false statements that harm reputation).
- Fraud (knowingly false claims to cheat people).
- Child exploitation material (entirely excluded).
- Certain national security exceptions (e.g., classified info leaks).

Jimmy Kimmel didn't and doesn't violate ANY of those limits on free speech.

The state’s civil rights laws that are mentioned in the bill are broadly based on those categories of the limits on free speech, though it simplifies some of the legal detail.
It's the Californian legal limits on free speech.

ALL U.S. states have civil rights laws, but they differ in scope, enforcement, and how much they brush up against free speech. None can legally go beyond the First Amendment floor set by the U.S. Constitution, but some states regulate more aggressively in gray areas (e.g. harassment, hate crimes, discrimination in public life).

Every state has laws that prohibit:
- Violence and threats (true threats, incitement to imminent lawless action)
- Harassment and stalking (especially when directed at individuals, repeated, and unwanted)
- Hate crimes (enhanced penalties when crimes are motivated by race, religion, etc.)
- Discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations (race, gender, religion, disability, etc.)

California does have one of the more stricter civil rights speech-related laws:
- Broad Ralph and Bane Civil Rights Acts give both criminal and civil remedies against threats, intimidation, and interference with rights.
- Strong workplace/education harassment laws extend to speech that creates a “hostile environment.”

SB 771 would further expand liability to algorithmic amplification online. That's NOT censoring speech, that introducing stricter enforcement of legal limits on speech.

Are you saying that conservative speech is by it's very nature violent, threatening, harassing, stalking, hateful or discriminatory?
Well, cry me a river, you should learn to respect the rights of the people you damage
with your speech then.

Really? WHEN?

Sure, I think Soros is anti-fascist. He's old enough to remember what they did.
"Born in Hungary in 1930, he lived through the Nazi occupation of 1944–1945,
which resulted in the murder of over 500,000 Hungarian Jews."

My thinking has never preferred violence, but there is a point that talking is over.
We cannot let history repeat itself. My pacifist streak is running very thin.