Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#68
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Anthropological study 2.TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME 3.No Collusion. 4.TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME analysis. 5.NOT TRUMP............NOT EVER TRUMP Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
On November 5 if Trump is declared the winner it would be a fair election with no problems whatsoever but if he loses we all know that he will never ever accept defeat. Never.
Here’s how Joe Biden could circumvent that.
if Trump wins then sometime between November 6th and mid January he could resign as president which would make Kamala Harris president. She could give him a full pardon for anything that he’s ever done for his entire life and that’s that.
She would also become the first female president in US history.
Sound doable?
He did that because between now and election day Trump will do 40 more stupid things that will make voters forget all about it.
He did it to steer the news cycle away from COVID-19.
He did it to protect himself because Stone suggested a few months ago that he "chose" not to turn on Trump insinuating that he knows something and would talk if he went to prison.
He did it because he's written off any chance of reelection.
"Disney Land may not be open but the rollercoaster continues."
-John Meacham, Presidential Historian
Oh that's rich! 🥴
Is that the same "rule of law" that these lunatics are attempting to defund, destroy, replace? They sure know how to quote shit when it suits THEM and their narrative.
Fucking morons, the lot of them!
He was guilty and he will have a criminal record unless Trump pardons him.
No, I don't care to discuss your whataboutisms.
⭐⭐Article 72 says that THE PRESIDENT shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of ANY person convicted of ANY offence.
NOWHERE DOES IT SAY, He needs approval from ANYONE else!
NOWHERE DOES IT SAY, That said person cannot be an ACQUAINTANCE.
NOWHERE DOES IT SAY, That said decision has to be justified EITHER!
The President has acted accordingly, within HIS rights, given to HIM by the People, Congress, and Constitution of the United States.
PERIOD!!
Under the Constitution of India (Article 72), the President of India can grant a pardon or reduce the sentence of a convicted person, particularly in cases involving capital punishment. A similar and parallel power vests in the governors of each state under Article 161. The president is empowered with the power to pardon under Article 72 of the Indian Constitution. Article 72 says that the president shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence. The meaning of these terms is as follows:
WELL, IF HE CAN SELL US OUT TO RUSSIA AND COLLUDE WITH THE UKRAINE, WHY NOT BECOME THE EMPEROR OF INDIA?
Oh that's fuckin funny right there!
Guess there is a first time for everything, don't blame me, blame Google. That's the first time I've noted that the search engine totally fucked up!
By the way, you forgot his collusion and or selling out to CHI-NAH!
only registered users can see external links
I wish him the best of luck and have full confidence that he will succeed in his endeavor to prove his innocence on appeal with a more fair jury and judge.
How about...
Unfair, biased and harsh orders from the Judge towards Roger, stomping on his 1st amendment right to Free Speech during the trial?
OR
The fact that the jury foreperson was biased as evidenced by her social media posts? Perhaps as a biased person she should have done the right thing and recused herself. Therefore Roger did NOT recieve a fair trial!
Or
How about the fact that he was being charged with crimes stemming from a PROVEN TO BE - illegal, unwarranted, frankly bullshit investigation called "Russia Collusion"? In light of that, questioning him should have NEVER taken place, in the first place...
Or
Because he's an old man?
Or
That Roger is a known friend and associate?
Or
All of the above? 🤔
That all being said, Roger Stone remains a convicted man, and just will not serve time. So, who cares!
Care to discuss some of the even bigger winners pardoned by some of the past Presidents? Care to put some of them in contrast with Roger Stone?
How about a known terrorist that had bombed and killed numerous American people? That's CURRENTLY the treasurer of that marxists organization known as B.L.M. Wanna compare Roger Stone to that person?
I mean, if we are going to be SO outraged at this act, I think it's only fair, to show how people 10x worse than Roger Stone, have been pardoned and or had their sentences commuted.
What! Don't wanna do that? Might it just illustrate further, the ridiculousness of the outrage?
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
Oh and Disneyland reopened yesterday and the roller coasters were in full swing...
Americans deserve to hear why McConnell did not trust them with the evidence that he and 11 other congressional leaders received in a confidential briefing in September.
The Washington Post reports that during that briefing McConnell “made clear to the administration that he would consider any effort by the White House to challenge the Russians publicly an act of partisan politics.”
HE'S A COMMUNIST
Ukraine became independent again when the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991.
This country has been annexed so many times
only registered users can see external links
I thought they all agreed that they would endorse the winner.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
I thought he would continue being the coward that we’ve all come to love!
The world has united against a common enemy yet again. I just know that that would not of happened if Trump were president.
Ok,here is a page explaining the meaning of impeachment,and how it works.
BUT I read NOTHING explaining how it works when the President is NO LONGER IN THE OFFICE?
When Nixon was impeached,he resigned so the impeachment wasn't needed.Trump was ousted by a highly questionable election,so I see no need to put the country thru the stress,the exspense for nothing.Trump is 74 years old,he would be 78 if he ran again for 2024,not to mention he would be 82 or so at the end of his term.If you don't think age matters,just watch biden try to speak,he loose's his words,stammers,and you know if he can't talk,he is probably having trouble thinking as well.
However, piles and piles of evidence and many witnesses have come out, corroborating suspicions that he and his associates were planning months before the election, to claim fraud, as part of a plan to steal the election.
The basis of it was a false elector scheme, in several states, where they planned to replace the duly certified Presidential Electors, with their own false electors, saying they represented the 'real' outcome of the election.
They even used falsified documents for that. That's the definition of FRAUD.
Sending a mob to the capital, was only a small part of the plan to overturn the election.
Nothing this UNCONSTITUTIONAL has ever taken place in the US. Trump should be charged for sedition at the minimum, but there is ample evidence to charge him with TREASON.
LOCK HIM UP!
LOCK HIM UP!
LOCK HIM UP!
LOCK HIM UP!
LOCK HIM UP!
LOCK HIM UP!
LOCK HIM UP!
only registered users can see external links
“We have all the pieces of the puzzle. You talk about evidence. We have enough evidence to put everyone in prison for life, 300 and some million people, we have that back all the way to November and December.”
How the hell can 300+ million people have voted illegally?
Only 155 million people voted at all (81,268,924 for Biden and 74,216,154 for Trump).
In 2020, there were only 258.3 million adults in the US.
Does the idiot want to send 41.7 million children to prison?
By the way, voter fraud is a serious offense, but life imprisonment?
The maximum penalty for 'Wrongful Voting' / 'Voter Fraud' is 5 years.
Parenthetically, for organizing an insurrection, the maximum penalty is DEATH.
BUT That damn pillow guy did more harm than good. IF he had the evidence, why the hell did he hold it so long? It is to late. EVEN if it was all proven correct and Trump was the winner of the election, there is no precedent in history or laws written to direct how to react to or rectify the mess we have now.
only registered users can see external links
"When former President Donald Trump ran for re-election in 2020, the party didn’t release a platform laying out Republican priorities; Trump was the platform."
How about telling your voters what your party plans to do?
Even Putin tells his voters (who have no choice) what his policies are.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
So tell me again how being on the verge of war with both RUSSIA AND CHINA in a little over a year after Trump left is so much better than if he had stayed????
Our weakened, liberal democrat led America. and it's can't take of themselves, nato allies don't stand a chance with BOTH of those after us.
It is time we ditch nato and take care of our own damn country and stop letting others drag us into their skirmishes.
So I'm saying it's about time we should give the lizard people, a little bit more respect, thankyou.
-Bernie Sanders
Every one is fighting over bull shit and no one is watching what is going on
Trump don’t care anymore and I don’t blame him
And Biden has not yet taken over yet
So it’s a free for all every man for him self
--------------------------------------- added after 45 seconds
At least that’s the rules I’m playing by
--------------------------------------- added after 64 seconds
Correction: Kinda agreeing.
BUT His administration is also building a wall in the right place. Around the capitol.If you can't drain the swamp,damn it up so it can't leak into the rest of the country anymore!
And people are so friggen dumb. All 50 state capitols are on alert. 1000's of troops being put around them.
Thinning resources to protect other potential targets. Charlotte,a major finacial hub city,is sending cops to washington. Leaving the city more vunerable to attack. IF you can't get the leader,who will stop them from interfering with the money?
New Comment Go to top