 | YouTube is the number one video-sharing platform in the world with more than 95% of the internet population using it. It provides videos ranging from silly pranks, heartwarming stories, news about the latest global issues, people's personal interests, information about cutting edge science, genuine debates between people who disagree but want to understand each other, lies to serve a political agenda, the ramblings of mentally ill people and everything in between.
YouTube has an algorithm that focuses on overall audience satisfaction, over providing people with a neutral, objective or balanced perspective on the world. It suggests videos based on how users with similar viewing patterns to your own reacted. It personalizes its recommendations based on channels to which you’ve already subscribed. This poses a risk of limiting people's access to information, that they didn't know they would have wanted to know.
I created this topic to exchange informative and educational videos with other people, who might have been algorithmically limited to other content than I am myself. I do suggest to limit this topic to informative and educational content, because there are already enough other topics for fun and questionable stuff.
Although politics and climate change can be categorized as informative and educational, there are already enough other topics debating politics and climate change. Science in general isn't political, neither is (or should) philosophy. Religion is associated with politics, but honest debates on this topic are not political, in my opinion. If you think these subjects are all terribly boring, I don't agree, but then this topic is not for you. That's OK. |
I had to pause it though; reacting to your video isn't really 'working'.
while still ramping up your electricity bill.
than the issue they wanted to address.
I see it as a joke about your values; instead of caring that so many people get shot
in your country, you care about fearmongering over DEI.
I would call all of it 'educational', but thanks for your contribution.
You must have spent a lot of time to find these jewels.
Any point to it, though?
Without us, you'd be forced to actually work for a living.
You are just showing that you don't know anything.
"When you are rich they let you do it!". He obviously wasn't rich. Know your place kid.
that are very easy to debunk, over and over to convince people of their ideas.
They made a series of movies of kids in a classroom, who get taught evolution,
very badly, so the kids can seem to outsmart this fake teacher.
That part is actually realistic, because there are lots of teachers who are required
to teach something that they don't believe themselves, which results in them doing
a GOD AWFUL job at it. So, here is a great real teacher, correcting this awful fake one.
The WORST Evolution Class on Earth - Part 1 | Reacteria
only registered users can see external links
How NOT to Teach Evolution - Creation Class Part 2 | Reacteria
only registered users can see external links
The WORST WAY to Teach Human Evolution - Creationist Class Part 3 | Reacteria
only registered users can see external links
IT'S PAUL OR NOTHING NOW! - Creationist Class Part 4 | Reacteria
only registered users can see external links
The content of the video is good, but I suspected right away that the girl is AI.
Did you notice the signs? I asked ChatGPT about it, and it confirms my suspicion.
In this case, it was probably not with a reason to deceive, but just to not have to find
or pay for a real presenter.
I encourage watching this, if you are a woman, if you have any women in your life,
or just want to know more about women specific health.
Thanks for your contribution.
only registered users can see external links
I think people have just figured out a way to fool scientist. That hammer looks very similar to hammers used to drive rail road spikes, just smaller.
The object known as the “London Hammer” or “London Artifact” is a hammer made of iron and wood, allegedly found in London, Texas in the 1930s by a couple walking near Red Creek. Its wooden handle was protruding from a rock-like concretion.
The hammerhead is about 6 inches long (15 cm) and made of an iron alloy with a reported composition of around 96–97% iron, with traces of chlorine and sulfur. The wood handle shows some partial mineralization or carbonization, which can happen gradually over time.
The hammer is currently exhibited at Carl Baugh’s Creation Evidence Museum, which promotes it as evidence of ancient human civilization.
⚠️ What Is Not Scientifically Supported
Claims that the hammer is “millions or hundreds of millions of years old” are not based on any reliable scientific dating of the hammer itself. There is no verified scientific analysis proving it was encased in genuinely ancient strata.
The often-quoted narrative that it was encased in 400-million-year-old Ordovician rock is inaccurate, since:
The hammer was likely found in a loose rock or nodule, not in situ within dated bedrock. This means its association with “ancient” layers cannot be confirmed.
Concretion (minerals hardening around an object) is a well-known process that can form quickly — within decades or centuries, not millions of years. Many modern objects are found encased in limestone-like mineral crusts because minerals in water deposit and harden around them.
There is no properly documented geological context (exact location, layer, or stratigraphic record) confirming the hammer lay embedded in ancient rock before retrieval. The original finders never documented its stratigraphic position.
✅ What Scientists and Skeptics Conclude
Most experts consider the hammer to be a 20th-century or late 19th-century tool — stylistically consistent with mining or machinist hammers from that era.
The concretion around the hammer is likely not as old as nearby rock formations. Instead, it probably formed after someone lost or discarded the hammer, and minerals in the local environment hardened around it. This explanation is supported by geologists familiar with limestone concretions.
The only reliable way to estimate the hammer’s age would be through carbon dating of the wood handle, which, if done, points to a much younger age (~hundreds of years), not millions. However, comprehensive independent dating has not been widely published.
Only copy/pasting "spark plug in a rock" in Google, gives the AI result, before you even have to look further:
"A "spark plug in a rock" refers to the famous Coso Artifact, a supposed 500,000-year-old geode containing what looks like a modern spark plug, sparking theories of time travel or ancient advanced civilizations, but generally accepted as a 1920s spark plug naturally encased in a faster-forming concretion (not a true geode)"
Any time you investigate claims like this, you will find out that they either did no radiometric dating, or they did the incorrect type of radiometric dating resulting in very inaccurate results, and then stupid or dishonest people making an incorrect conclusion.
And it features Robert Dunn, from the Aging Wheels channel.
Best video you have ever shared! Thanks!
There is a well-known documentary about this car:
"Who killed the electric car?"
only registered users can see external links
Here is a video about that documentary:
only registered users can see external links
Or the guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
Or the guy has expectations for cars that doesn't match.
If you want to take your wife and four kids shopping, the McLaren SLR sucks.
I would think her hotness would make the car more desirable.
New Comment Go to top