Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#94
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Cum isn't stored in the balls!!! 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
Storming a church and interrupting the peaceable assembly of others can be charged as a crime, because it is.
"It is a criminal act to intentionally interfere with the expression of free speech of others." Don Lemon was just arrested for covering an anti-ICE protest. If there is ONE thing that should be protected by the 1st Amendment, it's the right to REPORT on protests.
"I Looked at the New US Food Guidelines And Something Doesn’t Add Up"
only registered users can see external links
One example; the messaging was: "We are ending the war on protein!".
Like there are not shelves stacked with products marketing "EXTRA PROTEIN".
Why is everything your administration does SO INCREDIBLY STUPID?
If you want to stay healthy, listen to specialists.
Do not listen to your administration, because they DON'T listen to specialists.
Your administration listens to lobbyists and people with brain-worms (literal or figurative).
The milk and meat lobby has significantly delayed and distorted public understanding
of the health risks of animal-product consumption, contributing to preventable disease.
Men can't even work anymore, they don't have the strength to lift things, they depend on machines, they can't think because their brains are malnourished. We need carbs and protein in our diets to get our humans back up to a level they can function. Weak people means weak country.
a food supplement, it would possibly be risky to use that in large quantities.
Products like protein bars and protein shakes are considered food in the EU,
not food supplements, so they should be safe.
I think the whole protein hype is nonsense. Our consumer information program "Keuringsdienst van waarde" (Inspection service of value) researched it and they conclude that almost everyone gets enough protein in their food. Only top athletes might benefit from same extra.
And did you check that they contained all essential amino acids?
Often it's just whey protein, a byproduct of cheese-making, which they had
lots of trouble selling, until they marketed the shit out of protein products.
The body can create creatine itself, but they say it helps produce energy for short, intense bursts of activity. Think of it as a rapid fuel reserve for your muscles and brain. If you work out vigorously, I can imagine it would help.
Short answer: **No — that explanation is largely false and mixes a few half-truths with outright misinformation.** Let’s unpack it cleanly.
---
## What’s wrong in that statement
### 1. **Creatine does NOT require 75 g of glucose to work**
* Creatine uptake into muscle is **not dependent on a massive insulin spike**.
* Insulin can *slightly* enhance creatine transport, but **normal meals already provide enough insulin**.
* Research shows creatine works perfectly well **with water alone**.
👉 You do **not** need 75 g of glucose (that’s ~300 calories of sugar) for creatine to be effective.
---
### 2. **More expensive creatine ≠ better creatine**
* The gold standard is **creatine monohydrate**.
* It’s cheap, stable, and extremely well-researched.
* Added glucose does **not** make it higher quality — it just makes it a carb supplement plus creatine.
If anything, “expensive creatine with tons of sugar” is often **marketing fluff**.
---
### 3. **Creatine is NOT injected**
This is a big red flag.
* Creatine is taken **orally** (powder, capsule).
* There is **no standard or legitimate practice of injecting creatine**.
* The body absorbs creatine through the gut → bloodstream → muscles.
If someone says “inject creatine,” they either misspoke badly or don’t understand the topic.
---
### 4. **Creatine doesn’t directly “repair muscles”**
Creatine:
* Increases **phosphocreatine stores**
* Improves **short-burst power output**
* Allows **more reps, heavier loads**
* Indirectly supports muscle growth by improving training quality
It does **not** directly repair muscle tissue like protein or calories do.
---
### 5. **Insulin spikes that big are unnecessary and often counterproductive**
* 75 g of glucose daily just for creatine can:
* Add unnecessary fat
* Spike blood sugar
* Be harmful for insulin sensitivity (especially long-term)
Top athletes absolutely do **not** rely on sugar bombs just to make creatine work.
---
## What’s actually true (the real science)
✅ Creatine monohydrate works on its own
✅ Taking it with meals is sufficient
✅ Insulin *can* help uptake slightly, but normal eating covers this
✅ No glucose minimum exists
✅ No injection required
✅ Cheap creatine is just as effective
---
## Bottom line
That explanation is **scientifically incorrect** and includes:
* A fake glucose requirement
* A misunderstanding of insulin
* A false claim about injection
* Confusion about muscle repair
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes
cally designed to cause a significant, measurable spike in blood sugar and a corresponding surge in insulin, often used to diagnose diabetes or insulin resistance. This amount is typically given as a liquid drink, causing a faster, more intense spike than a similar amount of carbohydrates eaten in solid food.
--------------------------------------- added after 11 minutes
Yes, consuming 75 grams of glucose is a standardized, high-carbohydrate load specifically designed to cause a significant, measurable spike in blood sugar and a corresponding surge in insulin, often used to diagnose diabetes or insulin resistance. This amount is typically given as a liquid drink, causing a faster, more intense spike than a similar amount of carbohydrates eaten in solid food.
Like I said, I just asked ChatGPT.
Stop letting a machine do it, and think for yourself. There are far better and more reliable sources of info than a software written by individuals with personal prejudices and agendas.
and it uses algorithms to figure out logical connections between ALL that data.
Are you doing that?
This was one time that I didn't have a clue about the truth of this, and I didn't care to learn, because it has no use for me. That's when I just ask ChatGPT.
I didn't even read most of it, just formatted it, AND I CLEARLY SAID THAT.
I mostly use ChatGPT as a factchecker. If ChatGPT is incorrect, I know enough to know that, on most subjects that we are taling about, because
I get news from many sources. When I ask ChatGPT something I care about,
I always ask it for it's sources and confirm what it answered.
So, how do you do it? Do you ask Google or some other search engine for links to information? Do you admit that all those search engines can have the exact same problem of being programmed by individuals with prejudices and agendas?
If you are finding information with a search engine, you are reading ONE source that can be completely biased. If you are finding information with AI,
it is usually based on multiple sources. That can be more accurate, but it can also be completely wrong. It all depends on your own knowledge and critical thinking skills to separate the lies and nonsense from the truth.
Grok is written by individuals with personal prejudices and agendas, ChatGPT is NOT, or a least FAR LESS. There is clear evidence that Elon Musk himself is involved in manipulating Grok, but that is exactly why people on your side favor it over AI's from more neutral organized companies.
By the way; if you think that AI is such a threat to the truth, why do you not BERATE Trump, for letting the techbros fill your country with AI datacenters and Trump wanting to forbid ALL regulation that would prevent them from destroying the truth for ever? Do you like being lied to?
I want strict regulation to make sure that no one can use fake pictures or video for propaganda, with heavy penalties if they do. The Trump regime just changed a photo of civil rights attorney and activist Nekima Levy Armstrong, to make it look like she was crying, while she was not. I consider that a crime. I DON'T like being lied to.
You're making a "Correlation–causation fallacy".
You are correct in thinking that sissy/weak men care about their health more,
but you are reversing the logic. It's not the healthy food that made them sissy/weak,
it's being sissy/weak that makes men care about their health.
Together with the manly culture of meat and BBQ, that makes you relate unhealthy food with "real men" and healthy food with "sissy/weak" men. That's irrational thinking.
Understand that there is lots of marketing behind the idea of manly men. They advertise it with a big hairy man, on his ranch, cutting up a dead animal, putting it on the grill, in a leather apron, covered in smoke, drinking beer, with his mates. And for a while, that's all a lot of fun, good eating, good times. But if that makes you eat unhealthy everyday, you end up fat, out of breath, with diminished heart function from blocked arteries, elevated cholesterol and hypertension, requiring medication with side-effects, possibly turning diabetic, and all medical bills associated with it. It was all very manly for a while, but it can turn that big burly man into a weakling, who cannot do his job anymore and probably dies before his retirement.
Is it manly, when he leaves his wife without his income and lots of medical debt?
Studies show that top athletes perform much better on a fully plant based diet, than on meat, even high quality unprocessed meat that is considered healthy. It takes more effort to balance a plant based diet, to compensate for some deficiencies (only Vitamin B12 cannot be compensated without supplements), but then it provides the body with a much more complete source of nutrients. It opens up all the arteries to utilize the full power of the heart, which make top athletes perform their best.
Actually that manly American food culture turns people malnourished.
All those jiggly asses you see walking around are STARVING for vitamins (Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Carotenoids), minerals (Potassium, Magnesium), fiber, anti-oxidants, healthy fatty acids, complex carbohydrates, prebiotics & gut-supporting compounds. They're not strong and tough, they're dying.
Of course, I'm not turning this knowledge into full practice. I still eat meat (but a bit less), because I like it. A long healthy life is not worth a lot, if you need to suffer every day to achieve it. I have no interest in sports, I just don't want to suffer illness and die young. That requires a healthIER diet and some exercise. That's not much of a sacrifice. A well-balanced diet is much more interesting than only hamburgers and steaks. I like variety and eating food from all over the world. Especially Asian countries have developed a diet that is both healthy and great in taste and variety.
“Variety’s the very spice of life, that gives it all its flavour.” — William Cowper
This was his way of emphasizing what some call a “color‑blind” approach to race,
the idea that if we stopped highlighting racial categories in everyday interactions,
racial divisions could diminish over time. He is not a representative for most black people in the US. This contrasts with the majority view among Black Americans, who see racism as both systemic and structural, requiring active attention and solutions.
You're making an "appeal to authority" fallacy. The reasoning goes like:
“Morgan Freeman says stop talking about race → therefore, that is the best way
to reduce racism.”
It’s fallacious because his celebrity status does not confer special insight into
systemic sociology.
I think it's just an argument from people who want people to stop talking about racism.
The reality is that racism is reemerging in alarming ways, more openly than in previous decades, making silence both unrealistic and dangerous.
Ignoring race doesn’t make racism disappear. It can hide inequalities,
invalidate experiences, maintain the status quo, and erase cultural identity.
Real change requires acknowledging race, while addressing inequities.
I remember when it was bad to believe in the doctrine of “separate but equal.” Now, it is perfectly acceptable, so long as your skin is a politically correct shade, and not too pale, of course.
Indeed, the audacity of calling a country that elected a half-black man to be POTUS not once but twice, and where the wealthiest woman in the world is Oprah Winfrey, and thousands of black men and women belong to the millionaires club, is palpable. It is staggeringly mind numbing to hear many insisting it is now worse for black people in this nation than it was in 1925!
What rot!
But, do go one. Please. Perpetuate that myth. Keep claiming America is racist merely because white people live here. Ignore the unapologetic racism of Leftist activists and black separatist race grifters who get richer with each manufactured outrage, which oddly always seems to be the fault of whitey for some reason.
This is racism is being projected onto those who have committed the cardinal sin of being born white, by those who profit most from the division it creates. Up is down, war is peace, and ignorance is power in a world turned upside down by those who, failing to find racism in our society, create it themselves and then reward themselves richly for calling it out. It is a world in which the only people who can now be safely discriminated against are the ones who are melanin lacking, and those who profit from discrimination this laugh on the way to the bank.
Why is your president constantly publicly insulted the intelligence of Jasmine Crockett, who knows all of the law from memory and obviously speaks and reads at a much higher level than the president himself?
Can you point me to some of those 'Leftist race grifters', who are pushing 'Black separatism'?
A grifter is someone who makes money, influence, or attention by deceiving people, especially by pretending to be sincere, principled, or aligned with a cause they don’t genuinely believe in. There is a lot of it on the right, because right-wing ideology favors the wealthy. It is openly documented how almost all right-wing media, old and new, is funded by billions of dollars from the wealthy. To a lesser extend there is corporate liberal media, funded by liberal billionaires, but there is none of that on the LEFT. The left threatens billionaires, because we think they should not exist. They are not funding a movement that wants to tax them out of existence.
When I accuse the US of being racist, I have lots of other examples than that white people live there. Like the fact that ICE is racially profiling people to attack, consistently on a large scale, while we are speaking.
Being born white is not a sin, it's a privilege. No one is accusing me of having low IQ and being incompetent, based on my skin color, because I'm white. If I was black in America, I would now have to prove I am qualified for my job, based solely on being part of a GROUP, that was hired while DEI existed, without being INDIVIDUALLY assessed. Being treated as a ethnic group, instead of as an individual, is discrimination.
If melanin people are discriminated against, than why are white people on average still SO MUCH BETTER OFF, than black people on average? You can only explain that with racism or by engaging in racism. Which one will you pick?
The wealthiest woman in the world is NOT Oprah Winfrey, it is Alice Walton, the Walmart heiress, with an estimated fortune of around $101 billion. Oprah Winfrey’s net worth is about $3.2 billion. Funny how you put sexism on top of racism, and making a separate category for women. The wealthiest PERSON in the world is Elon Musk, with ~$700 billion+. He is white, from South Africa, from a line of apartheid supporting white wealthy people. He is also known from his weird waving, that exactly looked like two Nazi salutes, during your PRESIDENT'S campaign. No one on the side of your president has acknowledged this and condemned this, and Elon Musk was allowed to go into your government's finances and do whatever he wanted with it. Are you going to deny that those were intended as Nazi salutes, or are you going to say that Nazi salutes are not disqualifying for such an important position?
Race wouldn't be near the issue it is if Black people themselves would stop making it 1.
Otherwise, you are arguing that 'blacks' are doing that, because they are black,
which is: racism.
No, race is an issue, because you cannot stop making it an issue.
You have no arguments against anything else I said, so racism is real.
If I turned on the news and the majority of criminals displayed on the screen were white, um,i wouldn't think blacks were the majority ,nothing there to enforce that observation.
If I were to veiw the population of the nearest jail and they were all white, um, blacks aren't the issue,nothing there to enforce the observation.
So HOW are people of other races bringing attention onto themselves?
One of you is denying that have any problems and the other is calling them
all criminals. How am I supposed to take you lot seriously?
You're not dealing in reality. Your "facts" change according to what you want
to argue for. Discuss you ideas with each other first, and come to me with your combined conclusion, about how black people are either incredibly privileged or
how they are awfully struggling.
If you are saying that they are privileged AND struggling, then you are just saying that it's because they are black, which is: racism.
In any case, if that WOULD be the reality, how the fuck is IGNORING race then going to solve anything? IF race WAS the ACTUAL problem, then how stupid
is ignoring it? Your whole support for ignoring race, proves that wrong.
You obviously care about the problem, so explain why you don't want to fix it.
only registered users can see external links
of abolishing their own monarchy, while their king has almost no power.
About 31–37 % of Dutch people want The Netherlands to be a republic.
I'm not one of them, because I see how awful your republic is.
I don't want ONE person to have so much power to only represent one group of people, and fuck over the rest, while they were voted in by only 31,6 % of the people who are eligible to vote.
I want all voters to represented in a compromise. And I want a cabinet that lays down their jobs, when people lose trust in them. None of your presidents has ever done that, no matter how low their approval had become.
Seriously, why would anyone want a kill that killed his wives?
I am exactly saying that I DON'T want a stupid king to rule over us,
but a government of people with brains. We have that, much more than YOU.
OK, Trump ONLY killed one wife.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
OH now it all makes sense,A democrat judge.
U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett
Who appointed judge Margaret Garnett?
Joseph R. Biden
Nominated by Joseph R. Biden on July 11, 2023, to a seat vacated by Vincent Louis Briccetti. Confirmed by the Senate on November 28, 2023, and received commission on January 9, 2024.
only registered users can see external links
I would assume he was a flight risk, But didn't get much punishment.
when you understand how fugging hard it often is.
I let this brilliant piece of comedy support my point:
only registered users can see external links
Irritable Male Syndrome
only registered users can see external links
The term irritable male syndrome (IMS) is used in scientific and popular texts to describe a pattern of irritability and mood changes linked to hormonal fluctuations in males. However, it is not an officially recognized medical diagnosis in major clinical classifications like the DSM-5 or ICD-11; it remains a descriptive concept rather than a standardized clinical condition.
I would say that irritable male syndrome is the clearest reason for the existence of MAGA that I ever heard. The whole movement is based on primitive gut feelings, that things in the US are not going well, without any rational thinking about the reasons for why things in the US are not going well. If you look at MAGA crowds, it's clear that ALL these men have some form of hormonal imbalance. Either they are testosteron bombs who are frustrated for women not being interested in them, or they are middle-aged men in their penopause.
That's all rational reasons to feel depressed about the state of THEIR country.
It's not your country, because your side has always hated America.
You want America to be like Putin's Russia and Erdoğan's Turkey.
Lets take a look at some apartments in new york.
only registered users can see external links
1750 a month
and then compare them to apartments in RUSSIA.
only registered users can see external links
750 a month, a 1000 dollars less than new york and MUCH larger in most cases.
NOW, Please remind me what political party has been running new york and for how long?
Oh,let me google that for you to save time
"City government is dominated by the Democratic Party, which also normally attracts majority support within the city in State, Congressional, and Presidential elections. The suffrage has been extended in stages since the founding of the state: African Americans (men only) received the vote in 1870 and women in 1920."
Democrats have been trying to make America in russia and theres the proof in those 2 links. looks nearly the same to me,except the democrats have got the cost much higher.Who struggles under the higher democrat prices in new york? the poor. DUH,
Moscow Average Annual: 1.25 Million RUB ($1,000+ monthly net).
Moscow Living Wage (Bachelor): RUB 75k-100k/month (approx. $800-$1,000 USD at recent rates).
In Summary:
Expect substantially higher dollar figures for salaries in New York, but factor in the much higher cost of living in NYC versus Moscow; however, even with cost adjustments, New York generally offers greater real purchasing power.
Give it a rest, Phart.
USD RUB
500 USD 39,000 RUB
1000 USD 78,000 RUB
2000 USD 156,000 RUB
5000 USD 390,000 RUB
Which relevant economic principle, that you have ever advocated for,
is championed by Russian politics and opposed by Democrats?
And how is that affecting rent prices for working class people?
In one post you are praising Russians for keeping rent low (which is nonsense,
if you consider their spending power) and in the other post you are accusing Democrats of trying to make America in Russia.
What is it?
Still, those Democrats did some things to keep rent prices from not escalating to even more ridiculous levels. Do you think that Republicans would have done anything?
Of course not, they would call that 'socialism' or 'communism'.
There are no capitalist solutions to a capitalist problem.
That's why the working class in New York voted for Zohran Mamdani.
You want America to be like Putin's Russia and Erdoğan's Turkey."
This is what got me comparing russia to the us, The rent is similar
Not being sent to die in a dictator's senseless wars is higher on my priority list.
New Comment Go to top