Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!

Tired of ads
on this site?

QUESTIONABLE STUFF 😵‍💫

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#91

Started by bella! [Ignore] 13,Aug,23 07:15  other posts
This thread is for questionable content. WHY? Just because! I am someone who enjoys the Hodge Twins. YEP, the Hodge Twins. They probably make the hairs on the back of a WOKE person stand straight up! Anyway.....

New Comment       Rating: 0  


Comments:
By phart [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 08:02 other posts 
You know, it is sadly very obvious that zelenski does not want peace, he needs to be voted out of his job or there will be nothing left of ukraine.
only registered users can see external links
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 01:06 other posts 
What more should one expect from a former stand-up act? I mean, Ukraine elected a for-real comedian, for cripes sake.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 08:15 other posts 
Should he have auditioned on “The Apprentice”?
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 15:12 other posts 
To do what?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 18:06 other posts 
Laugh at an idiot
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 19:19 other posts 
Do you mean the “idiot” billionaire who managed to get himself elected POTUS twice, who donated land for public golf courses in locations where only the elitists had private clubs, and who created tens of thousands of private sector jobs before going into public office? The same “idiot” who Democrats couldn’t wait to be photographed with all through the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s? The “idiot” who negotiated the end of hostilities in at least 8 wars, some of those having lasted as long as 30 years, ones the Left and First World progressives have ignored for that long? The same “idiot” who bascially ended racial bias in major Florida golf courses? The same “idiot” who, unlike Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, AOC, and numerous other Jackasses refuses to use his public office to enrich himself?

What has he ever done to you to make you hate him? How much damage has he done directly to your life?
By phart [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 19:30 other posts 
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 08:27 other posts 
I agree, this is pure entertainment. It is hilarious that someone can think this.
By phart [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 08:57 other posts 
I know, how can cat or anyone else ignore a mans entire lifes work before he puts his own life aside to try to save his country? Yep , pure entertainment.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 06:55 other posts 
He didn't, and it's fucking ridiculous to think so.

He ran for president for self-aggrandizement and then found out that too many people are actually stupid enough to vote for him. He never wanted to be president, but his narcissism prevented him from quitting. Then he got hooked
on people worshiping him. It's so ridiculous that no one ever came up with a story like that, but it's real life. It's your stupidity that made it possible.

In 2024, he was forced to keep it up, to escape his own crimes.
He is now on a rampage vengeance campaign to hurt everyone who elected him.
You're just dumb enough to not understand when he tells you.

By phart [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 07:21 other posts 
he was looking at running for president in the 90's best i can remember.

oops 87
Trump, head of The Trump Organization since 1971, first dabbled in presidential politics in the early summer of 1987.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 17:09 other posts 
OK, he is narcissistic enough to think he needs to be president.
The problem is that you agree with him.
"refuses to use his public office to enrich himself?"
Are you talking about Trump?

Enriching himself was his second goal, besides staying out of prison.
Trump is putting African dictators to shame, with his record corruption.
With every tariff announcement, his friends and family made a fortune
on the stock market, with insider trading, which is a crime. If he didn't
control the DOJ and the FBI, this would be investigated right now.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 18:07 other posts 
Investigating him, for what? Being unlikeable or unliked is not a criminal offense.

And, what has he done to you to earn such baseless loathing? You were fine with him until he ran for POTUS the first time.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 05:30 other posts 
Are you kidding, Trump has been a criminal all his life.
I knew him to be a piece of shit, long before he ran for president.
I didn't know the extend of it, because he was keeping under the radar, but as soon as he went public, I started investigating him and found an almost unending pile of shit, that each on their own should discredit him to ever vote for him. His character alone should be a reason, but you support him despite everything combined.
Either you have been living under a rock, or you just like horrible people.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 13:04 other posts 
You don’t know the extent of it, but somehow, you still know.

You started “investigating,” like some sort of Sherlock Holmes, but with the internet solely as your source, no doubt.

Yeah. We all know that everything on the internet is true, accurate, and based solely on facts and reality. It’s a totally reliable source on which to form opinions regarding politics, culture, and science.

(Rolling my eyes right now)

That was sarcasm, by the way. I had to alert you of that as this medium is not conducive to expressing it in clear fashion.

My, my, my. The derangement syndrome is real! It is absolutely stunning the amount of mental gymnastics those suffering from it will go through to justify their outrageous unsubstantiated claims based on rumors, misinformation, and propaganda! The street lawyers and basement detectives spewing this “information” are amazingly brilliant, all of them able to draw accurate and insightful conclusions from mere gossip, lies, innuendo, and rumor!

I can’t help but wonder if Hillary Clinton also got the same level of investigatory attention from you amateur sleuths, or is this all just sour grapes being pressed simply because she lost to him and you people just cannot let it go.

I find it telling that none of you had a problem with him before he replaced the (D) behind his name with an (R). The rage that was expressed after that happened is palpable. The desperation for extracting vengeance for daring to “leave the plantation” is driving force behind it all!

Nothing is too low nor unethical, just as long as “we get Trump.”

Wow.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 17:19 other posts 
Investigating, like looking up information about him.
Do you have anything else than the internet?
Did you ever do business with him? I guess not.

The internet is a jungle with everything between absolute lies and accurate science. It's up to your critical thinking skills and knowledge to know what's what.
It's easy to recognize when right-wing media is lying. If they are very vague,
you can be sure that they are lying. When journalists are adding lots of details,
it makes it easy to verify those claims.

I don't like Hilary Clinton. Why bring her up? It's a 'whataboutism'. In any case, she is horrible, but not nearly as vile, evil, criminal and corrupt as Trump.

I don't care about a D or an R, because there are lots of D's that I hate.
That's the thinking of an American, who is used to only 2 parties. We have 27. That requires lots more political insight.

Trump was an asshole when he was a Democrat too. You should learn to look beyond party lines. It makes you an easy victim for scamming.
By dgraff [Ignore] 16,Dec,25 09:58 other posts 
I’m just going to go ahead and say it
Pal you got some kinda nerve to come to Bella’s forum thread trying to spread your communist hatred and your bull shit and shame on cat to agree with any thing you say take your commie bull shit and hit the high way peddle that crap 💩 in your own country
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Dec,25 11:20 other posts 
Dgraff, shame on me? Did you not read that Phart is the one that started this conversation? Did you not read that Lookatmine2 made the follow-up comments? And, did you forget that this thread, authored by Bella!, is called Questionable Stuff? And that it was started for the expressed purpose of questioning “stuff”?
My question to you is, “Who gave you the right to comment on anyone’s right to post here as long as Bella! allows it? Ananas is not a communist. He’s a socialist with opinions that are relevant to the political situation in this country. Our politics don’t just affect this country. Right or wrong we influence the politics of the world. He has as much right to opine as you. Perhaps more. His views are well thought out. At the very least, he has solutions to our problems unlike from those that just criticize.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 09:28 other posts 
He sexually molested women. He is a convicted felon. He’s using his office to enrich his family by billions of dollars. He’s trashing the Federal Government. He’s put the health of this country in jeopardy with his pick of health secretary. He’s destroying our economy with his tariff policies. That’s more than enough.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:03 other posts 
Hearsay and unsubstantiated accusations are not convictions.

Plus, where were your complaints while the Biden family were taking advantage of not only the Biden presidency, but also the Biden vice-presidency during the Obama regime? (D) gets a pass, while (R) is pilloried?

My, how our outrage becomes selective when the letters behind the names of those in office change!

Can your bias be any more obvious?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:07 other posts 
Jan 10, 2025 — Today, President-elect Trump was sentenced by a New York state court on 34 felony convictions. The following is a statement from Common ...
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:12 other posts 
Biden didn’t get a pass. He was pilloried during his whole presidency. But, I see you punted. You brought the old argument “Well, he did it too”. Stick to the present if we are going to discuss the failings of the worst president ever. This one. The one that took office on 1/20/2025. Anything else is history.
By phart [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:16 other posts 
how can you say something or someone is the worst if you can't compare them with previous?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:18 other posts 
I can’t? You’ve been asleep for the past 50 yrs?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:15 other posts 
Jan 10, 2025 — Today, President-elect Trump was sentenced by a New York state court on 34 felony convictions. The following is a statement from Common ...
Well?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:17 other posts 
In May 2023, while he was out of office, a jury found that Trump sexually abused and defamed writer E. Jean Carroll in 1996. He is still trying to get that verdict overturned.
Hearsay from his own mouth. That alone should have been enough for you
to not support him. If you don't see Trump BEING a horrible piece of shit,
on a daily basis, then you probably think behavior like that is normal.
That makes me question your morality and how you treat other people.
If you don't, then why do you think people like Trump should be president?
He has been given a 28 point agreement that was dictated by Russia. It is an agreement to give away a big part of Ukraine and to not create a defense force to prevent Russia
from taking even more of Ukraine, the next time they feel like attacking Ukraine.
How can you expect Zelensky to agree with that?

Let's say he does sign it, how long do you think the "peace" will last?
By phart [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 08:58 other posts 
How many more people have to die before you realize Putin wants Ukraine back and Will get it back if he has to kill every damn 1 of them?
Besides it may not matter anyway, Chernobyl is leaking due to a drone strike.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 17:42 other posts 
Doesn’t take much radiation to kill people, just alittle radiation and the insects die including the honey bee that pollinates the flowers that grow fruits and vegetables and the world will starve. There’s not enough fish and animals to feed the world, first to die will be the elderly, than the young, and the sick. Drink the cow milk that has mild radiation that will eventually kill you and so forth.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 19:10 other posts 
Bees are over-rated. There are literally hundreds of fly species that do more to pollinate than domesticated honey bees.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 05:49 other posts 
Domesticated honey bees are not the only bees that would go extinct, they will
probably be the last to go extinct. It's wild bees that you need to worry about.

Other pollinators, including flies, butterflies, beetles, birds, and bats, would continue
to help pollinate plants, but they generally do not pollinate as effectively as bees for many crops. Some plants that depend heavily on bees would produce much less fruit or seeds without them. Humans wouldn’t necessarily go extinct without bees, but agriculture, food diversity, and ecosystems would face major disruptions.

Would humans go extinct without bees?
only registered users can see external links

Did you actually READ anything, or are you just saying shit that you want to believe?
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 19:13 other posts 
The initial release from Chernobyl was gigantic. Most of us alive then survived it. The amount that is maybe being released today is equal to several dental x-rays.
By phart [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 21:02 other posts 
"Most of us alive then survived it."

Yep, you got it right, we survived it, that doesn't mean we or anyone else haven't had side effects from it.
I remember when that plant in japan messed up, the radiation levels in the grain in the midwest US went up. Thanks to the radiation traveling by jet stream.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 13,Dec,25 23:45 other posts 
Lookatmine2, when I say the bees will die, don’t you think most insects will die also, or do those other insects have radioactive suits on.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 04:10 other posts 
I’m not going to stress over it. There are far worse manmade things going on right now than a little increase in the background radiation.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:45 other posts 
I agree
The problem with Chernobyl is that it takes constant effort and money to KEEP
that radiation isolated.

only registered users can see external links

If they don't disassemble the reactor (which would be incredibly expensive), they will need to keep it covered for many hundreds to thousands of years, which would be incredibly expensive. Since Ukraine will probably not be able to pay for it, that means the rest of the world needs to, unless we want it to spread all over the earth.

At least Japan is capable of paying for their "little accident" themselves. They made the whole of earth a little bit more radioactive, resulting in accumulation of radioactivity in animals on top of the food chain (humans), but at least they are doing a reasonable job of containing it now. Still, it will probably cost them much more than nuclear power ever made them. That's the constant gamble being taken, by every country who is using nuclear power. The slightest accident or inevitable natural disaster can damage your country more than nuclear power ever benefited it.

If your country is ever at war, or there are some terrorist who don't like you, you could just paint a big bullseye on every nuclear plant, because that's the reality of it.

It's much better to use that big nuclear reactor in the sky for energy. It's cheap, it's safe, and it doesn't blow up for another 5 billion years.


By phart [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 22:40 other posts 
I have watched alot of youtube videos of river tables and stuff being made but THIS takes the cake.
Holy crap! What floors! that 1 is 5 foot deep!
only registered users can see external links
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Dec,25 09:31 other posts 
Wow. I love this
By dgraff [Ignore] 16,Dec,25 09:38 other posts 
I bet it is expensive it’s beautiful though


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 06:44 other posts 
Iowa's Abortion Law Turned Against This Conservative Mother
only registered users can see external links

One day, your pregnancy goes catastrophically wrong. The baby cannot live,
the doctors know it, you know it. The only question left is; DO YOU GET TO LIVE?
Suddenly, all those "pro-life" laws that you supported are the reason that the doctors
are too afraid to save your life.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 15,Dec,25 09:54 other posts 
What’s that old saying? You’ve made your bed, now lay on it.


By phart [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 13:35 other posts 
The apex of stupidity.
only registered users can see external links

Why is it people try to tie EVERYTHING to racism?
Are we going to have to change the color of BLACK PAINT to something "less offensive?
It mean it is is "Negro" in other languages.
The dark skys have always been referred to as "black skys"> Are we going to have to change that to?

When do people with some common sense stand up and say enough is a fucking nough and put the brakes on this BULLSHIT?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 08:21 other posts 
Phart, I copy/pasted this because it’s easier than writing it out myself.

The word "Negro" comes from Spanish/Portuguese for "black" but is now generally considered dated and often offensive in English, largely replaced by "Black" or "African American" since the 1960s, though it was once a term of dignity used by leaders like W.E.B. Du Bois; exceptions exist for historical contexts or specific organizations (like the UNCF or Negro Leagues Baseball Museum) where it's part of the official name.
By phart [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 09:17 other posts 
So is it ok to use Negroid when describing someone to a cop?

"What is the difference between negro and Negroid?
The suffix "-oid" means "similar to". Negroid as a noun was used to designate a wider or more generalized category than Negro; as an adjective, it qualified a noun as in, for example, "negroid features"."
By CAT52! [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 18:08 other posts 
All I’m saying is that depending on the culture, what you think is okay is really offensive
By phart [Ignore] 12,Dec,25 19:32 other posts 
Ok, let's say you witness a heinous crime and the person that did it was obviously a black male wearing pants down around his thighs and a hoodie.

How would You describe this man to the police without offending anyone?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 09:31 other posts 
I would describe him as a Black man who was dressed in a hoodie and wore his pants lowered down to mid derrière. How would you describe him?
By phart [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 12:15 other posts 
But that brings race into the description. A black man. Is it not offensive or racist to mention his skin color? IS it not also offensive to mention how his pants are being worn? Is it not phobic to bring up the hoodie?

I would describe him to a cop similar to what you did trying to be accurate and honest to help catch the crook. But if the crook was brought to trial, the fact that race was mentioned and such may degrade creditability of the witness's to the case as the description would be interpreted as racist and could spell no justice being served because of it.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 14:07 other posts 
No. A description is not racist. If I had said, “He’s a fu..king Nig…r, that would be racist. If it was a white man I would have described him as a white man with what seemed wearing a hoodie and pants that were falling off.
By phart [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 17:48 other posts 
Ok, well, see right there, you said the white mans pants are falling off whereas the black mans pants were lowered to mid ass, I can't spell the other word! my keyboard don't make those letters! but mentioning the pants that way could be considered racist.

I moved this from where i posted it on kembos post,
But If I ever ride on a airplane I am going to sit beside the biggest black lady I can find. Because if it crashes the emergency personal always look for the black box first!
By CAT52! [Ignore] 14,Dec,25 18:20 other posts 
Maybe I should have said the white guy looked like a plumber?🤣🤣


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#91



Show your Genitals