I seen the craziest thing this morning
A flag with a picture of a United States flag on it and an eagle sitting on top of the flag at the bottom was big bold letters saying
FREEDOM
A known Democrat lives there the funny part is
Just what do the Democrats know about freedom they are all about controlling everything and giving everything we own to other countries
Short of blacklisting member(s), is there any possibility that you could implement a feature that prohibits specific member(s) from interacting with "you" or your content? Maybe something like when you choose to delete an unwanted comment, a 48 to 72 hour "time out" that's implemented where they are unable to interact with you, your blog or your forum thread?
I'm not a fan of blacklisting OR changing my settings to accept from "friends only" because that could and would limit possibilities however sometimes there is a need when an obstinate member or two just does't know when "enough is enough".
Today, I kid you not, have deleted approximately 60 posts from my blog sent by the same annoying member. I've asked this member to stop without result.
Well, because the site was developed layer by layer it's not so easy to add something like that without looking over half of it's code. So I would say no. However, I think I made something like that for some aussie (I don't remember his nick already) for being a huge money contributor so I will check it out if it can be retro-fitted to the purposes you desire.
Thank you, I appreciate your consideration. 👍 --------------------------------------- added after 39 minutes
PA-Freddy, PITBULL.......I'm not "crying" to admin, I'm attempting to come to reasonable solution to a problem. Although YOU DO NOT ALLOW random members (non "friends") to
post in your blogs, on your wall or on your pictures, I've allowed your posts in my blog. The problem is that you are continually rude, repetitive and often your posts are nothing more than things you've made up to "stir the pot". I've had enough, I've asked you to stop posting your nasty comments and like a child, you continue to post. At the time that I posted my request to admin, my guess is that you posted 60+ comments in this blog and I've been busy deleting them. /blogs/54571.html
Apparently you think you're entertaining and funny. Sorry to say that I find you quite annoying. 👍
Aspartame, a popular artificial sweetener, will likely to be considered a possible carcinogen by the World Health Organization! Well, after all these years, now they're going to tell us it's going to give us cancer!
only registered users can see external links --------------------------------------- added after 104 minutes
I remember 10 years ago reading an article about how aspartame causes Alzheimer’s like symptoms but I don’t use anything diet related I’m a sugar junkie
I have to say, I still use Equal and Splenda as sugar substitutes. Perhaps I'm too "late" but I'm going but for as infrequently as I use "sugar", I think I'm going to switch back to sugar.
It might add some years to your mind and maybe your life I told my brother about aspartame 10 years ago and he laughed at me he drinks a lot of diet soda and now look at him he’s all screwed up heart problems memory problems he’s in way worse shape than I am and I’m 7 years older than him of course he aloud the medical people use him as a Ginny pig and still has the same problems they just made it that he can never work again
Actually I still have some full picture targets of osamabinladen I used to shoot at they make them for anyone famous including Obama and yes even Joe the mo Biden
Yet having gun targets that are pictures of men/women of Middle Eastern descent is problematic as well. Same could be said if targets were of Asian, Latino or any other group of people.
It’s way deeper than a race thing I bought those targets after the World Trade Center was attacked by alqaeda and we had a president that absolutely would not tolerate an attack of any kind on American soil
Hey, Freddy or PITBULL , I didn't "blacklist" you, you were "bitch slapped". I allowed you to post in my blog, I responded to your 6 or so posts but when your posts became redundant and abusive, I asked you to move along because you were no longer welcome to post there any longer. You are thick headed and continued to post so I reached out to admin and expressed what I would like. Voila! He was able to accommodate my request.
Stop your whinging, you sound like a child and that is so unbecoming. And regarding your blog, quit making stuff up, you're nothing more than a liar.
In the last few days we’ve had posts about the metric system, Amazon, the abuse panel, suicide, fake members, suicide, the Confederacy, hot tamales, food, and crappy members. In my opinion 2Nice is full of it. I’ve noticed he didn’t bring a “suitable” subject to discuss. --------------------------------------- added after 7 minutes
You,Bella, are a moderator for several groups. Perhaps you could invite some of those people to come here and participate. One last thing, when I find something “boring”, I move on. There are oodles of threads dealing with cock sucking, cock length and looks, wife likes to f_ck my brother, etc. there’s only a few that have political chats. There must be millions of pics from oral practice to anal practice. Why the negative review?
The SW coastal waters of Florida has over 1000 islands. Big chunk are in the Everglades National Park. The waters are part of the Gulf of Mexico and the "delta" for the River of Grass, ie The Everglades..
It reads; "hey, guys the new poll of the day; SHOULD MEMBER BE ALLOWED TO COMMENT ON ANY BLOGS?"
When I attempted to post on HIS blog, I received the following message; "Sorry, this member accepts comments from friends only. Contact him/her via private chat and try to become a friend."
So yeah, what makes Freddy's blog so hilarious is he only allows his "friends" to comment on HIS blogs, leave comments on HIS wall and HIS pictures. What has Freddy all revved up is that I have continued to delete HIS comments from MY blog! Is that fucktard that big of a mongoloid? That was a rhetorical question that I can answer.....HELL YEAH!
It baffles the junk out of me why someone who does not allow members, other than his "friends", to post in his blogs won't stay out of mine when when I've asked him to. I allowed him the opportunity to make several posts but enough is enough. I've deleted every post he's made after I told him he was not welcome to post. He's wearing me out....
Other than leopoldij, I only blacklist when the member blacklists me. I feel compassion for him, he really can't help that he's so repulsive and stoopid!
As most of you are aware, admin created the Evaluation Panel for verified members to determine whether their peer members have broken site guidelines and if it warrants their deletion. admin's only "rule" is; "No guidelines. If you do not have any common sense you should not participate here! If you "freeze" deletion of something really important like child porn you are banned from the site no matter what." COMMON SENSE!
Today, a member is referred for Copyright/Stolen and the following "Explanation" is given; "Explanation: This is a fake member keeps remaking a different account /forum/thread.php?id=19962#92 " Yep, copyright/stolen, fake member and the PROOF provided is a link to a Forum thread. The first 4 voters vote ABUSE HAS NO GROUND and the fifth voter votes DELETE THIS MEMBER with the following reason; "why tolerate this behavior?"
I'm all about voters having REASONS to support their vote but I'm wondering what "behavior" has been exhibited that would warrant a deletion? I wonder whether the voter realizes admin has a MEMBERS THAT LIKELY WERE BANNED BEFORE area that did not detect the reported member as previously banned?
It's ok to say it was me that said that. If the person keeps coming back as a fake member ,thats the behavior i was referring to. ,why continue to allow it? if they are fake and not really contributing anything real to the site?
Keeps coming back, but, who said the member is fake? And, if the member is fake, doesn’t the member post pics? Doesn’t the member chat? Doesn’t the member use points? Unless the member claims he’s the late Queen of England and we find out he’s really Joe Biden using his points to buy soiled men’s panties, I don’t see why he should be banned. WTF, we have several accounts by the same people all about sex dolls. We have one member who thinks he’s a Judge of the Supreme Court. You want to ban someone? Ban someone that steals other members pics. Ban someone that brings child p0rno to the site (and call the cops). Ban someone who practices b.e.s.tía lity on site. Not this --------------------------------------- added after 14 minutes
BTW, is buying soiled panties on line grounds for banishment?
Actually, if you/your profile is deleted and you are banned, I kinda get the impression that admin isn't going to "kick and scream" or push "POOF!" if you return unless you're acting like a fool and repeating the behavior that got you banned in the first place.
I went by the "allegations". I felt like if they took the time to report it,they must have already done some checking. I won't vote anymore on the thing so I wont' cause a stir.
I just can't quite wrap my head around why people don't seem to mind fakes taking up space? Photos,text,files, all take up server space that the admin has to pay for and maintain. is it not cost effective to keep the fakes and so forth at bay?
If I were to report something, I would have already made sure there was a real issue.
so that I would not be teeing up the system for no reason.
Don't NOT vote but dig deep and use your good ol' common sense.
Several months ago, a SYC member reported a SYD member because he said some unkind things. Because she is well liked, the voting members voted to delete him. Why did he have to be deleted when she could have just blacklisted him?
Think about the allegations made. Is it possible they are not true? Is there an alternative to deletion? Was "PROOF" submitted? Remember, everyone is NOT honest!
Phart, allegations are not proof. That’s what several members have been telling you a lot. Vote as you see fit and if it causes a stir, so be it. Now, as far as trying to be an Admin #2, let #1 worry about server space. He’s running a business and he’s well aware of what is profitable. Just an aside: If a fake account creates movement in the site, as long as it’s not breaking any laws, he’s good for the site. Remember, many people, for whatever reason, will interact with this account.
"LITTLE STUFF" is not just choosing the "DELETE MEMBER" option just because so-and-so reported them. PROOF needs to be included, engage in due diligence and use common sense.
Be careful about the stolen pictures thing remember you stole some of mine and doctored them up for your little game and I did the same thing to your picture and lix only i still have mine
Only one and Admin did say that as long as we said it wasn't ours, it was ok. I did identify that it was you. The question is, did I use your face or did I use a real pic of you? 🤣🤣
A flag with a picture of a United States flag on it and an eagle sitting on top of the flag at the bottom was big bold letters saying
FREEDOM
A known Democrat lives there the funny part is
Just what do the Democrats know about freedom they are all about controlling everything and giving everything we own to other countries
Short of blacklisting member(s), is there any possibility that you could implement a feature that prohibits specific member(s) from interacting with "you" or your content? Maybe something like when you choose to delete an unwanted comment, a 48 to 72 hour "time out" that's implemented where they are unable to interact with you, your blog or your forum thread?
I'm not a fan of blacklisting OR changing my settings to accept from "friends only" because that could and would limit possibilities however sometimes there is a need when an obstinate member or two just does't know when "enough is enough".
Today, I kid you not, have deleted approximately 60 posts from my blog sent by the same annoying member. I've asked this member to stop without result.
--------------------------------------- added after 39 minutes
PA-Freddy, PITBULL.......I'm not "crying" to admin, I'm attempting to come to reasonable solution to a problem. Although YOU DO NOT ALLOW random members (non "friends") to
post in your blogs, on your wall or on your pictures, I've allowed your posts in my blog. The problem is that you are continually rude, repetitive and often your posts are nothing more than things you've made up to "stir the pot". I've had enough, I've asked you to stop posting your nasty comments and like a child, you continue to post. At the time that I posted my request to admin, my guess is that you posted 60+ comments in this blog and I've been busy deleting them. /blogs/54571.html
Apparently you think you're entertaining and funny. Sorry to say that I find you quite annoying. 👍
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 104 minutes
only registered users can see external links
Stop your whinging, you sound like a child and that is so unbecoming. And regarding your blog, quit making stuff up, you're nothing more than a liar.
/blogs/54639.html
Boring.
--------------------------------------- added after 7 minutes
You,Bella, are a moderator for several groups. Perhaps you could invite some of those people to come here and participate. One last thing, when I find something “boring”, I move on. There are oodles of threads dealing with cock sucking, cock length and looks, wife likes to f_ck my brother, etc. there’s only a few that have political chats. There must be millions of pics from oral practice to anal practice. Why the negative review?
Regards,
2nice is full of it.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
/blogs/54618.html
It reads; "hey, guys the new poll of the day; SHOULD MEMBER BE ALLOWED TO COMMENT ON ANY BLOGS?"
When I attempted to post on HIS blog, I received the following message; "Sorry, this member accepts comments from friends only. Contact him/her via private chat and try to become a friend."
So yeah, what makes Freddy's blog so hilarious is he only allows his "friends" to comment on HIS blogs, leave comments on HIS wall and HIS pictures. What has Freddy all revved up is that I have continued to delete HIS comments from MY blog! Is that fucktard that big of a mongoloid? That was a rhetorical question that I can answer.....HELL YEAH!
only registered users can see external links
● When your sentences are grammatically correct and your words are spelled correctly.
● When you learn to be nice.
● When you allow other members to post in your blogs.
● When HELL FREEZES OVER.
I make that promise to you, whichever comes first.
Freddy is so fricken annoying.
Today, a member is referred for Copyright/Stolen and the following "Explanation" is given; "Explanation: This is a fake member keeps remaking a different account /forum/thread.php?id=19962#92 " Yep, copyright/stolen, fake member and the PROOF provided is a link to a Forum thread. The first 4 voters vote ABUSE HAS NO GROUND and the fifth voter votes DELETE THIS MEMBER with the following reason; "why tolerate this behavior?"
I'm all about voters having REASONS to support their vote but I'm wondering what "behavior" has been exhibited that would warrant a deletion? I wonder whether the voter realizes admin has a MEMBERS THAT LIKELY WERE BANNED BEFORE area that did not detect the reported member as previously banned?
--------------------------------------- added after 14 minutes
BTW, is buying soiled panties on line grounds for banishment?
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
The evaluation panel requires common sense. It also requires PROOF.
I just can't quite wrap my head around why people don't seem to mind fakes taking up space? Photos,text,files, all take up server space that the admin has to pay for and maintain. is it not cost effective to keep the fakes and so forth at bay?
If I were to report something, I would have already made sure there was a real issue.
so that I would not be teeing up the system for no reason.
Several months ago, a SYC member reported a SYD member because he said some unkind things. Because she is well liked, the voting members voted to delete him. Why did he have to be deleted when she could have just blacklisted him?
Think about the allegations made. Is it possible they are not true? Is there an alternative to deletion? Was "PROOF" submitted? Remember, everyone is NOT honest!
--------------------------------------- added after 61 seconds
Want to see
--------------------------------------- added after 25 minutes
Never mind he must’ve taken it down
New Comment Go to top