|
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Cum isn't stored in the balls!!! 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: |
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Great song, great message, great humor.
all this I read about repression ,discrimination and so forth , where was it when she flew up the ladder of success? just goes to show, if you are smart,the doors will open.
Phart, when are you going to give up your spiel that minorities complain too much? It’s funny but typical. You seem like a nice guy but you are a racist.
If you are born white and wealthy, the doors will open further, no matter how stupid
you are.
Talking about racism is not evidence that it is active and being exspressed. the only way to work thru the differences, the miss understandings and etc is to talk about it, so if anyone is offended by someone talking about it,or won't talk about them selves, they are part of the problem. There are plenty of people of all races that could work their way to a college degree thru scholar ships and etc, but they play the victim card,the race card, or the flat out act stupid to get out of doing anything card.
You just admitted that it was affordable. It isn't anymore.
That hurts poor people to help their children grow out of poverty.
Since the income inequality is worse for black people, that affects black people more than white people. And then you will accuse them of not trying hard enough. Do you want them to make something of themselves or not? If so, why make it even harder?
Do you prefer spending money on prisons in stead of on schools?
Liberals and leftists aren't offended by someone talking about racism.
They might be offended by someone expressing racist views though.
You try to pretend that racism isn't true, while your Supreme court just allowed Republicans to gerrymander the shit out of elections, to make the votes of black people completely irrelevant. That's racism, systemic racism.
only registered users can see external links
How do I define Christian morality? Following the teachings of Jesus himself.
Let's score Jesus, Trump and Mamdani on the virtues that Jesus professed:
Humility
Jesus: 95%
Trump: 15%
Zohran Mamdani: 65%
Care for the poor
Jesus: 98%
Trump: 35%
Zohran Mamdani: 90%
Compassion
Jesus: 95%
Trump: 30%
Zohran Mamdani: 85%
Mercy and forgiveness
Jesus: 98%
Trump: 20%
Zohran Mamdani: 75%
Service to others
Jesus: 97%
Trump: 35%
Zohran Mamdani: 85%
Inclusion of outsiders
Jesus: 95%
Trump: 25%
Zohran Mamdani: 90%
Skepticism toward wealth and status
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 5%
Zohran Mamdani: 85%
Avoidance of self-glorification
Jesus: 90%
Trump: 10%
Zohran Mamdani: 70%
Peacemaking
Jesus: 90%
Trump: 45%
Zohran Mamdani: 75%
Love of enemies
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 10%
Zohran Mamdani: 65%
Self-sacrifice
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 20%
Zohran Mamdani: 70%
Strict sexual morality
Jesus: 95%
Trump: 20%
Zohran Mamdani: 40%
Religious devotion
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 35%
Zohran Mamdani: 70%
Obedience to God
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 25%
Zohran Mamdani: 65%
Evangelism / spreading a religious message
Jesus: 98%
Trump: 20%
Zohran Mamdani: 30%
Traditional family and marital commitment
Jesus: 60%
Trump: 35%
Zohran Mamdani: 80%
Raw average score:
Jesus: ~90%
Trump: ~25%
Zohran Mamdani: ~73%
Similarity to Jesus:
Jesus → Jesus: 100%
Zohran Mamdani → Jesus: ~80%
Trump → Jesus: ~27%
You call yourself a Christian, don't you?
The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is a Christian organization.
Do they have the SAME belief as YOU?
First of all, we call the religion of the 9/11 terrorist "Jihadist" for a reason, it's because
they hold convictions that are different from what Muslims believe.
In fact, most Muslims find them both repulsive and blaspheme.
Everyday Muslims use the following terms for extremists:
Kharijites (Khawarij) — "The Outcasts"
It is a severe theological judgment meaning: "You have departed from the true path of Islam and are repeating an ancient, corrupted error."
Ghuluw — "Extremism/Exaggeration"
The Prophet Muhammad explicitly warned his followers against ghuluw (religious extremism or overstepping the bounds). In Islamic jurisprudence, practicing ghuluw is considered a major sin because it distorts God’s message
Fasad fil-Ard — "Corruption on the Earth"
The Quran heavily condemns creating fasad (moral corruption, chaos, or ruin) on Earth. Mainstream Muslims view terrorist acts—such as bombings, destruction of property, and killing innocents—not as holy war, but as fasad. Under Islamic law, committing fasad is an egregious crime against society and God.
Do you hear Christians using terms from the Bible to condemn extremists?
If there aren't even Christian terms for that, that makes you MORE the same.
Phart is literally justifying everything that the Christian nationalist are doing.
These people are pushing their religion onto everyone; pushing THEOCRACY.
In fact, it's the closest real thing to the fear of SHARIA getting pushed on you.
It's going on right now, 24/7, while you are focusing on the Muslim scare.
What is Sharia?
- Religious law over above secular law
- Fusion of religion and state
- Women having no rights other than serving men
- Getting banned if your religion doesn't agree with theirs
- Women being forced to cover themselves up
- Complete sexual repression
- Violence towards LGTBQ
- Horrible punishment for crimes
- Censorship of culture and education
- Claims that the nation has a special divine mission (God's plan)
- Preference for strong leaders who claim to defend religious values
- Prioritizing religious community norms above personal freedom
This is EXACTLY what is pushed by Trump's cronies now. ALL OF IT!
Pete Hegseth is openly pushing Sharia-like ideas and a HOLY WAR.
I don't see you denouncing that or calling it blasphemy.
You must have the same belief!
Has Zohran Mamdami said or done anything to make you think that he is letting
extremist Jihadist or even standard Muslim ideology guide his actions?
Damn, these propagandists play you like a fiddle. Take back your brain!
It's laws that are introducing religious doctrine into law and restricting personal freedoms. That is exactly what your Christian Nationalists are asking for,
and Trump is letting them have lots of it, completely violating the Constitution.
These are the categories of law that both define Sharia Law and the goals of Christian Nationalists:
1. Restrictions on Female Freedom and Autonomy
2. Harsh, Religious Morality-Based Punishments
3. Restrictions on Criticizing Religion
4. Eradication of Sexual Freedoms and Bodily Autonomy
5. Criminalization and Erasure of LGBTQ+ Identities
6. Religious Control over Public Education and Science
7. Legal Privileging of the Dominant Faith (Religious Caste System)
8. Totalitarian Infiltration of the Civil Bureaucracy
Things that the Trump administration already did:
- Abortion restrictions: Trump appointed Supreme Court justices who were part of the majority in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned the constitutional right to abortion established by Roe v. Wade. Critics argue this reflects conservative Christian moral views influencing law.
- Religious exemptions and conscience protections: His administration expanded protections for religious organizations and individuals who objected to certain requirements (for example, contraception coverage or participation in same-sex weddings). Supporters viewed this as protecting religious freedom; critics viewed it as allowing religious beliefs to limit others' rights.
- LGBTQ-related policies: Critics cited policies such as restrictions on transgender military service and some education-related positions as reflecting traditional religious views on gender and sexuality.
- School prayer and religion in public life: Trump frequently advocated a larger role for religion in public institutions and criticized what he saw as hostility toward Christianity in public life.
- Support for displaying religious symbols and expanding faith-based initiatives: His administration generally favored broader accommodation of religious expression in government-connected settings.
You challenged me to give just one example, I'm giving you the complete picture.
This is what is happening:
- government enforcement of religious morality,
- privileging one religion,
- linking religious identity with citizenship and patriotism,
- suppressing criticism of dominant religious views,
- and concentrating power in leaders who claim to represent the nation's true religious values.
That's the actions that a government will take to change a democracy to a theocracy.
You seem to take your sexual freedom seriously, but you are defending a government that WILL call your freedom 'perverse' and punish you for it.
You bastards are so desperate to control the lives of other people, you create scenarios in your heads and then project them onto the real world. Your type will never be happy until you have the rest of us crawling on all fours while you lash our backs with whips.
Are you even listening to your president and his people when they speak?
The first thing they do is make you register yourself when you want to watch or share material of a sexual nature. Simultaneously, they are setting up a mass surveillance system, to record everything that you're doing.
Tell me that you don't see that happening...
Where do you see 'my type' doing that?
STOP! YOU’RE KILLING ME!
Holy fucking shit! What the fuck do you know? Who is they and why would they care? I can go to numerous sites and never have to log in or register to watch a damned thing!
Oh, my fucking god! You’re creating more scenarios in your little head to justify your insane ideology!
Get help. I’m sure there is some American taxpayer-subsidized psychological help available to you nearby in your tiny little underwater country! Hop on your bicycle and go get treatment!
If you had real arguments, you would use them.
"my insane ideology"?
Explain what you think that I want and why you think that's insane.
I don't want a small group of people dominating me. Is that insane?
'They' are the ridiculously conservative people who call themselves Christian and want to push their doctrine onto all Americans. They are only a small group in your country, but they have LOTS OF MONEY, and they are USING IT to buy politicians. You are most likely not part of that group, but you are allowing them to do it, by looking away. You better open your eyes, before it's too late.
Trump is openly proposing to make 'Anti-Christian' actions 'terrorism'.
Explain that please.
Republicans have repeatedly pushed federal legislation that would require age verification for adult-content websites nationwide. Recent examples include the 'SCREEN Act' and the 'SAFE for Kids Act', both of which would require websites hosting significant amounts of sexually explicit content to verify users' ages before granting access.
They will eventually pass a law that make you verify your age, by registration. Only liberals, leftists and principled privacy respecting Republicans are voting against it.
MAGA politicians don't have principles. They just do as they are told, or they get expelled. Marjorie Taylor Greene actually believes in protecting young women from the abuse of dirty powerful wealthy men, and you saw what became of her.
Meanwhile, Palantir has received substantial federal contracts under the Trump administration, including defense, intelligence, health, and civilian-agency work. Public contract records show ongoing awards, and reporting indicates federal spending on Palantir increased significantly in 2025–2026.
In 2025, reporting indicated that a Trump executive order promoting data sharing across federal agencies was being implemented using Palantir's Foundry platform in some agencies. This could make it easier to combine data that had historically been kept in separate government silos.
Civil-liberties groups, watchdog organizations, and some lawmakers have expressed concern that:
- Multiple agencies may be able to access and analyze larger pools of personal data.
- Data from different federal systems could be linked together more easily.
- The public has limited visibility into how the systems are used and what safeguards exist.
You don't even need some big evil agency to record every move you are making, because all the social media are already doing that, under the argument of making money from advertising.
“ The U.S. provides billions of dollars in foreign aid to Europe, overwhelmingly focused on security, economic, and humanitarian support for Ukraine. Historically, total U.S. foreign assistance accounts for less than 1%, or roughly 0.2 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) annually.Top Aid Recipients in Europe:Ukraine: By far the largest recipient, receiving tens of billions in U.S. support since 2022 across military, financial, and humanitarian sectors. Trackers, such as data from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, show the U.S. committed over EUR $65 billion in military aid.Other European Nations: The U.S. routinely provides modest foreign assistance packages to other strategic European and Eurasian countries, typically totaling tens of millions to bolster democratic institutions, energy security, and border enforcement.Context and Comparison:While the U.S. is the largest single-country donor in the world, European nations and the European Union have collectively contributed more total aid to Ukraine than the U.S.. You can review detailed, country-by-country breakdowns on the official ForeignAssistance.gov Dashboard or explore broader international humanitarian priorities on USAID.”
How is it an argument to all Muslims being a danger or not???
Lookatmine2 didn't have a counter argument to what I said about Muslims
and Christian Nationalists, so he attacks with irrelevant nonsense.
My argument is that the US is much closer to becoming a theocracy, by the actions
of Christian Nationalists, than by the actions of Muslims, with very similar repression
of freedoms, and I see no one making an argument against it.
My political ideas or my country's finances are irrelevant to that argument.
If a Christian hears someone talking about bombing a building, he is going to go tell the law or do something to try to prevent this from happening. you know other muslims hear rumors or something about attacks being planned, why not prevent them? And why don't these muslims PUBLICLY denounce the violence? Um, could be because they don't disagree.
"How often do Muslim people in the U.S. report suspicions of terrorism or extremism?" Neither the FBI nor major academic studies appear to publish a comprehensive count
of such reports.
What researchers have found is that Muslim-American communities have frequently cooperated with law enforcement and have sometimes played a significant role in identifying or disrupting extremist activity:
A major study by researchers at the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security found that Muslim-American organizations and community leaders have engaged in "self-policing" practices, including reporting concerns about potentially radicalized individuals to law enforcement, excluding extremist preachers from mosques, and confronting people expressing support for terrorism.
Researchers and law-enforcement experts have argued that cooperation from Muslim communities has been important in preventing attacks and identifying suspects.
The same body of research notes that violent extremism involving Muslim Americans has historically involved a very small number of individuals relative to the size of the Muslim-American population. For example, one annual report identified 25 Muslim-Americans associated with terrorism cases in 2014, with only 6 involved in plotting or engaging in violence in the U.S. that year.
The difficulty is that most tips to law enforcement are not publicly categorized by the religion of the person making the report. So we can say:
Muslim Americans do report concerns about extremism and suspicious behavior.
Researchers have documented this cooperation as a meaningful factor in counterterrorism efforts.
There is no authoritative nationwide figure showing what percentage of all terrorism tips come from Muslims or how often the average Muslim-American makes such reports.
only registered users can see external links
for every person who you consider different.
We came back from a week of vacation in Germany, at around 19:00 hrs.
Our Muslim neighbors brought as food, as soon as we came home,
saving us the trouble of arranging something to eat ourselves.
has blocked an American company taking over a Dutch data company.
Here is an American investigating it and being shocked about the implications.
only registered users can see external links
(He's not a very political person)
What this jerk on the YouTube post is spewing out is pure and simple ignorance and stupidity with a slice of racism. This man was ELECTED to serve in 11/2024 along with the Clown. He’s been in office 18 months, and, in all this time, he has served with correctness. No one can say the Clown has.
So, my question is, “Is this man plotting to take down the Empire State Building or perhaps the Chrysler Building?” Another question, “Is he planning to shoot up Times Square during a Wednesday lunch hour?”
I can understand your dislike for his politics, but, his religion? I don’t like the Clowns politics or policies but I won’t put him down for being a Christian (sic).
I think it's blasphemy. Zohran Mamdami makes a better Christian than Trump.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 hours
Zohran Mamdami even looks much more like what Jesus probably looked like.
The image of the white, blonde, blue-eyed hippie, is just a fantasy from white people.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 hours
If Jesus returned to the US right now, he would be deported by ICE in a hot minute.
only registered users can see external links
Believe me, I’m NOT complaining!!!
Generally, in the morning, I’m up and out between 06:00 and 06:15 for my walk BECAUSE BY 08:00, the sun is up and out and it’s mid 70’s to 80 degrees. Too hot to walk!
Life is good in the high desert.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
it is a video of a dumbass cop trying to say the lady was holding her cell phone in her right hand. And she doesn't have 1.
at the last minute he trys to get the ticket tossed out that HE wrote. I would hope he had to stand before a judge under oath and explain himself.
Can’t have an ego as a cop. It gets in the way of your job performance, and it can get you into trouble.
I didn't click on your link, I just imagined a guy steering with his dick.
I don't care much about anecdotes of stupid people doing stupid shit.
It's the whole world right now. Why would I care about one more?
I didn't expect a video from you showing a cop being an asshole
and refusing to admit a mistake. That's a pattern, not an anecdote.
There are countless stories and videos of that.
Better think about how and why this is happening.
The chance that he has to stand before a judge under oath and explain himself
is very slim. That's the system that your side of politics has created.
What do you expect if you take accountability away from people with power?
The solution isn't even to make them fear accountability again or more,
it is to teach them again what their purpose is; "To serve and protect" the public.
only registered users can see external links
Why do you think it's one or the other?
People can communicate opinions in a funny way.
Whether it is his opinion or just jokes, the result is the same.
Some of his jokes contain actual philosophical arguments, refuting religion.
Which doesn't take a lot, because the philosophical arguments that support religion
have been destroyed a million times over.
There are only 2 arguments for religion that actually make any sense:
- Some people are unable to be decent people, without the threat of hell.
- It's possible that a consciousness started the universe.
If the existing religions were actually any good, those would be decent arguments
to join one. The problem is that they all expect people to believe nonsense.
New Comment Go to top