Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#801
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
If you leave them in the plastic package that they came in and put them in the freezer they freeze well. They will last a few weeks like that.
only registered users can see external links
Because comedy is legal now.
Republicans are just way more evil and ridiculous.
Humor is a tool to defend democracy. Republicans are attacking it.
That's because it's made by 'left' or liberal channels.
Why should they create "equal laughing at both sides". Your side wouldn't.
Also, a right-wing version doesn't work. They fail to be funny.
That's mostly because the left punches up and the right punches down.
That turns cringe very easily.
Right-wing media has tried at least 7 attempts to replicate The Daily Show with
a right-wing voice. They have spent lots of money trying. It's just often a loss,
because people don't watch it and advertisers don't want to advertise on it.
- The 1/2 Hour News Hour
- NewsBusted
- The Flip Side
- Gutfeld!
- Tyrus and Timpf (segments)
- The Babylon Bee
- Louder with Crowder
- JP Sears / AwakenWithJP
- PragerU Shorts / Satirical Videos
Gutfeld! is a notable exception, a Fox News late-night show hosted by Greg Gutfeld.
It leans conservative, mixes humor and commentary, and performs well in ratings.
But its humor is often blunt, more like political snark than layered satire.
It lacks the viral sketch/monologue appeal that drives Daily Show clips online.
You even acknowledge that you don't think it's funny. That's not because they are not funny, but because right-wingers don't like that type of humor.
Left-Leaning Audiences: Seek irony, ambiguity, character-driven mockery.
Right-Leaning Audiences: Prefer clarity, affirmation, punditry.
There's character differences between right-wingers and left-wingers.
Honestly, I think right-wingers are just not smart enough for satire.
Not necessarily, and not in this case.
First of all, this was a shakedown. Even if CBS cut the 60 Minutes interview, Fox'News' heavily edited Trump interviews, in multiple instances.
Trump didn't have any chance of winning this case, he was just interested in pumping up the legal costs for CBS. They only settled, because continuing would have costed more. It's mostly a giving him a win, to get Trump off their backs.
There was no admission of guilt, Paramount did not apologize or admit wrongdoing,
but committed to releasing transcripts of future “60 Minutes” interviews with presidential candidates. That's a dereliction of duty to their first amendment right.
In any case, this settlement didn't contain a gag order of any kind.
Look it up! It's just Trump cracking down against free speech.
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
A strong stock market, often characterized by rising stock prices and increased investor confidence, generally indicates economic growth, positive corporate performance, and increased consumer spending. It reflects optimism about the future direction of the economy and is a leading indicator of potential economic expansion.
People voted for Trump, because they cannot afford GROCERIES!
If you say 'My 401K', you're gonna need it, when Social Security is destroyed.
"potential economic expansion" Sure, if you had the people for those jobs. You have an incredible labor shortage. And Trump is kidnapping all those hard workers and putting them in a concentration camp. But, what is that "economic expansion" good for?
The US already had one of the highest GDPs in the world. You have lots of billionaires, but the people cannot afford food, rent, education and a decent life. If you managed to double the GDP, would you THEN have money for the average American and to reduce homelessness? Or will you just have a lot of trillionaires?
That stock crash is coming, don't you worry. Trump's handouts for the wealthy make them happy in the short-term, but your collapse of the middle class, rapidly increasing debt, your destruction of education and the rest of the world turning their backs on the US, will be the end of your economic dominance in the world. You rely too much on it. When it falls away, that's the end of your empire. China will take over. I was afraid of that before, but your turn to fascism makes me prefer them over you.
Between 1980 and 2020, China lifted over 800 million of their people out of poverty. What has the US done for its poorest people? Created more of them?
"the Dems don’t know what to do"
I totally agree with that. If people still +1 prefer Trump over them, that's complete
and utter incompetence. The Democratic party needs a complete overhaul.
but Trump has fully created every dip in the stocks, since he was inaugurated.
Since Trump’s second inauguration in January 2025, the U.S. dollar has depreciated by approximately 10–11%, marking its worst start to a year in over 50 years.
The annual GDP growth is range from 1.4–1.7%, compared to 2.8% in 2024, highlighting a notable slowdown.
If you want to benefit from stocks, you have to buy and sell. Some stocks have good dividend, which is better than interest on a savings account, but owning individual stocks is also much more risky than a savings account. Dividend is only worth the risk, if you diversify or maybe better buy one or more dividend ETFs.
In any case, you might have some money, giving you some returns, but most Americans don't. The fact that it's the benefit that helps you the most, is exactly my point. You should have much more than that, in a country with one of the highest GDPs in the world.
In any case, that's very coincidental for you, but it's no trend that proves anything.
When Trump breaks your economy, they will all drop. What he's doing is not sustainable. (Not 'sustainable' environmentally, but economically)
Your economy cannot survive, when the middle class declines further.
When the rest of the world abandons you, it will all come crumbling down.
First your tariffs were intended to bring back manufacturing, but when that didn't work, the story switched to "it's a negotiation tactic". Is that working already? Meanwhile, you are paying for more expensive products and the US cannot sell theirs. Even if you did manage to make more in America, who is going to buy it? We won't and you can't, because you're getting poorer by the day.
"Since January 2025, inflation in the U.S. has risen modestly, reversing earlier improvements from late 2024. Cost pressures are intensifying due to tariffs,
food prices, and a stickier core inflation trend."
no.
make every single car hundreds of dollars more expensive.
There is also a thing as retaliatory tariffs...
Harley Davidson revenue is down 23% and their motorcycle shipments are down roughly 33%, do to the EU's 50% tariff. It also prompted Harley‑Davidson to move production of EU‑bound bikes to Thailand.
I couldn't believe non-Americans still drove those lawnmowers, but apparently.
Jon Stewart Reacts to Colbert's Cancellation & Trump's "Bawdy" Epstein Doodles
only registered users can see external links
He's doing better journalism than any news channel, while being funny.
how many of these do you do>?
i know for sure that number 1,2, 4, 8 are common place for me. if i became a millionaire tommorow, i would not change alot of my habits. no need to waste money. i never buy new clothes except socks and underware, never buy new vehicles, machines, if i can build ,repair ,or buy second hand.cheaper.
i do still own my first car to.
people that struggle in life money wise that work, may have their standards set a bit to high.
i know a fellow, makes 29 dollars a hour, gets per deem for travel, and still can't make his bills. i scratch my head as i watch him put worn out used tires on his jeep to get to work, poor as i am i can at least buy a safe tire.
only registered users can see external links
but i like this 1 better. some women whine and act so defenseless, watch this.
only registered users can see external links
Do you really not understand the difference between the 2 videos?
By your own moral standards, Trump should have been executed decades ago.
He stole a lot more than a few pencils, from lots of people.
I even support the message: "Hey man, stealing is a risky business.
Maybe stop doing it, before you meet someone crazier than me."
only registered users can see external links
I think I can last 10 minutes of that too, but I wouldn't be smiling like them.
It would be good for me, if they invented a sport that I didn't hate and could afford.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
For a 6 year old to want to do that,must have been something bad.Perhaps sexual abuse or something?
SO yea,I know the frustration all to well of how it feels to grow up as "that kid" at the back of the room.
School bullying has been a issue for decades and if these folks that claim to want to make positive changes really meant it,they would do something about it.
Cyber school, It worked for the plandemic,why not keep on?
MUCH cheaper in the long run as the homeless issue could be partly solved by housing people in the old school buildings,busing would no logner be needed. School lunches,would be the PARENTS problem,not the taxpayers and etc. A win win for everyone.
Less school shootings and at the very least,less kids in 1 place to get harmed.
But no, just delete the gun and the whole world will be perfect and kumbaya will be the world anthem.
• Children needn't be bullied by children, teachers or parents.
• Teachers needn't be bullied by the children they're attempting to teach.
• Parents need to be more involved in parenting their children because it's NOT THE JOB OF THE TEACHER to babysit your li'l hooligans 8 hours a day while you're getting high.
Then something like this happens and everyone is like,"HOw could this happen"?
Well, gee,just as being discussed in another thread I mentioned i would like to see the country go back to the ways of the 50's and this is 1 of the reasons why. School shootings were rare.Parents,namely the mother,were involved in the teaching,raising and caring for the children.
Guns were less common and people didn't use agun to settle an argument.
You get to a point in your life sometimes where you are fed up and can NOT take it anymore. In the case of a 6 year old wanting KILL or harm with a gun, I would say exposure to video games and the killing on them may have been a negative influence.
People for decades have tried to explain that violent music, violent tv shows and games, have a negative effect on the people. Prompting violent behaviors and habits. But the liberals call it freedom of expression and whine to their lawyers, as our kids continue to play games and watch violent movies and listen to music that encourages violence without accountability.
The causes of the immense gun violence in aThe US has been debated and argued over for years and there will never be a agreement on how to deal with it.
You have your views on gun control, which I respect but totally disagree with, and. Ihave mine, which you totally disagree with. So the shootings and often killings just keep going on.
My guess is that a 6 year old child is not able to process what he did. He is not able to process what happens when you shoot someone or something with a real gun, that they are not able to get up, dust themselves off because they have a spare life or two. Regardless of how anyone feels about guns and gun violence in the United States, it circles back to current culture. Is it only that the mindset of Americans is fucked up and that we have access to guns? I kinda think that our society/the world is fucked up and folks living elsewhere need to be "creative" with the way they "accomplish" their dastardly deed.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
I mean if you are sending your teen age boy to school would you feel comfortable knowing he has a gay teacher I wouldn’t
I own my wrecker and the shop and all the tools so I don’t see any one trying to stop me the costumer can either ride with me and trust i will behave or walk it’s that simple
The problem is that the parent(s) did secure the gun properly.
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 3 hours
My bad, an incomplete thought, a better composed thought and sentence would have been as follows;
The problem is not about US gun problem, the problem is that the parent(s) did NOT secure the gun properly.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
And yet a conversation like this when I’m watching the movie four brothers filmed in the mean streets of Detroit
If we could get the guns away from the crooks the rest of us could keep ours locked up until we wanted to target shoot or something.
IF criminals were deterred or dealt with, we wouldn't feel the need to have a gun on our side so to speak.
New Comment Go to top