Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#790
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
I hope this time they elect a younger Pope
that will be around for a while. I've seen a lot
of Popes in my life.
--------------------------------------- added after 7 minutes
Well I guess it's not as many as I thought it was.
only registered users can see external links
I think that's as young as you can expect popes to be.
It's not advantageous to the church to elect younger ones.
They get so much attention any time one dies and a new one is elected.
The new pope is already causing MAGA outrage. They don't like him much. lol
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Any honest pope wouldn't like MAGA, because they are anti-Jesus.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Here is a great story about why that happens...
only registered users can see external links.
Do you know the story about Nova Scotia sending a Christmas tree
to Boston every year?
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
blames children when Israel starves them to death, blames Ukraine when Russia wants
to conquer them, and blames the whole world for their own economic choices leading to poverty of the working class,... that culture ends up with people who ONLY care about themselves, and justify every action they take as a reaction to what someone else does.
I am 100% sure that the car driver thought they were being harassed for no reason,
and that they acted out of 'self defense'.
That's the result of people being taught to never look inwards, but only outwards.
You're just a neutral observer now, but many people would pick the car driver's side,
if the 'news' added any information that made them dislike the motorbike driver.
Maybe you would be able to “justify” using your fists to assault a woman because she did something to anger you? After all, women are seen in a different light than men, right? I don’t how anyone driving a minivan felt justified in ramming into a motorcycle/motorcyclist (unless the motorcyclist was brandishing a gun and the driver of the minivan felt that was his only option).
only registered users can see external links
When I was in Florida, I was returning from Cape Coral and making a left turn from whatever road I was on and onto SR80. I went wide rather than tight not knowing that 2 lanes were allowed to make the left turn. Did I almost cause an accident? Yes. Was it intentional? No. Did it cause the guy that I accidentally cut off to swerve to avoid a collision? Yes. Did he handle the almost accident well? I don’t think so because when I hit my brakes I allowed him the opportunity to “recover” and get in front of me. Yeah, he used that opportunity to reduce his speed to “force” me to choose to go around him so he could cut me off OR in his choice, he just went super slow and from time to time, slammed on his brakes to show me how pissed he was…… NO, I believe people are fucked up, probably even in the Netherlands, too!
as i had heard there was slight differences but couldn't remember the details.
Is there a difference in water whether it’s brought to a boil on the stovetop OR if it’s “nuked” in the microwave?
Boiling water on a stovetop or heating it in a microwave results in no significant chemical difference in the water itself, assuming both methods reach the same temperature (typically 100°C at sea level for boiling). Water is H₂O, and neither method alters its molecular structure. However, there are a few practical differences:
Impurities and Contaminants: Stovetop boiling often involves a longer, sustained heat that can kill bacteria or reduce certain volatile impurities more effectively. Microwaving water to a boil (or near it) might not maintain the heat long enough to achieve the same sterilization, especially if the water doesn't fully boil.
Superheating in Microwaves: Microwaves can sometimes superheat water (heat it above 100°C without boiling) due to uneven heating and lack of nucleation sites. This can cause sudden, explosive boiling when disturbed, which doesn't typically happen on a stovetop.
Dissolved Gases: Stovetop boiling tends to drive off more dissolved gases (like oxygen or chlorine) due to prolonged agitation and heat. Microwaved water might retain more of these gases if it’s heated quickly without sustained boiling.
Container Effects: Microwave heating can cause trace leaching from certain containers (e.g., plastics not rated as microwave-safe), potentially introducing contaminants. Stovetop boiling in a metal or glass pot is less likely to have this issue.
Taste and Perception: Some people report a difference in taste, likely due to the retention of dissolved gases or incomplete boiling in microwaves, but this is subjective and not a chemical change in the water itself.
If you're just heating water for drinking or cooking and both methods reach a similar temperature, the differences are minimal for most practical purposes. For sterilization or specific culinary uses, stovetop boiling is generally more reliable. Always use microwave-safe containers to avoid unintended contamination.
if you aint learning, you are toes up in a box
only registered users can see external links
You have to get past the nurse's desk first and you're not going anywhere without their OK.
--------------------------------------- added after 99 seconds
… and since I have never spent a night in the hospital since I was born, I have never had anyone visit me in the hospital (knocking on wood).
facial ID sticker has been going on at hospitals here in South Florida for 30 years. CAT can probably confirm, we've had security at main lobbies of hospitals forever. Now, forget about the maternity ward, you have to give blood to get in there.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I know you don't care, because he was black, but things like this happen
to white people too. only registered users can see external links
Do you think she was doing anything wrong?
No reason to be afraid, right?
Police Shooting Kills Unarmed Deaf Man
only registered users can see external links
Deaf Man Dies After Being Shot By Police Multiple Times
only registered users can see external links
Cops Tased and Arrested Deaf Driver for Not Following Orders
only registered users can see external links
Former metro officer weighs in on deadly shooting of deaf, nonverbal man
only registered users can see external links
Not just people either: Old, Blind, Deaf Dog Shot Dead by Cop Thinking It Was Rabid
only registered users can see external links
This is happening so often in your country, that deaf people are now communicating ways to each other to not get killed by police, as a result of being deaf.
"After Deaf Man Is Killed By Cop, Here's How Hearing Impaired Drivers Can Be Safe"
only registered users can see external links
Don't you understand how fucked up that is?
Cops should shoot for only one reason; if they don't, someone else will die in the next second. That's it! No bullshit like "He looked like a threat!" or "He didn't follow orders!". If one cannot do their job of serving and protecting, go find another job, in an office somewhere, like I do. Or be a waiter, or a mechanic, or a dentist.
Only be a cop if you respect people's lives and honor the badge that people allow
you to wear. And you should respect yourself, by demanding respect FROM police,
not FOR police.
to grovel to a cop at second notice, or it's their fault when a cop arrests them,
beats them up or kills them. That's not normal, phart! That's not freedom!
That's not a system that you should defend.
That's not a world that you should want to live in.
Anyone else agree with phart still, or is this making sense to you, at all?
Didn't you once call America "the land of the free"? Is this freedom to you?
Create a country where cops have a REASON to be afraid,
and you'll have a reason to be afraid of those cops.
Then there are lots of cops that act out on people who do exactly as they are told. These cops are clearly not qualified to be a cop, but they get transferred from precinct to precinct, instead of getting fired permanently. That's because you keep supporting politics that let the cops worry only about themselves and not about you. Why do you keep supporting policies that screw you?
What did the Democrats do, to make them fear little white girls?
Our cops are trained to de-escalate. That is safer for everyone involved.
It does help that our cops don't have to assume that everyone has a gun.
It's not very very few, it's lots and lots of times. The problem with right-wing Americans is that it has to happen to YOU or someone you love, before you
see the problem. As long as problems hasn't affected you personally,
you're unable to accept reality.
YouTube is full of actual cases of people who were just minding their own business getting a cop in their face for nothing. They get shouted at in a way like "Don't enter that house!" or "Don't touch that car!". If they then say "But that's my house!" or "But, that's my car!", that is "Resisting arrest" according to the cop, for which he arrests them and put them in front of a judge, demanding 6 months in jail. There's a legal channel showing all those cases, for people who didn't do anything wrong, but were confronted with a cop in an completely over-excited state. That can happen to anyone. If you just live in the same neighborhood as a criminal, or he's looking for someone of your color, size and age, or he's looking for a car that has the same color as your car, he assumes you are the perp he's looking for on the weakest of evidence. That's super dangerous to your health. You better freeze and do exactly as he says, because one move can be your last.
And how do you know how they interact with other people?
They of course interact with you differently, because they know you.
Would they tell you, if they put granny in the hospital for "resisting arrest"?
Being a cop is certainly not a safe job, but their risk is far less than lots of other jobs, while they're causing much higher risks to other people in their jobs.
Cops are not even in the Top 10 of most dangerous jobs.
only registered users can see external links
There are 49.6 million teacher interactions every day in the United States.
There are almost as many teachers killed on the job as cops. Is that an argument?
Do you allow teachers to shoot students, for not following their orders?
Do you ever hear about the good related to teachers? I guess not lately, in the US.
Do you want a doctor, who was fired from several hospitals for killing patients by gross neglect of their responsibility, operating on you? That's the system that you willingly allow for cops. The bad ones get protected. You deserve better, so demand better!
You: "I didn't hear the cop, because I wore headphones!"
Phart: "Well, that's your own fault for wearing headphones outside!"
Now you're going to jail for six months for disobeying an officer.
Or, you ask Saint Peter at the Pearly gates: "Why am I here? What killed me?"
Saint Peter: "A cop shot you, because you didn't hear his order!"
Is that a world you want to live in?
because you are a dumbass that didn't listen to law enforcement.
because you traveled in the wrong circle of friends and got yourself shot.
because you swam over some water and got in the country illegally and committed crimes against our citizens.
because you think you are owed something because of something that happened 140+ years ago and think you don't have to answer to anyone.
because you were somewhere you flat out didn't belong like on a elderly persons private property.
just some examples.
I don't know what you're on about now, but none of it makes sense.
We just don't allow them to be judge, jury and executioner.
What are you trying to point out with your Texas example?
That's your cops failing to do their work, due to a society problem.
It's a society problem that YOU have and we DON'T.
We don't allow people to own military weapons, to make our cops fail at their job.
I just told you how many other jobs are MORE dangerous.
You're not adding anything to your original point to make it stronger,
you're just repeating your original point, which I have already rejected.
What's the difference between a "work accident" and a cop getting killed?
The end result is DEATH. In both cases the "employer" didn't intend it.
Risk = Frequency X Consequence
Other jobs result in a higher frequency of the consequence death
Other jobs ALSO result in a higher frequency of other consequences,
like serious injuries or disability.
Cops having a dangerous job is no reason to increase danger to innocent citizens.
but no, we have theives and murderers wandering the streets because your kind of people are more concerned about their rights than you are of the law abiding citizens. once you set a precedent of not punishing the crooked, they get bolder and that is when they start disrespecting and shooting cops. prompting cops to defend themselves.
my point about the texas case is those cops were more concerned about their own safety than the safety of the defenseless children and teachers. they were also more concerned about procedure than the safety of the kids or teachers because cops are so over regulated and are punished every time they try to enforce the law. rodney king would still be alive today had he not been driving drunk and disobeying the cops.
We have criminals too, but our police doesn't harm or kill innocent citizens.
How many times should I tell you that the police should protect and serve
the citizens, instead of prioritizing THEIR lives over the lives of citizens?
That's exactly what happened in Texas, which proves MY point, not yours.
you have to wonder why the cops prioritize their lives,it is not their lives, it is the high risk of punishment for actually doing their job they are trying to prevent in some cases, and in some cases, they are wimps and made a bad career choice. kinda like fellows that join the army for the free college education then find themselves in the desert fighting a war. duh
Again, you are making my point; I told you that bad cops should lose their jobs. That means overaggressive cops and that means cowardly cops.
Serve and protect or find another job. Why do you keep disagreeing?
These photos have been peacefully displayed in mattsjohnson18's gallery for quite some time as member uploaded one of those photos on October, 2015 and the other photo in October, 2014. Can you believe it? Those pictures have been proudly displayed for 7 and 8 years but leo is desperate for points!
02,Jun,22 08:35 mattsjohnson18: I don't know where this is coming from. I don't have any pics on my wall that I didn't take myself in Asheville. I don't even know where to look for this abuse report to reject it or see their "proof". The pics of my friend have been on my wall for years.
02,Jun,22 08:45 bella!: I showed you a screen shot of the report made and I recognize that those pictures have been displayed for 7 to 8 years but the fact remains, you were reported for deletion by another member because he was able to find matches on the internet.
02,Jun,22 08:53 mattsjohnson18: I was trying to send you a photo of me with the girl in Asheville. It's never been on my wall. I suspect that someone at some point cribbed the photos from my wall and put them online. Whatever. Also I have answered some of leopoldij's polls on this site. I'm guessing he didn't like my answers. Anyway, I'm not looking to get deleted, so I guess I'll be deleting the two pictures in question.
02,Jun,22 08:53 mattsjohnson18: Thank you for the heads up, btw. I actually appreciate that.
02,Jun,22 09:00 bella!: Hold up on deleting them, please.
02,Jun,22 09:01 bella!: I'm going to go directly to admin and ask that he intervene.
02,Jun,22 09:02 mattsjohnson18: I already deleted them, sorry. But there are plenty more of her that I took personally, plus I just uploaded a new one that I've never posted before, so I guarantee you it's nowhere else on the internet.
02,Jun,22 09:04 bella!: I posted about this "bullshit" in the Forum yesterday. Sadly, many might look at this a being a 50 point bounty for having you successfully deleted.
02,Jun,22 09:05 mattsjohnson18: I appreciate any help you can lend. I'm also willing to talk with an admin; I just have no idea how to do that. I suspect someone is just messing with me for some reason, but I don't know why.
Thank you, Jamie , for freezing leo's frivolous report and reaching out to mattsjohnson18.
The interesting thing about leo's referral of mattsjohnson18 was that mattsjohnson18 had a full series of pictures taken at this event yet leo, the numb nuts, was able to find matches on only TWO. Gee, is it possible that someone SNAGGED mattsjohnson18's pictures and posted them elsewhere? Not in leo's world, don't stand between leo and the 50 point bounty. Heck, Mr CountryCouple54 has said he's found their pictures on websites that he has not posted on. It happens, leo, get that through your thick head.
All his referrals aren't bad or frivolous HOWEVER I would say 35% are. Can you imagine reporting images that have been displayed 8 years, for cryin' out loud! There should be a statute of limitations on pictures and profiles!
Def models himself off Spoon Boy
Too bad Spooner is in the ground!
Hey, YOU draft the petition.
Me I had an agenda he is a pig and pigs get slaughtered
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Does that sound familiar?
--------------------------------------- added after 6 minutes
No worry though I have a plan for everything a diabolical plot
New Comment Go to top