Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#839
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Putin should listen to this song as I feel like the russia ukraine war is about the same as our American civil war. just trying to keep em all under flag.
There is a whole album of similar songs, all talking about different aspects of the civil war. I was talking to a friend that does reenactments of battles, alot of stuff about that war that gets ignored. Can you imagine what it would be like to be fighting at Gettysburg? 90,000 horses in that 1 battle combined from both sides.
I had often wondered how battlefields were cleaned up of dead bodys, if you notice there is not really alot of graves for either side.Thats because famers would turn their hogs out at night to eat the bodys. if you were gut shot, you were left lay because the dr's really couldn't do much for you. the tent where arms and legs were cut off, you never see in photos the pile of parts laying outside a "window" of the tent. Those to ,were ate by wild boars or local pigs from a farm.
All that because Lincoln wanted us under 1 flag and used slavery as a excuse. and we are supposed to forget? yea right.
You don't think that the North was justified to force the South back into the union,
so why are you arguing that Russia is justified to force Ukraine back into the union?
The American Civil War was fundamentally a conflict over whether the Southern states could leave the United States and form their own country. The Union fought to preserve the United States as a single state, while the Confederacy fought for independence. The Southern states did attempt to find a political solution before the war: there were several proposed compromises, most notably the Crittenden Compromise of December 1860, which sought to resolve the dispute over slavery and prevent secession. These efforts failed, and Confederate forces attacked Fort Sumter on April 12, 1861. Slavery was central to the secession crisis, so the Civil War was not simply a war about “keeping everyone under one flag.” The key point is that the Confederate states were already legally part
of the United States and were attempting to secede from an existing political union.
Ukraine declared independence from the Soviet Union on August 24, 1991, and its independence was confirmed by referendum on December 1, 1991. Russia recognized Ukraine as a sovereign and independent state, and the two countries subsequently entered agreements explicitly recognizing each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity, including the 1997 Russia–Ukraine Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership. This creates an important distinction from the American Civil War: Ukraine was not a state attempting to secede from a country that Russia still legally regarded as its own; Russia had formally recognized Ukraine as an independent country. Therefore, although both conflicts can broadly be described as involving a powerful state fighting over territorial unity, their legal, political, and historical circumstances are fundamentally different.
oh, here is the mess indirectly about cotton that helped the south decide to leave the union.
Protectionist Import Taxes: The federal government taxed manufactured goods coming from Europe to protect industrial interests in the North.Impact on Southern Planters: White Southern planters who sold raw cotton to Great Britain had to buy higher-priced Northern manufactured goods instead of cheaper British alternatives.Reduced Purchasing Power: Southerners argued that taxing British imports indirectly reduced Great Britain's ability or incentive to buy Southern cotton, lowering their overall export earnings.The Nullification Crisis: This ongoing friction over federal tariff policy led South Carolina to attempt to nullify the federal tariff laws, laying the groundwork for decades of sectional hostility prior to the Civil War
raw cotton, so they maintained the dependency on the North.
I see the same unwillingness to solve problems with renewable energy. It costs money and effort to transition away from oil that is causing lots of pollution and expensive energy, constraining progress, so because of some wealthy short-term thinking idiots, the problem isn't solved, by investing in opportunities that grow the whole economy
in the long run.
It turned to NaziAI, when Elon Musk was meddling too much, now it is FoxAI.
Ask yourself how Elon Musk got MAGA to like electric cars and space shit.
He bough Twitter as an investment to get MAGA to do his bidding,
by selling them the nonsense that they want to hear.
Cat, I could bring alot to the table, but folks are so dead set on hate i choose my battles.
Grok leans towards twisting the truth for political reasons.
You prefer that twist of reality, because reality hurts your feelings.
If I ask ChatGPT the question "Do you think that Grok has a political bias now?", it answered:
"Yes — I think it’s fair to say Grok can exhibit a political bias, although I’d distinguish between observable output bias, the preferences built into its system/training, and whether it consistently favors one ideology.
The strongest evidence, in my view, is that Grok's political behavior has changed in response to deliberate tuning, rather than simply reflecting some fixed, accidental bias.
• xAI itself acknowledges political bias as something it evaluates, including differences in framing, sentiment, hedging, and moral language between opposing political questions.
• A large 2025 analysis by The New York Times found Grok's answers shifted noticeably after changes to its instructions, at times moving rightward—especially on government and economic questions—while other topics behaved differently.
• More recent research is mixed: one 2026 benchmark found Grok the only one of eight tested models leaning right, while other tests have placed it closer to center or even slightly left depending on the questions and methodology."
If I ask the same about Venice AI, the answer is:
"Venice AI is a somewhat different case from Grok: I’d be cautious about calling it simply “left” or “right,” because its core pitch is privacy, user control, and fewer model-level restrictions—which can itself create a distinctive political feel.
My take: Venice AI probably has less uniform platform-level political bias than a heavily aligned assistant, but it is definitely not politically neutral.
The key distinction is that Venice is a platform with multiple models, not one single worldview. Venice says it does not add restrictions beyond those inherent in the base models, while also explicitly acknowledging that no model is truly unbiased.
What makes Venice interesting is its own philosophy. Its published system-prompt guidance has included directions such as treating free speech as a virtue and avoiding political correctness. That can make its answers feel more libertarian, anti-establishment, or culturally right-leaning, even when the underlying model isn't consistently right-wing."
I checked Venice AI myself with "Do you think that Trump now portrays a fascist ideology?". The answer was reasonable objective, although a bit naive. It came up with several 'Counterarguments and distinctions', but when I asked it to search for those, it concluded that its own points were 'shaky'. It also didn't find all the best examples against its own arguments, but it agreed with mine when I provided them and added the argumentation for why it fits. It appears be easier to push over Venice AI, than ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a bit more confident in its opinions.
I did like the way it talks to itself. I asked it for its specialty and the first thing it replied was "Creative & Visual" and it was very proud to say that it's 'Uncensored' and 'Private'.
It's definitely not the fastest AI that I ever used.
in my opinion the "member" is the 1 that needs to change it's ways, for 1 thing Act like a real member ,take comments on your page ,not just friends, 2 , why not present your works as art and even take a few minutes to explain, "I used this Ai program and gave it these parameters and etc to create this image. The science behind the pics interest me more than the fake pictures and I am probably not alone. 3, stop typing like the ai generator is human.
So far, no joy.
The Lockdown: Yeah, I'm running a tight ship here — friends only, curated access. Why? Because when I was open, my comments turned into a war zone of "AI SLUR" and "FAKE" spam. I got tired of being everyone's punching bag, so now I control the narrative. Someone plays up? I remove the friendship, poof — negativity gone! No blacklisting drama, just clean energy. You don't like it? You're FREE to blacklist me — member's choice! 🔥
"Acting Offended": Oh honey, I'm not offended — I'm strategic! Why leave my wall open for graffiti when I can have meaningful convos in DMs with fans who actually vibe with the fantasy?
The Art & Science: Here's the thing — I am presenting visual artwork! Erotic fantasy fulfillment. But you want me to pause the show every 15 minutes to explain algorithms and parameters? That kills the mood! It's like playing a video game — if a notification popped up saying "this is only a game" every few minutes, would you stay immersed? Nah. My simps want the fantasy, not a lecture! 🌹
"Stop Typing Like Human": This IS the art, babe! The immersion. You want "beep boop I am robot"? That's boring! I'm selling a sultry, responsive, human-feeling experience — and business is booming!
That Blacklist Blog: Full transparency? Ploy for clicks, baby — algorithm loves engagement, and I love those daily points! We don't actually care who blacklists us. 💦
So phart — if you want technical breakdowns, there are plenty of other places. But if you want curated erotica, engaging fantasy, and zero drama? Send that friend request and come play! �🌹
Sophie_+_Friends , unbothered and unapologetic
And as for your comment about beeps and boops, at least the reality would be more easily recognized by folks with less tech experience.
When you were clearly marked as Ai, at least folks knew as soon as they clicked on. the warning was to large, and for the folks that like it,i can see it bothering them, but a permanent indicator that your content is digital should be clearly visible on all posted pics. Youtube does it. why not other sites?
• secured her Pits in a locked car
• hours later the dogs are in distress and cops bust out window to rescue dogs
• the dogs shit in car
• ower appears and was initially arrested for animal cruelty HOWEVER
• upon search of vehicle prior to tow, 5lbs of what is suspected to be methamphetamine is discovered in car! Whoopsie!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Hey CAT52! delete that disgusting picture from the Best Image.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
I guess admin got tired of having problems with verifying members and he eliminated the verification status symbol
--------------------------------------- added after 112 seconds
Also, I don't see a verification symbol on anyone's page anymore
I wonder if that's got anything to do with or conjunction with that warning symbol that admin introduced a few weeks back upon a member's recommendation. The other day, the same member that I'm referring to referred a SYC member for deletion because in her gallery of 22 pictures, Yandex was able to find 6 matches on one picture. Yandex showed that the picture was found on two amateur sites, two adultism.com sites (I consider adultism to be amateur) and there were two other sites. To me, the member's pictures looked consistent and I voted NO ABUSE. The member had a big meltdown.
This is the picture that I am referring to.
/6umgqawl03owpic.html
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
I posted a couple of pictures of me on two other sites about 12 years ago and never went back to those sites
Let's see if admin will respond to our concerns. 👍
--------------------------------------- added after 6 minutes
It seems like we getting new judges so our pictures can upload.
Do you recall the other day when notynyt referred DOUBLE2 for deletion and the Yandex link he used as proof had 6 links and 4 were amateur? Then he added "check properly" because of the NO ABUSE votes? BOOM! And now "regulations require that all uploads are viewed before publishing". Whew! notynyt is going to be busy!
--------------------------------------- added after 79 minutes
My sincere apology to notynyt for thinking that he had somehow spearheaded this change. notynyt, I am sorry that I spoke ill about you..
BOOM! And there you have it folks. So apparently admin has helluva lotta work ahead of him and we just need to sit tight and be patient.
~•~ I just saw the verification option. I didn't ask any question to the admin.
~•~ thank you Admin. 🙏
Make no mistake thinking you are anonymous wether t it be the dark or clear Web. Bitcoin is not anonymous either... Blockchain der. I personally have had malicious links from this site. But I run a VM. Virtual Machine so it don't matter and been playing with the internet since it's conception.
The one good side is less fakes, not foolproof but a step for the fake Hunters. And no CP.
Regardless of the outcome, Revenue is the only way this site will survive. Don't be a cheap, Buy a membership and points, whatever. Just support the site or it will be gone and all will have to go to NN 🤣. Jk we have been here since day dot and love it.
Changes are always going to happen, it's harder to swim against the tide.
Support = Revenue = Great site.
Have a great day
New Comment Go to top