Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!

Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Tired of ads
on this site?

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#183

Started by CAT-2 [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51  other posts
NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF. POST WHAT YOU LIKE, ASK WHAT YOU LIKE, LEAVE MSGS HERE. PLEASE BE CIVIL. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BITCH, DO IT WITH SOME CLASS. IF YOU LIKE WHAT'S WRITTEN,COMMENT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU SEE, COMMENT. ALL I ASK IS PROOF.

New Comment       Rating: 3  


Comments:
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 07,May,24 10:44 other posts 
I’ve been referring to a certain individual as “The Clown”. I’m now changing the way I refer to this individual. From now on he’s “Mr Von Shitzinpants”. 🤣🤣😈
--------------------------------------- added after 11 hours

You win, Sir-Skittles. You, your family, and your friends, are little more than cow shit. I’m leaving the site. You are a troll, just like your fellow members. 💩💩
By Gntlmn [Ignore] 07,May,24 16:50 other posts 
The diplomatic name for "Putin's analinguist"
By Sir-Skittles [Ignore] 07,May,24 21:36 other posts 
where did all the posts go here?


By Sir-Skittles [Ignore] 07,May,24 18:16 other posts 
/blogs/57268.html#t0

New blog up!


By CAT-2 [Ignore] 23,Apr,24 09:08 other posts 
What Actually Controls The Price Of Gas In The US?
Carolyn Osorio

Between keyboard warriors and comments sections, you might have noticed conflicting (and sometimes even downright incorrect) information about how, exactly, gas prices work in America today. While some popular opinions involve blaming whatever the current administration is for increases in gas prices, the issue is far more complicated than any singular person or even any singular government. In fact, the Energy Information Administration identifies four major factors that directly correlate to the cost of gas (and none of them are the president). These factors are crude oil prices (which are set by oil-producing countries), refining costs (which are increasingly impacted by natural disasters and climate change), distribution and marketing costs (which depend on the individual retailer you purchase gas from), and taxes (federal, state, and local taxes and fees).
--------------------------------------- added after 98 seconds

only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 23,Apr,24 13:57 other posts 
thank you
Ok, 1, crude oil prices set by producing countries.
IF we were able to use our own oil, we could set the price of our own oil and not be affected by other countries.
2, refining cost, are directly linked to climate change prompted regulations as well.
Distribution and marketing, if if gas was regulated like electric and telephone, the cost would be steady and easier to budget each month because the cost would be predictable.
4, taxes, again, the government could change it's tax schemes to help the people. the 3 reason is the only 1 that at the moment can't be fixed directly by ANY administration in power at any given time.
DITCH OPEC and use our own damn oil.
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 23,Apr,24 18:17 other posts 
We do use our own oil. You mistake trading one country's oil for another to reduce cost of transportation as not using our own oil. This is wrong. Stop pushing this. In the end, this too is something controlled by the oil companies.
Taxes are needed to maintain the infrastructure. The alternative is paying a higher income tax if you have a driver's licence.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes

Phone and electricity costs are local or semi local. Can you imagine finding a way to charge for gas? It's ludicrous.
By phart [Ignore] 30,Apr,24 20:53 other posts 
Ok cat, if biden can't do anything about gas prices, why is he being pressured to do so?
And what the hell are democrats trying to do? finish killing off the economy? we need affordable gas to keep the country moving.
only registered users can see external links
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 01,May,24 06:38 other posts 
This is a political subject, not a gas availability issue. We'll have to see what Biden does.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes

The bottom line is, if you don't like what's happening in this administration, vote them out.........but, if they get reelected, THEN more agree with them than not. I think and hope they win. The Clown is not an option.
By phart [Ignore] 01,May,24 10:04 other posts 
please cat,if neither are good the job, give us another choice!
at the moment,Trump is the only thing we have to choose except for biden,and I would burn down the voting booth and go to jail before i would vote for that man
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 01,May,24 10:31 other posts 
I can’t give you another choice. You (plural), are giving the Clown the go ahead. You guys had the chance to put a better choice that could beat Biden and put the Clown away.
By phart [Ignore] 01,May,24 11:06 other posts 
Ok so who would that choice have been?
It is time for answers, And frankly the short answer at the moment is no 1 wants the job that you would approve of other than a liberal democrat because of the way Trump is being treated. Would you put yourself up on a podium to be treated like he is right now?
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 01,May,24 17:38 other posts 
Nicky did.
By phart [Ignore] 01,May,24 18:30 other posts 
and kamalla woulda been her vice probably. I don't like her for alot of reasons.
she also sold a bunch of state owned land to the chinese, boy talk about a real patriot.
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 01,May,24 19:25 other posts 
Nicky Haley is a Republican. Harris is a Democrat.
By phart [Ignore] 01,May,24 20:36 other posts 
Well, alot of folks don't see much difference between haley and a democrat
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 02,May,24 08:30 other posts 
There’s not supposed to be a big difference. Traditional Republicans believe in the same things that traditional Democrats believe in. The difference is in the way they reach those things.
Neither group wants to a leader to call, on his own, whether an election is fair. Nor do they want to allow the military to be the enforcers of presidential power. Neither wants to have the government to monitor pregnant women’s pregnancy. Neither wants mass deportations of MILLIONS of illegal immigrants, at the expense of the taxpayers, may I add.
That is what we, the public, want. Sensible leaders who can be chosen to actually LEAD following the rules of law. From either group.
By phart [Ignore] 02,May,24 10:01 other posts 
good luck with that. It hasn't been that good in decades.
Don't let the illegals in, and you don't have to figure out how to get rid of them.
Kinda like preventing cancer,don't smoke and that will greatly reduce the chances of getting it.
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 02,May,24 11:04 other posts 
So true. Now give us a lawful way to do that.
By phart [Ignore] 02,May,24 11:14 other posts 
simple, encounter a suspected illegal. Ask for government issued id and social security number. If none are provided, detain,investigate,and deport.
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 02,May,24 12:30 other posts 
Great except that's being done already. How's that working?
By phart [Ignore] 02,May,24 13:17 other posts 
Not well because to much effort is being wasted on unrelated things Every step the texas governor is trying, and the feds are fighting him tooth and nail.
By kebmo [Ignore] 02,May,24 14:21 other posts 
The Transmountain pipeline from Alberta to tidewater in Vancouver is now open. This tripples is the amount of crude oil being shipped out of our country but not to the United States.
The NAFTA agreement says that any oil that Canada sells to the US or Mexico has to be the same price as we sell it to other Canadian refineries and vice versa. A lot of his oil may now leave the country by way of this new pipeline which opened this week.
Alberta oil is in a landlocked situation and getting it to tidewater to ship overseas has been a desire of ours for decades.
This pipeline is huge to Alberta. It triples our tidewater shipping capacity from 300,000 barrels per day to 890,000 barrels per day. If the US is no longer receiving some of this oil it could very well affect the gasoline prices in the US because that oil will have to be bought somewhere else at world prices as opposed to NAFTA prices.
Where Alberta oil goes has always been a very contentious issue in Canada. Alberta (and the federal government) wanted to build this pipeline east (Energy East) instead of west to supply Ontario, Quebec and our Maritime provinces but Quebec said no so we went west and will sell it to the world (Asia) at a higher price.
Every time oil prices change by one dollar it affects the Alberta economy by $100 million.
By phart [Ignore] 02,May,24 15:19 other posts 
I thought Nafta was replaced?

only registered users can see external links

I will have to read thru it later

only registered users can see external links
By kebmo [Ignore] 02,May,24 15:49 other posts 
Because most of Canadian oil was shipped to the US we only had one customer. The reason we didn’t have more customers was because Alberta oil is landlocked and was unable to get to the sea to ship globally. Now that this new pipeline is open we do have access to global markets so we will be able to get more money for our oil. Supply and demand.
By phart [Ignore] 02,May,24 17:38 other posts 
um. well something is amiss because wholesale gas is down to 2.59 a galllon.
By kebmo [Ignore] 02,May,24 20:59 other posts 
Well then be sure to send a thank you note to Mr. Biden!
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 03,May,24 09:17 other posts 
By phart [Ignore] 03,May,24 14:44 other posts 
his admin is trying find ways to make it cost more,didn't you see all that ruckus last week on the net?
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 03,May,24 15:41 other posts 
???
By phart [Ignore] 03,May,24 20:28 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
By kebmo [Ignore] 02,May,24 14:24 other posts 
only registered users can see external links


By leopoldij [Ignore] 03,May,24 19:18 other posts 
David Dennison is fucked up.
By phart [Ignore] 03,May,24 20:23 other posts 
only registered users can see external links


jealous of his intellect?


By phart [Ignore] 27,Apr,24 14:27 other posts 
Democrat lost more than his shirt in san fransico,the land of rice a roni and street thugs.
only registered users can see external links
By leopoldij [Ignore] 27,Apr,24 15:43 other posts 
By the way, you should know that when you link stuff from Microsoft, one must have an account in order to read them; otherwise did, they're not available to a person without an account. And, of course, many won't open an account in order to access that shit site.
By phart [Ignore] 27,Apr,24 18:10 other posts 
I don't have a account, it just comes up when I do a search.
only registered users can see external links
By leopoldij [Ignore] 27,Apr,24 19:26 other posts 
Then, I guess, it's free only for people in the US. I honestly can't access this content.
By phart [Ignore] 27,Apr,24 23:44 other posts 
good gosh, i can't either on that last link and I just went to it and thought it was easy,
I will try again.
Adam Schiffs luggage is stolen from his car in san fransisco.
Perhaps a uk paper will have a page?
only registered users can see external links
By leopoldij [Ignore] 28,Apr,24 00:17 other posts 
Ok, I accessed this last one from the guardian. Works. Sad story. But he should be careful in places with lots of thieves.

Sometimes a page will give different kind of privileges to different users, depending on their location, on the number of times they accessed the site before, on the kind of computer they have and on the type of browser.
By phart [Ignore] 28,Apr,24 09:27 other posts 
I use the firefox browser for most stuff, have been using Brave for youtube nowadays as it cuts out all the ads
I just find it so ironic that soft on crime democrats are getting socked in the wallet just as everyone else by having to pay for car windows and most property to replace what was taken.
IF they kept the crooks locked up,95% of it would not be happening.
Is that newsworthy to you? Ahuh, ahuh, a Democrat got his shit stolen.
Yeah, crime exists, Democrats know that. But, just like your Republican politicians, they are all rich and don't have to care about living in the world that you live in.

Still, Democrats actually have good plans to reduce crime.
only registered users can see external links
The irony is, REPUBLICANS think 'defunding the police' will help.
only registered users can see external links

Republicans just keep telling you that tougher punishment will help.
It's nothing but bullshit for gullible people. They are incapable of doing anything useful, so the only thing they have to get voters, is lying that everything is getting worse because of the Democrats and then saying that they have the solutions.

Republicans are incapable of imagining solutions, just like you.
This is the level of your thinking:
- Mental illness? -> Lock them up!
- Crime? -> Just kill all the criminals!
- Immigrants coming for your jobs? -> Build a wall!
- Poor people? -> They should work harder!
- People cannot afford medication? -> Leave it up to the market!
- School shooting? -> Give guns to the stressed out teachers!
- Climate change? -> The earth's weather has always changed!
- Unwanted pregnancies? -> Their own fault for fucking!
- Black people protesting police violence? -> Shut the fuck up!
- Students protesting genocide by Israel? -> Shut the fuck up!
- Free speech? -> My right to say the N-word and be a douche online!

I wouldn't want to straw-man you, so tell me if you don't agree with any of them.
In any case, it's the thinking of primitive people, and it's what your mind is reduced to, when you only watch right-wing media.

Republicans have a House majority. It's their responsibility to create laws to provide those solutions, even if they are your stupid solutions. But they have not! None of the problems ever get solved when a Republican is in power. They stop talking about those problems when a Republican is in power, but as soon as a Democrat enters the White house, all those problems are back, the day after. What happened?
Didn't your president solve those problems?

Sure, your House majority has to work with the Democrat majority in the Senate, but they didn't even try. There has never been a House this ineffectieve ever. They are only fighting among themselves, because some of them want to do nothing and shut down the government completely and others want to keep the country running.
None of them actually want to do anything USEFUL.
By phart [Ignore] 28,Apr,24 09:26 other posts 
you know as well as I do if the legs don't part,nothing grows in the womb
so why would anyone disagree with that 1?
You are not 100% wrong in most of your thinking,the problem is you don't realize, there is NO FIXING alot of the people out there that are on drugs or that commit crimes by habit.
You waste time and money on rehabing someone and the next day after they are free from jail they are right back in.
Dope heads, they are hooked, and it is their fault for the most part,no one held a gun to their head and said,"take this". they took it on their own.

Work earns a wage, it does help poverty.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Apr,24 11:29 other posts 
So, basically, you agreed with every point, is what you're saying.

You are tricked by 'populism'. It is a belief in simple solutions to complex problems. Some of those problems are real, but they always misrepresent the causes.
When people don't understand the causes, there is no possibility of introducing real solutions. That's why populism always fails in solving the problems.
In fact, mostly the problems will only get worse. It always fails, but keeps pointing
to others for their failure.

"When populism runs out of road, it blames the road."

You keep blaming people. How come that your people suck so much then?
Americans are the hardest working people in the modern world. Then why are there so much more poor people in the US, than in most of the modern world?
It just doesn't make sense.
only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 30,Apr,24 11:48 other posts 
because there aren't as many people working hard in America as you are lead to believe.
THe definition of "hard work" has changed drastically over the years.

Hard work is going down in the coal mines , hard work is welding pipe lines, digging ditches. Used to be that running heavy machinery like bulldozers was hard work but now they are enclosed ,air conditioned, gps navigated and so on to a point it is hardly more difficult that driving a Toyota.

Young people think working 8 hours at Mc Donalds is hard work, and that type thing is what skews the numbers to the benefit of the stats you read.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Apr,24 12:04 other posts 
If hard work reduces poverty, why are they so poor in countries where people are doing the most and the hardest work?

You worked hard, when you worked. You know it didn't pay well.
I sit on my ass all day and that pays a lot more.

That hard work, you are supporting, is terribly inefficient.
Machinery makes working much more efficient.
That bulldozer required a hardened man, now any woman can do it.
That's why productivity has gone through the roof and is still climbing.
That's creating more value with less people. That added value is just mostly going to the wealthy. That's why the middle class, doing the actual work, is declining and why the upper class, who don't do any hard work, is more wealthy than ever before.

If you value hard work so much, why do you like the wealthy so much?
None of them are shoveling coal or welding pipes.
By phart [Ignore] 30,Apr,24 12:14 other posts 
Without the wealthy, who is going to pay for the research, development, salary's of the jobs the hard working people do?

Also I was thinking and was coming back to mention another point.
Do these charts and specs take into account what is considered wealthy in other countries compared to the US?

Jeff bezo's is wealthy in the US, but Strive Masiyiwa is considered wealthy in zimbabwa.
BIG difference in the amount of money
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 30,Apr,24 14:42 other posts 
This first sentence is you putting the cart before the horse. All initial endeavors start with an idea. After, if successful, then more research can be done. Investors grease the work, but, many times, the investors are middle income people that either invest a few coins or donate to a worthy cause.
I have no beef with megazillionaires, but, they did make their money on the shoulders of the common people.
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 02,May,24 09:05 other posts 
Phart, young people is not a good group to base the thinking of the average adult. Just about every young person starts their work life at a low skill job. All I have to do is look at morning traffic to realize most people GO TO WORK. What they work at is not the measuring stick for hard work. Swinging a pick is much less challenging than figuring out complex problems that require long periods of time to solve.
How many pick handlers do you know off that could develop penicillin or a polio vaccine? How many welders do you know that could invent a transistor ? How many rednecks do you know that can design a space vehicle of any kind? How many blue collar workers do you know that can calculate the monthly payment of a loan at 6% for a period of 3 yrs?
I’m not putting down those other people that do those jobs you’ve mentioned. My Dad was a redneck and proud of it. He worked construction out in the Florida and Carribean sun all his adult life and before that he was in the Army Air Corp.
There’s no way to define “hard work” except to say it’s an activity a person tries hard to do.
By phart [Ignore] 02,May,24 09:54 other posts 
I am a redneck that can weld and understand electronics!
By CAT-2 [Ignore] 02,May,24 09:57 other posts 
Yeah, but what about LIBERAL WOMEN.


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#183



Show your Genitals