Clerk of the Court; Pro-Temp Judge Tomasina will be presiding over the case of CAT52!


SITO Members, plaintiffs,

vs.

CAT52!,defendant.
____________________________/

........................COMPLAINT...........................

This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES

1. The defendant CAT52! posted several pictures on her profile that are more than 10 years old.

2. The evidence also shows that most of these pictures are photoshopped so they can appear new.

3. The defendant has acknowledged the pictures are photoshopped.

COUNT II. POSTING PICTURES OF SEX PREDATOR

1. The evidence shows the defendant has posted pictures of her sex-predator husband.

2. Under the rules of this Court no member should promote in any way the conduct of a sex offender by his name or pictures.

3. This Court orders this defendant to remove or delete any pictures of the following member; Woody. In refusing to remove his pictures you are promoting sexual predator conduct and this is not acceptable,


Judge Tomasina's case decision: Ms. CAT52, I don't know the reason for posting an old picture from 10 years ago. It looks like you are desperate to attract more members to your page.
I order you to take down those pictures immediately.

SITO members, plaintiffs,

vs.

CAT52!a/k/a saggy granny defendant.
____________________________________/

..................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all statements on this document to be true, based on the evidence.

COUNT I. PERJURY

1. The evidence shows the defendant has committed misinformation.

2. The defendant claims her husband left her which is completely false.

3. The defendant's husband still living with the defendant but in separate rooms at the same house.

COUNT II. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. The defendant is charged with rule 139. Under this rule, no other(s) member is allowed to attack an immunity member.

2. Rules 139 also says; No other members cannot defame, verbally, profane, or attack an immunity member. The defendant violated this rule when she attacked an immunity member, Sir-Skittles, in a chat room and on blogs.

COUNT III. CHAT ROOM VIOLATION

1. The defendant violated the rules of a chat room when she used profane language.

2. Defendant CAT52! use the word(s) fuck you and other foul language against member Sir-Skittles.

3. There is decorum in every chat room, and the defendant violated it several times.

Judge RuFino's Decision; Ms.CAT52! You have been in this Court more times than the time you changed your panties. You have a filthy mouth and you're disgusting. You don't behave like a 77-year-old woman but rather like a 15-year-old
girl. You will be now on probation for 30 days. This Court will be monitoring your activities in chat rooms, blogs, and forums.

June 4, 2025

SITO members, plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!, defendant.
___________________________/

This Court declares the statements on this document to be true based on the case's evidence.

COUNT I VIOLATION OF RULE 151

1. The defendant CAT52! violated rule 151 which is posting obsolete pictures on this site.

2. Under rule 151 no member shall post profile pictures of more than 20 years old. The evidence shows the defendant posted a picture in the Best Image/Member section that is 30 years old.

3. The defendant CAT52! knows that the picture in question is not the way she actually looks today which constitutes a violation of Rule 151.

JUDGE Tomasina; Ms.CAT52! I found you guilty of the above charge. I order you to delete that picture within 20 days or you will be in contempt of Court.

May 25, 2025

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

Ananas2xlekker, defendant.
___________________________/

....................COMPLAINT........................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION RULE 139

1. The defendant has violated rule 139, which is Attacking an Immunity member.

2. The above rules state no other member is allowed to attack, degrade, and make false accusations to a member under rule 139.

3. The defendant Ananas2xlekker attacked member Sir-Skittles on a forum. This is a violation of Rule 139.


Judge RuFino's decision; Mr. Ananas2xlekker you have a foul mouth. This Court will not tolerate you attacking other members under the Immunity rule. You must control yourself and use your language carefully. I found you guilty of the above charge. You are now on probation for 30 days.

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/

.........................COMPLAINT>......................

This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT

1. The evidence shows the defendant, GingerDaddy abandoned his chat room on Tuesday the 27th of May 2025.

2. The Defendant opened a chat room the previous day in the evening and maintained it for almost 2 hours.

3. On the second hour, the defendant did not announce that he was leaving, which is a violation and is considered Chat Room Abandonment.

Judge Rufinos' Decision; Mr. GingerDaddy why is so hard for you to tell all the guests in your room that you are
leaving your room? I will not tolerate the disrespect that you have shown your room guests. You are outrageous. If you continue with this type of action I will put a Gag Order on you.

May 29, 2025

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

50YOBaldDick, defendant.
__________________________/

......................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant 50YOBaldDick is violating the Clean Page Act rule. His page is full of dirty gifts.

2. The defendant received several warnings to clean his page but he refused to clean it.

3. This Court will not tolerate this kind of filthyness on a member's page.


Judge Florisbinda; Mr. 50YOBaldDick your page is a big mess. I found you guilty of the above charge. You have 20 days to clean your page or you will be in Contempt of Court.

May 24, 2025

SITO Members, plaintiffs.

v.

CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/

....................COMPLAINT..........................

This Court declares that all the statements on this complaint are true based on the evidence.

COUNT I. WITNESS TAMPERING

1. The defendant CAT52! destroyed evidence in the case of Novice.

2. Defendant Novice's page was dirty with negative gifts and CAT52! use other gifts to destroy the evidence. This constitutes a violation of the rules and laws.


JUDGE: RuFino: Ms. CAT52, what you did is not acceptable. You have committed a serious violation. No one is allowed to destroy evidence in a case. You are outrageous. You are guilty of the above charge.

May 21, 2025

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

bella!, defendant.
__________________________/

....................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the evidence of this case to be true based on the evidence.

COUNT I. USING FAKE PROFILE

1. Under the rules of this Court members shall not have fake profiles.

2. The evidence shows the defendant has about 7 fake profiles on this site. See the attachment Exhibit 1; /blogs/59782.html

3. The defendant used those profiles to attack other members she dislikes.


COUNT II. MAKING FALSE ACCUSATIONS

1. The defendant bella! has made some accusations against member PITBULL.

2. Defendant claims member PITBULL has other profiles on this site.

3. The member above doesn't have other profiles. Her claims are baseless and this Court will not allow a member to make false accusations with tangible evidence.


Judge Fredesbinda, Ms. Bella, you have a big mouth, and I found you guilty of the above charges. On Count I, you must delete all those fake profiles immediately.

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

Novice, defendant.
__________________________/

...................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.

COUNT I. VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant Novice has violated the Clean Page Act rule. His page is filthy with negative gifts.

2. The defendant refused to clean his page and continued violating the rule.

3. The defendant has enough points to clean his page.


Judge RuFino; Mr. Novive is time to clean your disgusting page. You are guilty of the above charge. You have 20 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court.

May 19, 2025

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/

////////////////////COMPLAINT///////////////////////

This Cout declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on all evidence.

COUNT I. POSTING A FAKE LINK IN THE CHAT ROOM

1. On May 12 , the defendant posted a fake link in the chat room.

2. It is prohibited to post fake links in chat rooms with the intent to defraud members. The link was not clear, appearing blurry or did not exist.

3. Members asked the defendant what type of link was but he refused to say.

4. The link damages the configuration of the chat room.

Judge RuFino: Mjr. GingerDaddy if you continue posting fake links, this Court will suspend all your chat room privileges immediately. Stop acting like a child.

May 13, 2025

SITO Members, plaintiffs

vs.

CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/

.....................COMPLAINT.....................

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.

COUNT I . POSTING A FAKE PICTURE(S)

1. The defendant CAT52! has violated rule 113, which states, "No Member shall post fake pictures as part of their profile."

2. The defendant posted a fake picture in the; Best Image/Top Member section. The picture got low ratings after member PITBULL mentioned in the blog section.

3. The defendant posted the fake picture to get more members to her profile page.


May 10, 2025

Judge; Claribilda; Ms. CAT52! you are outrageous in posting fake pics on this site to get more members to your page. You want members to believe the picture you posted is yours. The evidence shows it is not. You are a complete fraud.
YOU ARE GUILTY for Violating rule 113 of this Court.

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

vs.

MiniD, defendant.
___________________________/

........................COMPLAINT...........................

The Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on all evidence.


COUNT I. VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant MiniD has violated the Clean Page Act. His page is full of negative gifts.

2. Under the Clean Page Act every member must maintain their page clean at all times. The Defendant has refused to clean his page.

3. This defendant has shown disrespect for the rules and laws of this Court.


Judge Florisbinda; Mr. MiniD you're guilty of the above charges. I will give you 20 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court.

minid a 3 inch stump cock loser! He pisses on his own small sack when he sits to pee!

You bucket of shaved ass hairs- Your page will not be safe!

Banning rat cunt!

Private Chat Log with SYSTEM. Page 1
Apr 27, 03:24 system: You were blacklisted by MiniD

Clerk of the Court; this hearing on the case of CAT52! charged with witness tampering.


SITO Members, plaintiffs,

vs.

CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;


COUNT I. WITNESS TAMPERING

1. The defendant CAT52! tampering with evidence on the case minid.

2. The evidence shows the defendant used or sent members MiniD gifts to cover the page of MiniD gifts with her gifts.

3. The defendant violated the rules of tampering with evidence.


Judge; Fredesbinda, Ms.CAT52 you're outrageous with you use your points to tamper with evidence on the case of MiniD. You are guilty of the above charges.

Clerk of the Court; This Court hearing is now open on the case of member miniD now a defendant charged with VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE.


SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,

v.

MiniD, defendant.
__________________________/

........................COMPLAINT.........................

This Court declares all statements on this complain are true based on the evidence.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT.

1. The defendant MiniD has violated rule 102 which Members must maintain their page free of negative gifts at all times. Under the Clean Page Act, more than 3 negative the page is dirty and in violation of the rule.

2. The defendant has received notices to clean his page but he refused.

3. The defendant' page is dirty and in Violation of the Clean Page Act Rule for the past 2 weeks.


Judge RuFino; Mr. MiniD your are disgusting and a pig. Look at your page. You must clean you page withing the next 2 weeks or be in Contempt of Court.


4/24/25

Clerk of the Court; Pro-Temp Judge Tomasina will be presiding over this Hearing.


Hearing on the Violation of Probation
Defendant; GingerDaddy

This Court has decided to charge the defendant, GingerDaddy with Violation of Probation on his previous case. I will give this defendant an explanation on why he violated hi probation.

Judge Tomasina
4/26/25

Clerk of the Court; This Court is open for the case of CAT52!.

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!@
a/k/a Saggy Granny, defendant.
_________________________________/

........................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case;

COUNT I VIOLATION PAGE ACT

1. The defendant's profile is showing negative gifts.

2. The defendant is violating the following Clean PAGE ACT RULE, which states that each member must maintain their profile page clean of any negative gifts. A member receives a warning to clean up his/her page.

3. The defendant's page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks.


COUNT II CONTEMPT OF COURT

1. The defendant in a previous Court order has been ordered to stop banned members from commenting on her page.

2. Defendant's actions are considered refusal to obey and follow the Court orders.


COUNT III SOLICITING TO CLEAN PROFILE PAGE

1. The defendant is soliciting for cleaning her page.

2. The defendant asked member, PITBULL to clean her dirty page. Member PITBULL refused her request.

3. No member shall order another member to clean a page unless they do so voluntarily.


COUNT IV ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. The defendant has violated the rule of the Immunity Member Act. Under this Act no member is allow to; defame, attack, send negative gifts or be blacklisted.

2. The defendant CAT52! violated this ACT several times when she attacked the following Immunity Memge Sir-Skittles.


Judge; RuFino; You are GUILTY of the above charges and you should refrain from making comments on blogs and forums on this site.

3/7/25