cat52!- where is that pic you old loon? Everyone knows you did not have that surgery! In fact, most heart surgery does not involve cracking the chest these days. Just a small incision. A pathetic attempt to get attention and to remain relevant!
And speaking of pictures, I had a professional photographer analyze her pictures. Several of her pictures were taken on 35mm film- last used in the 1990's! Here is his official report to detect her fraud:
1. Film Grain
Visible, irregular grain structure is one of the most distinct signs of 35mm film. Unlike digital noise, film grain:
Is more uniform in the shadows
Varies across the image in a natural, organic way
Differs by film stock (e.g., Kodak vs. Fujifilm)
2. Color and Tonal Characteristics
Scanned film often shows:
Subtle color shifts, sometimes with a slight green, red, or magenta tint
Lower contrast in raw scans unless edited
Smooth highlight roll-off; blown-out areas look softer than digital clipping
Richer shadows and dynamic range in black and white film
3. Edge Artifacts
If the scan includes the film border, you may see:
Sprocket holes
Film type markings like Kodak 400TX
Frame numbers
These are strong indicators of 35mm film origin.
4. File Metadata
Scanned images often lack typical EXIF data (camera model, lens, shutter speed, ISO, etc.).
If present, metadata might mention a scanner (e.g., Epson V600, Plustek, Nikon Coolscan), revealing its scanned-from-film origin.
Resolution may also be unusual, such as 3420 × 2280.
5. Halation and Bloom
Some film stocks, especially color negative film, create a soft red or orange glow around bright light sources, known as halation.
This glow is not present in purely digital images.
6. Imperfections
Scanned film images may contain:
Dust or small scratches
Fibers or specks from the scanning surface
Slight vignetting or edge softness if not scanned perfectly
7. Subject and Context
Sometimes the subject matter gives a clue:
Dated clothing, cars, or architecture- like what we see in her pictures!
A vintage aesthetic or composition style
Conclusion:
Not a single picture is less than 20 plus years old! A site fraud!
Other comments from our trained fraud detector:
-what kind of old cow puts pictures of her old wrinkled body on a sex site?
- Face of a prawn, body of a rhino, and legs of a sumo wrestler!
- Her tits look like a student driver crushed some traffic cones!
- That snatch looks so loose she if she sat on someone's face, they would be wearing a 10 gallon hat! Disgusting I know!
hey CAT52!-saggy granny delete that 30-year-old picture from the Best Image/Member. You only have 3% of the vote you filthy cunt --------------------------------------- added after 14 hours
hey, you dyke bella! prove to me that I have multiple profiles here. Please list the names of the profiles you claim I have here. I am not like you who have several profiles here.
FUCK YOU BITCH --------------------------------------- added after 11 hours
The poor Jamie went to bella! to cry because he claims I blacklisted here. I don't blacklist. Blacklist is for cowards and site rats like you and your mommy old fart bella!
Nasty bella! old cow, you lied about me posting this on Sir-Skittles page; Fuck off bella!. There is nothing in there on his page. You made that up you lying bitch cow
Based on some of my investigations bella! was jealous of the former member *lipsipsuckit*. This member a female was a greeter here when a new member signed in. The filthy coward bella! hate her so much that she pushed for her to get out of this site. She id not longer member here. Now bella! is doing what *lipsipsuckit was doing when she was a member here. The only reason bella! is doing it is to get more members to her page.
I to hated lixsipsucket any woman that weighed over 300 pounds and made the comment that all the other women on this site was just burnt toast compared to her is nothing but a conceded cunt i could tell you stories about her going clear back to the first time I came in contact with her none of them good
Poor, old, and retarded! She is a disaster!
cat52!- where is that pic you old loon? Everyone knows you did not have that surgery! In fact, most heart surgery does not involve cracking the chest these days. Just a small incision. A pathetic attempt to get attention and to remain relevant!
And speaking of pictures, I had a professional photographer analyze her pictures. Several of her pictures were taken on 35mm film- last used in the 1990's! Here is his official report to detect her fraud:
1. Film Grain
Visible, irregular grain structure is one of the most distinct signs of 35mm film. Unlike digital noise, film grain:
Is more uniform in the shadows
Varies across the image in a natural, organic way
Differs by film stock (e.g., Kodak vs. Fujifilm)
2. Color and Tonal Characteristics
Scanned film often shows:
Subtle color shifts, sometimes with a slight green, red, or magenta tint
Lower contrast in raw scans unless edited
Smooth highlight roll-off; blown-out areas look softer than digital clipping
Richer shadows and dynamic range in black and white film
3. Edge Artifacts
If the scan includes the film border, you may see:
Sprocket holes
Film type markings like Kodak 400TX
Frame numbers
These are strong indicators of 35mm film origin.
4. File Metadata
Scanned images often lack typical EXIF data (camera model, lens, shutter speed, ISO, etc.).
If present, metadata might mention a scanner (e.g., Epson V600, Plustek, Nikon Coolscan), revealing its scanned-from-film origin.
Resolution may also be unusual, such as 3420 × 2280.
5. Halation and Bloom
Some film stocks, especially color negative film, create a soft red or orange glow around bright light sources, known as halation.
This glow is not present in purely digital images.
6. Imperfections
Scanned film images may contain:
Dust or small scratches
Fibers or specks from the scanning surface
Slight vignetting or edge softness if not scanned perfectly
7. Subject and Context
Sometimes the subject matter gives a clue:
Dated clothing, cars, or architecture- like what we see in her pictures!
A vintage aesthetic or composition style
Conclusion:
Not a single picture is less than 20 plus years old! A site fraud!
Other comments from our trained fraud detector:
-what kind of old cow puts pictures of her old wrinkled body on a sex site?
- Face of a prawn, body of a rhino, and legs of a sumo wrestler!
- Her tits look like a student driver crushed some traffic cones!
- That snatch looks so loose she if she sat on someone's face, they would be wearing a 10 gallon hat! Disgusting I know!
A true mule!
--------------------------------------- added after 14 hours
It's now 0% rating
Saggy is a stupid old mule rat! cat52!
You are a fucking senile and retard lesbian
no reply from Jaime so far.
fuck you bella!
FUCK YOU BITCH
--------------------------------------- added after 11 hours
bella!'s fake profiles; /blogs/59782.html
FUCK YOU JAMIE AND BELLA!
Fuck you Jamie
If you actually love that sex predator... you will delete your shit stain profile!
You dumb cunt cat52!
--------------------------------------- added after 16 hours
cat52! fucks sake- stop spending time on this site- Go take care of your vegetable
--------------------------------------- added after 18 hours
Death is following him like flies on shit!
A story about her entering a cunt contest!
/polls/5460.html
Dirty mule cat52!
FUCK YOU bella!
Both are now living in an outback village. Lix has gained 30 more pounds!
In fact, the State of Florida is buying her cunt fumes for the gas chamber. It is faster and less expensive!
cat52! you should dunk that rat minge in chemicals to get rid of the stench!
New Comment Go to top