Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!

Trump/Pence or Biden/Harris...Which do you feel will prevail???

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #2

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#69

Started by tecsan [Ignore] 09,Sep,20 03:45  other posts
Trump has been somewhat erratic at times...But look at Creepy sleepy uncle joe...Pence pretty clean, but not totally...Harris, now I wonder like I do with uncle joe...??? (I agree it is about 50/50 with the flaws concerning both parties)...༼☯﹏☯༽

New Comment       Rating: -6  


Comments:
By phart [Ignore] 20,Jan,25 12:55 other posts 
Well this question was answered a short time ago.
TRUMP PREVALED.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 20,Jan,25 12:59 other posts 
Yep, absolutely ridiculous, but true.
By phart [Ignore] 20,Jan,25 14:06 other posts 
As he has demonstrated, this country can accomplish the impossible. I am looking forward to the improvements.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 20,Jan,25 16:40 other posts 
Just so we are clear about what you think Trump will do and achieve,
so you cannot wiggle your way out, when everything goes to shit for the working class, people can afford groceries even less, inflation becomes even worse, Trump starts wars with countries who didn't attack yours, Trump gives big parts of Ukraine to Putin and as soon as he's gone, Russia attacks Ukraine again, the military budget will only go up, Trump doesn't use money from tariffs to pay for childcare, a trade-war starts a big economic crisis, Trump really doesn't give a fuck about free speech and goes after journalists and censors every opinion he doesn't like, he does end up doing law-fare against his political enemies, he does make Project 2025 his major agenda after denying he was even involved, and/or he has the Supreme Court criminalize being gay and trans and abortion even in case the mother's life is in danger. These are all things your side said Trump wouldn't do. Do you agree?

So, let's hear your predictions. What would be improvements to you?

I guess the main point is kicking out illegals. I agree they don't belong in your country. How about particularly sad cases of people who are on a political enemies of a brutal dictator, who wants to torture and murder them? How about if those illegals you send away, it's just a flood of H-1B visas, replacing the jobs of Americans.
A clear implementation of 'the great replacement theory', would you think that is an improvement?

What's your goal for inflation and people's ability to afford groceries?
What's the route to MAGA?
By phart [Ignore] 20,Jan,25 16:48 other posts 
IF his actions stave off further increases, if his actions slow down illegal immigration, slow down the drugs coming into America, alot of us will understand that everything couldn't be accomplished,so many road blocks to over come. H-1B folks, why is that a problem? You want LEGAL immigration don't you? Wouldn't most of the 1's here want that? DUH.
It is the illegal part that is the problem. If he slows that down, great. it is a matter of starting treatment for the countries problems. when a dr trys to help someone,sometimes they fail ,we hope they don't but sometimes they do. Trump will have to fight tooth and nail again to accomplish anything because so many people HATE America and despise him they will stop at nothing to cause mayhem. Forgiveness is a virtue, and if he is at least trying, he has my forgiveness
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 20,Jan,25 17:02 other posts 
"You want LEGAL immigration don't you?"
No I don't. I want to help real refugees, not use migrants as cheap labor.
By phart [Ignore] 20,Jan,25 17:04 other posts 
Why refugee's? They bring nothing but their hands out palms up? besides, labor is the largest single cause of our high price situation. Lower labor cost,lower cost of finished product or service.
Perhaps instead of call centers for government agencys being US bound, contract it to India, private industry does it, it works,not so well if the accent is strong,but it SAVES MONEY.
It's the economy that matters. with a weak economy, you can't help yourself or anyone else.

Let me see, a Well known democrat said, " “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country,”
Refuges come needing,wanting,and most are not capable of being a asset until educated and such.How many millionaire refugee's are you aware of?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 09:55 other posts 
It's being human to help people who are fleeing war, oppression and hunger.
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 10:21 other posts 
You are correct. BUT this is not 1930.
Folks coming here under the guise of asylum seeker, may very well be a isis operative. Many people here illegally are NOT innocent people running from oppression, they are gang members and etc. Sorting it all out takes time.
Close the border to all, sort out the mess, and when things are figured out, fixed, then asylum seekers can apply, be vetted and be admitted if they are authentic. But for now, closing the border is the smart choice. get a grip on whats going on.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 13:09 other posts 
There is still lots of war, oppression and hunger in the world.
I'm not telling you to trust all of the asylum seekers, because that's what I don't want my own government to do either.
That's different from assuming everyone is a terrorist upfront.
I'm not saying it's easy and I also don't want it to take too long.
I'm very annoyed with my government letting people wait for years.
Then they are having children in my country and I cannot send away a kid who grew up here, to a country they have never seen.

My politicians are crying about an immigration crisis, just like yours, but it is a crisis of their own design. They cut funds for immigration services and they closed too many shelters, filling up the ones remaining to the brim, annoying the people who live near them. They turn 30,000 immigrants per year into a massive crisis, because they are accumulating and not sent back, due to personnel shortages.

Meanwhile, in the Netherlands live and work almost 1 million migrant workers, mostly from Eastern Europe, who get exploited and need to live somewhere.
It's only intended to serve our agriculture business. If it actually served our economy, that would be nice, but most of it belongs to foreign investors,
who take most of the profits and leave us with the downsides.
By #714675 22,Jan,25 14:21
cheap labor? then why is your country turning them away?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Jan,25 12:48 other posts 
Who says my country is turning away cheap labor?
Just because I WANT people being treated fairly, doesn't mean my country IS.

There's around 1 million Eastern European work migrants in my country,
being exploited for cheap labor. They are not ILlegal however, because the European Union allows free travel and working anywhere.
I don't want cheap labor to compete with our own labor force, pulling down wages. When these laws were introduced, the first thing we saw is most Dutch truck drivers losing their jobs. They have been replaced with Eastern European truck drivers, mostly Poles.

There are lots of problems, so I want to regulate that more.
It doesn't even require more laws or regulations, it just requires more labor inspections, to make sure employers obey the laws that we already have.
By #714675 23,Jan,25 17:16
I prefer debating with intelligent people that believe transparency is the best way. It's good learning for both parties. It's not a point of who is right or wrong so do not forget this. I'd rather debate with intelligent and more experienced dealing with critical issues such that if I am wrong I've gained knowledge.

It takes courage and honor to win. It takes double when you lose. For example// The best chess players in the world reached grandmaster rank not by winning but the humble stoic way of absorbing as much information as they could when they lost.

I am not perfect or stubborn either. But if what I say is true there is no means of compromising. Should there be mitigation involved and I'm not aware of this mitigation I'll definately listen and reason as best as I can..

What is a Law? What is Justice? How do they differ or correspond with each other.. I'd like to hear your analysis. I'm assuming you are distracted or haven't been able to reply.. This is a very serious understanding all should be educated on with the 2 terms.
By #715906 23,Jan,25 18:10
I don't think you could have expressed this any better. Very nice essay.
By #714675 23,Jan,25 19:25
I'm being transparent, by pointing out to you what's wrong in my own country
and why I want to improve it.
It's however much worse in your country, and your solutions suck.

You are wrong by default, to think of politics as if it was a team sport.
I am a member of a very small political party. It will probably never "win" the election, to become the biggest party in my country. I have no loyalty to that party, I am supporting them, because they represent my ideas. I work with them to develop and propagate my ideas, within the party, so they can represent them in local and national politics. The party might not win a lot of seats, but the ideas are popular and gaining popularity. That's because everything the party does is based on analysis of hard-felt problems in society, explaining the causes to the people, and activating them to protest the people who are actually responsible for the problems, instead of blaming the scapegoats they are taught to blame.

We are currently helping people, who are fed-up living in a small, drafty, poorly insulted house, for a rent of $800/month, that costs $400/month in winter, to heat to some acceptable living temperature, because the landlord doesn't want fix the clogged up heating system. People are not having that problem, because of immigrants, or transgenders, or "socialism", they are getting exploited by the Housing Corporation. It's a systemic problem, because tenants all over The Netherlands are confronted with poor service and high prices. The problems started, when people voted in the most right-wing, capitalist party as the leading party in the cabinet. They privatized the social rental association, introduced the landlord levy, in 2013, which forced the new housing corporations to sell of lots of property. Much of it was sold to foreign private equity investors, that also were permitted access to our housing market, by the right-wing Minister for Housing and Government Services. In only 10 years, it resulted in massive increase in housing prices; the rent price increased 89% (9 to 17 €/m2) and the average sales-price increased by 103% ($224,000 to $454,000). Owning a home become impossible for most people, because investors were outbidding them by $50,000 to $100,000.

Now you tell me, why I'm stubborn for arguing against your unconditional support for capitalism?

You blabber away about "Law" and "Justice", while I'm trying to tell you that our
right-wingers, doing the bidding of foreign private equity investors, fucked over the Dutch people. How about that for an analysis? Can you deal with REALITY, instead of your dumb semantics discussions?
By #715906 24,Jan,25 17:08
You are typically stupid
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 25,Jan,25 07:34 other posts 
Why don't you read my comment above, about our housing prices?
What's stupid about that?

It's just one example how the Dutch people got screwed by right-wing ideas.
There are many more. It's all related to privatization.
Do you understand what that is, or do I need to explain it?

The only party who fought against that privatization, is the Socialist Party.
That's why I became a member and support them.

To clarify; I'm doing well. I have a house and a good job.
I just see how many Dutch people are not as lucky as me.
I understand what happened to them. However, I'm not just in it to help them,
but because their problems create a domino effect, that damages my country.
By #714675 24,Jan,25 00:35
Give your country cheap labor, free housing, money, shelter while making taxpayers homeless...
Why the fuck are you even talking about this. I'm a taxpayer, I voted for Trump and I won as well as 80 million LEGAL americans did.
Have them come to your country or house.. just give trump the details.. he's flying them out of the country.. have at it.
If you want illegal aliens coming to your country take some interest.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 25,Jan,25 07:50 other posts 
"Why the fuck are you even talking about this."

Because, Trump doesn't have any good solutions, because he doesn't care
about the problem. He only cares about using it, to get you lot to vote for him.

If your voting only affected your country, then that's your problem, but obviously
isn't just your problem, because your country affects the whole world.
Do we at least agree on that?
By #715906 25,Jan,25 19:11
You are braindead.. Are you sure you are not an american?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 25,Jan,25 21:18 other posts 
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 07:16 other posts 
Will YOU accept the results if things DO GET BETTER?
Simple question. Will you accept the results if inflation reduces, prices come down,and peoples lives are better in 4 years?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 10:13 other posts 
Yes, of course, but I have a whole different concept of what better is.
I do agree it's good if inflation is between 0% and 2.5%.
If unemployment stays below 5%, he's doing what he needs to do.
If prices come down and wages stay the same, that's also good.
If illegals are sent home, in an orderly fashion, that's what Trump promised.
If he keeps using H-1B visas for what they were intended for and not to replace American workers with cheap labor, then we should agree that he isn't a filthy liar.
If he doesn't create an economic crisis, that's good enough.
If he doesn't stack democracy in his favor, he would be a normal president.
If he leaves people's personal freedoms intact, he's better than I predict.
If he leaves alone public schools, social security, Medicaid and Medicare, he's OK.
If he doesn't kick people from their health insurance, not makes it far more expensive, and keeps protection against “pre-existing condition” intact, he's doing what he promised.

I also don't want him to sell out Ukraine, but I would give him credit for peace that does not leave room for Putin to take a big win and come back to win more, after he has re-armed. If he attacks Iran, Yemen or Syria, he's not the anti-war president.
If he goes to conquer or do a hostile takeover of any allied countries, he loses all credit, no matter what he achieves in your country.
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 10:27 other posts 
I have no issue with cheaper labor in exchange for citizen ship if that is possible. People coming here willing and wanting to contribute back to America in order to enjoy it's rewards.

I am hoping since Trump untied AI that it can be implemented
along with robotics and automation to eliminate some wages all together to lower cost of products.

Ukraine is a simple thing really. Give Putin the land he has obtained, the killing will stop,the war will stop. This with the stipulation that if he fires 1 bullet toward a ally again the wrath of God as in nukes will be dispatched to his door step. that's what nukes are for , to deter bullshit.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 10:42 other posts 
Not even if it pushes Americans out of their jobs?
What is that thing about The Great Replacement Theory then?
Does that only apply to Democrats doing the same?

We clearly disagree on AI. I am OK with using it for innovations, but I want to strictly regulate it, so it isn't used to spread misinformation or to increase Big Brother is watching you.

If you give Putin what he has now, he has won too much, which is a dangerous mistake. It will only increase future tensions. The doomsday clock might be back a few minutes for a while, but it will get closer to midnight the next time.
Humanity should come to an agreement to leave all the current borders alone. That's the best way to keep the peace. Trump is endangering global peace by doing imperialism again, even threatening your allies in NATO. Putin might be the #1 risk to global peace right now, but Trump is now a very close #2. The sad thing is that you don't understand that. You think the US has the right to do whatever it wants and nothing is ever your fault. That's wrong. Trump's imperialist dreams threaten everyone. And I trust him with nukes just as little as Putin.
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 11:09 other posts 
To respond to your post here and below, there was evidence of money being laundered early on but our media covered it up quickly. it may be buried really deep now, but frankly ukraine is not innocent in all this. I don't trust them any more than putin.

As for jobs here in the US, the American people have priced themselves out of work. They think they are worth to much and try to live above their means.
Let's put it another way.If you are selling a used car and you price it at 10,000 dollars. And it is only worth 5000, you are stuck with it right?
Ok so your jobs value wage wise is only about 12 bucks a hour, but you demand 24, and someone from Gaza is willing to come here and work for that 12 in exchange for citizenship, the employer is getting their job done for what it is worth. saving money ,increasing profits.
If the person from gaza in this example is educated, then that is a plus for both them and the employer because they can move up the ladder. Being we are finally going back to a merit based system instead of what color or race or xyz excuse there is at the moment for hiring expensive labor that is not qualified to make a certain group happy

Ai and automation are the future. I am thankful to have been able to be there when it was still in the future,to have written programs in basic and learn about binary,octal and hexdecimal and such,i am so glad it has grown and prospered. Of course like anything else in the wrong hands it can do harm. that is the ONLY thing that should be monitored or regulated.

Just think, someday we won't have to worry about politics, there will be a large computer bank that will replace alot of the bureaucrats, the President can just ask the computer ,"there is a fire threat in california, seed clouds over these locations to prevent it" No argueing, no fuss,no muss, the computer sends a drone into the air, seeds some clouds,it rains, all homes and lives saved. No bs, just results.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 11:42 other posts 
Your media covered it up? Fox'News' is your biggest media company and hates his guts. If you think they would cover it up, you're really losing it.
They're making up shit every day, but they would leave something real unused?

If it was true that Americans are too expensive, than why do you still have the highest GDP in the world, while simultaneously having a higher poverty rate than most of Europe?

Please don't try calculating things, it's so wrong at so many levels, it's completely useless. If the value of a job is €12/hr and people are asking €24/hr, than the job would disappear. However, the Scandinavian countries still have McDonald's, with wages double of yours. If it wasn't economically feasible, McDonald's wouldn't be there.

I'm OK with AI and automation being the future, as long as well all benefit from it, instead of only the billionaires.
I hope you still care about living in a free country. How would you like living in a surveillance state that follows your every move and punishes you for doing things they don't like, whatever that may be?
You already don't trust the media. What can you still trust, when any photo, video or audio recording can be faked, to make people believe whatever the people in power want them to believe? How do you prevent it ending up in the wrong hands? Hoping really hard?

You are supporting giving all control away to a large computer bank.
I have a good movie for you to watch: I, Robot, with Will Smith.
Maybe you'll think twice after seeing that one. It's also just a fun movie.
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 15:56 other posts 
HEY, I can support AI better than I can a democrat!
If you take the humans out of politics, you would eliminate alot of arguing and such.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 16:49 other posts 
Arguing is the point of democracy, the point of freedom.
Also, I think you would start to hate the logic of the AI very quickly.
By #714675 21,Jan,25 19:03
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 22,Jan,25 08:41 other posts 
Are you asking me to trust Clay Higgins on this issue?
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 21:32 other posts 
maybe but the logic of the past 4 years, I know was very illogical.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 22,Jan,25 09:28 other posts 
What would you say was the most illogical decision Biden made?
By phart [Ignore] 22,Jan,25 11:11 other posts 
He made alot. but signing off on renaming of military bases was a total waste of money just to shut up a few.
Rejoining the WHO at 500 million dollars instead of the 39 million that was Trumps settlement amount was Illogical and stupid.
Rejoining the paris accord was illogical. with china and others making alot of the polution that comes over us by the jet stream,it was downright DUMB.
only registered users can see external links
And AOC is worried about cow farts.


Sending billions to ukraine was illogical when it just put us at war with russia. did you hear that we have spent 200 billion MORE than all the other nato countries combined on ukraine? and there is a OCEAN between us and russia.
Just so many, those are just off the top.
By #714675 23,Jan,25 19:27
wide open borders and the closing of the keystone pipe line
By phart [Ignore] 23,Jan,25 21:22 other posts 
which oddly, Trump hasn't mentioned. I do know the emergency energy EO had in it to open up anwr but from there I aint heard about keystone.but just a quick googling indicates that Trump has mentioned it along te line somewhere.
By #714675 23,Jan,25 22:52
The keystone was the one that sent gas prices from 1.80 to over 4.00 a gallon causing everything to skyrocket. That was the real clincher then that cocksucker biden put regulations down closing down alaska and off shore drilling.
It looks like instead of Canada's oil, Trump want's Canada as a whole.
I thought Trump's fascism was limited to Project 2025, but unfortunately
he shot up directly to threatening the sovereignty of neighboring states.
"renaming of military bases" Were they named after Confederate generals or something? I would not call that a top priority, but I understand why he would do it, and why you don't like that. How do you like Trump renaming the Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America?

Show me any evidence that rejoining the WHO costed ANYTHING. If you don't remember, there was a global pandemic ongoing. Working together with other nations to track the spread of contagious diseases could have prevented or reduced the impact of Covid. If Biden spent anything, then it was for extra hospital beds, respirators, tests, the vaccine development and implementation, and equipment and materials for doctors and nurses, who were doing their best to save your friends and family.

Rejoining the Paris accord is illogical to you, because you choose to not accept that climate change is man-made and can be prevented. That's your logic problem, not Biden's logic problem. Biden is helping prevent the possible extinction of humanity. Would you even care about it, if you accepted it? Or is your thinking; I'm too old to care?

First of all sending money to Ukraine is not JUST a logical decision. Is helping an old lady who is getting mugged just a logical decision? There is logic to it, because it is not good for society if people are allowed to mug old ladies, but you do it also for sympathy towards the old lady and anger towards the mugger. Just how it has a logical part to show people mugging old ladies isn't cool, there is also a logical reason to show Russia that attacking a country that didn't attack them isn't 'cool' and to prevent them to do it to more countries, after they conquered Ukraine.

The US did not send 200 billion MORE, because you only spent $175 billion. Europe is a bit behind, because from the €241 billion in aid we committed to, €125 billion was actually allocated.

You used to care about Russia gaining influence all over the world. Remember Vietnam and Korea? Do you now not care anymore who is getting occupied under the new Soviet Union?
By phart [Ignore] 25,Jan,25 15:59 other posts 
Yes, if you go back in history, when the US wanted to build military bases they took the land from the poor southerners not that long after the civil war and gave them peanuts for it. To try to at least show a little respect to the citizens they named the bases after confederate officers. I am 58 years old and did not know the forts were named that way until it came into the news. It is totally disrespectful to the people that lost farmland and homes so the military could play war in their back yards.

Gulf of America, sounds good to me, but is it worth a damn, not really. More of a "Fuck you Mexico" is more or less what it amounts to. which, I don't mind it be said, considering all the dope that comes from that direction.
Really, would never have crossed my mind to rename it.
Fixing the Mt Mckinnly, yea, that is fine by me, a great President that lost his life while in office.
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 21:38 other posts 
why would i hate the logic? Not saying I wouldn't,not really knowing if I would but what is your thinking as to why I would hate it?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 22,Jan,25 09:41 other posts 
Because you support people being able to afford groceries,
while supporting billionaires taking all the money for themselves.
It's the fundamental flaw in all of your thinking.

If there was logic to it, your country would have the highest living standard for everyone. Instead, you have the hardest working people in the modern world, one of the highest GDP's in the modern world, but much smaller less wealthy countries beat you in every way possible. Your country is only #1 in doing capitalism, on everything that makes life worth living for normal people, your country is a straggler.

Unless you like people to suffer, for the purpose of creating absolute wealth for a tiny group of people, who are served as kings and worshiped like gods, you're politics is not logical.

If the AI god would have the goal of maximizing well-being of people
and minimizing damage to nature that supports everything and everyone,
it would immediately end capitalism and assign us all jobs that benefit humanity. It would end the consumerism we are caught in and it would probably force us to be vegetarians.

I prefer socialism, where we figure out solutions together, instead of an
AI dictator. However, following an AI dictator that is programmed for equality, is better than following wealthy dictators who are programmed to serve only themselves.
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 16:00 other posts 
Ukraine's large shadow economy represents a significant money laundering vulnerability. Conducted in cash with little records or oversight, transactions in the grey economy make it relatively easy to launder money in Ukraine and deprive the government of tax revenue.

only registered users can see external links

UH? Could it be????? PLEASE check the dates of archives that this report is included in. It was DURING OBAMA!!!
By phart [Ignore] 24,Jan,25 21:48 other posts 
as far as cheaper labor to work towards citizenship, I got to thinking, another path that could be offered to achieve citizenship in a prompt manner would be serve 2 years in the military. When discharged, you would issued a social security number and be a legal citizen.
By #714675 21,Jan,25 10:33
You just don't know what he is going to do. All he is doing now is stopping the war. He will be talking with zelenski and putin. The war should never have happened in the first place. The evidence will show Biden triggered it then used the excuse of sending Ukraine money by laundering it. Not one ukrainian saw the money.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jan,25 10:49 other posts 
No, I don't, but he is promising lots of things that I would hate.
Do you have any idea what Trump is going to do?

If Trump actually manages to put Putin back in check, without giving him a big win and a justification too do it all over again, I will praise him.

There is something I'm willing to give Putin; a guarantee that Ukraine will not be allowed in NATO. But it should come with a guarantee from Putin that he doesn't pull Ukraine in a similar pact with Russia. I am OK with Ukraine being neutral for ever.

Biden sent Ukraine weapons, medicine and food. It wasn't about money.
Do you have any evidence for the laundering money thing?
By #714675 21,Jan,25 12:22
Everything he sent was to launder money, Biden did. Beforre Biden took office there was no war. Although there was tensions with Russia taking over crimera with the Obama administration the situation was stablized and being sorted out. Then Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a special prosecuter so the money flow can continue.
Trump just got here yesterday. Once he has gone over classified details he will start getting to work. In the meanime he signed over 100 executive orders stablizing our country. Norrmally the first trip the president goes the the UK. Last term in office he went to Saudi Arabia with the deal they would by USA product for $150 Million dollars while working on the Abraham accord. Our country is in shambles and Biden left a fucking mess here. He's working on this country to stablize it economically as well as our national sovereignty. He's closed the border until further notice while cleaning out the cesspool of illegal criminals. The hollywood elites have fled the country..
As far as who is evil between Ukraine and Russia BOth parties profited from this. He will have plans to exercize using Tariffs, embargos or sanctions until it is stablized. He has the theory that everyone needs the USA, we don't need anything since our resources are right here including natural gas or oil. Our country is big enough which has tropical and artic climate zones for oil and other natural resources. There will be nothing we need from anyone. Canada and mexico are being punished with 25% tariffs mexico because of the illegal border crossings and canada because they steal our money. Justin Treudo sait it will cripple canada's economy with Trump stating if canada can't be independent sustaining itself it should consider being america's 51st state.
You said I was nuts about Greenland and Panama? You haven't been following the news. It's coming to an end and Greenlander's are open to being part of america, they are tired of Denmark.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 22,Jan,25 09:14 other posts 
So Biden is in cahoots with Putin, because the Ukraine war is a good money laundering scheme? How does that work then? Biden gets a piece of the action, when your military industrial complex sells weapons? How about Trump then? Or is selling $350 billion in weapons to the Saudis a good thing? Do I need to remind you that Osama Bin Laden en most of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudi nationals? By the way, the Bin Laden family was good friends with George Bush. The only planes flying directly after 9/11 were bringing several Bin Laden family members back to Saudi Arabia. The Bush family made a lot of money from the war that followed. They never found those WMDs that Bush fear-mongered about though.

"He will have plans to exercize using Tariffs" On Canada and Mexico,
because that's somehow related to Ukraine and Russia?
Oh, illegal border crossings, sure, sure. Here's an idea; if you don't let companies exploit illegal immigrants, you wouldn't have any illegals in your country. They need some way to feed themselves. My country has no border wall and hardly any border security. Lot's of immigrants ask for asylum, but they are not hanging around illegally. We keep them in shelters, until we either allow them in or send them back.

I have been following the news. There are only a few Greenlanders who might think it's a good idea, the rest is thinking you lot are crazy. In any case, they are citizens of Denmark and they cannot give away Denmark's territory to the US, just because they are living there. It's a democracy. It's 55,000 people against 6 million. They get massively subsidized by Denmark, by the way. The only reason for complaining is that they cannot hunt and fish on the ice anymore, because the ice is disappearing, due to climate change. That's not Denmark's fault though.
By #714675 22,Jan,25 14:23
Greenlanders want to become americans. America wants Greenland as part of their family. Denmark has pissed them off and quite frankly they would be better off. They don't have technology for resourses needed.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Jan,25 11:48 other posts 
The US will offer them NOTHING that they don't already have.
You don't even offer your own citizens ANYTHING.
The only right you want to give people is the right to work.
They can already do that now. And if they can't, Denmark provides assistance.

You're not doing it to help them, you have selfish reasons.
The biggest reason is that your dumb-ass president had a dumb idea.
By #714675 23,Jan,25 12:37
In your opinion.
When you have nothing you have nothing to lose
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Jan,25 13:00 other posts 
Who says they have nothing?
They are living on a boring piece of frozen rock,
but they can leave to Denmark anytime they want.

I've recently seen a documentary of Greenland and it's people,
you would be surprised how good they have it, besides the land itself.
They just cannot live on hunting and fishing anymore.
That's what they really want, but no one can give it back.
By #714675 23,Jan,25 13:33
Because of the permafrost they have no running water. On the other hand Yakusk Russia is colder than greenland but they have running water, cold and hot. Denmark is liberal left wing just like all of Europe except I believe in Poland. Poland is honest with NATO by contributing 5% of their GDP.
Greenland only has 50,000 people and Denmark considers them to be non-essential. Greenlanders know this. Their requests are unanswered. They trust Donald Trump. They don't trust Europe. I wouldn't trust them either.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jan,25 05:22 other posts 
In Greenland, tap water is usually produced by melt water which is either collected from freshwater lakes outside towns or directly from rivers. A small proportion of the tap water comes from the so called “reversed osmosis plant” where seawater is microfiltered with the help of membranes to desalinise the water.

Denmark subsidizes Greenland with $ 513 million annually, up from $ 330 million in 2009. That's $9000 per person. No fucking way is the US willing
to do that, just out of kindness (), that's socialism.

Strange why Poland feels the need to contribute 5% of their GDP to NATO.
I took a look at the world map, and I think I understand now.
I'm just not sure that their loyalty to NATO is as much distinct.

Trump doesn't want to "help" the Greenlanders, he wants their land. The funny thing is that Trump says climate change is a “hoax”, but him going after Greenland shows he knows it's real. When the whole of the USA, except for Alaska, is too hot for human survival, Greenland will be one of the last places where agriculture is feasible. It's also very strategically located off the coast of Russia, once all the ice of the North-pole is gone, the whole year round.
(Greenland lies at an average altitude of 1792 m above sea level)

Just how he's fantasizing what he can do with Gaza, once the Palestinians are gone, he's fantasizing what he can do with Greenland, with or without
the Greenlanders. They will work for the glory of the new U.S. empire,
once they're getting hungry.
By phart [Ignore] 25,Jan,25 08:21 other posts 
To me it is a useless rock with no economic value at all . I think we need to be ditching off shore land instead of taking in more. Give porter rico back to spain would be like calling in the pimple masher off youtube and getting some real relief.
Give gitmo to cuba and just shoot the prisoners that are left down there and leave them to rot
philippines, most of our tvs come from china now, so who ever we took them from , give them back
America can go on a diet and loose alot of flab
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jan,25 06:00 other posts 
"To me it is a useless rock with no economic value at all"
You're telling on yourself, if Trump can out-think you.
See the comment above. Do you get it now?

To be fair to you; Trump probably didn't think of it himself.
It was probably Elon's idea. He does know how to "invest" well.
By #714675 24,Jan,25 14:18
I never said anything with putin. can you read. Corruption needs a safe haven for laundering money. Ukraine is the main center. Climate change is a scam.
By #715906 24,Jan,25 17:00
I'm just so happy trump is president


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#69



Show your Genitals