Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#213|
Started by #610414 [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51
New Comment Rating: 3 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.STUFF, JUST STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 4.A Forum Topic 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Must be a big one to reach page six
It's only a big one, when Trump talks about it.
only registered users can see external links
If you don't like socialism, provide a link to a video called:
"How Capitalists Solved The Housing Crisis"
You don't need social housing, you can afford to buy.
So do I, but I still think people who are not as lucky,
deserve to live in a decent home as well.
They are a useless burden to society. It's your fault for creating them.
I'm not a lefty/socialist out of compassion alone, but because it's better for ALL OF US.
It maximizes people's potential, so they contribute to society.
Bums in cardboard boxes don't contribute anything. Well, maybe diseases.
so they could live in a nice box.
whats wrong with putting down the needle or the bottle and going to work?
whats wrong with not having kids or pets if you can't feed them>?
whats wrong with people that they think the rest of us owe people that choose to be worthless bums a damn thing?
What's wrong is your 'thinking' that those problems apply to all bums.
Your system is very good at crushing people, who do everything right.
There are many people who have no fault at all for getting crushed.
People's lives can also get crushed to rubble, AFTER having kids or pets.
Losing ones job or losing ones health is a big risk of that. No fault of them.
We should have a system who prevents occurrences like that crushing people.
The US didn't have that already, but your political side made it even worse.
There is nothing wrong with people who think we owe each other,
there is something wrong with people who think everyone is on their own.
It isn't logical and it isn't consistent with any religion.
In any case, the majority of people don't agree with you, and they will fight back.
The worse it gets before they succeed at it, the harder your side will fall.
taking away all motivation to improve 1's self by making sure the folks know they will not suffer for being lazy and non productive.
tax the rich to pay for the lazy, the rich will just leave and your system would not support it's self.
edit, i got to thinking, damn, i must be poor, i don't have access to a swimming pool.
so can i live in this cheap government housing since i can't afford a pool? wait, i can get a plastic kiddy pool from walmart so i guess i don't qualify.
what would motivate people to do better for themselves if they are living cheap off the governments taxing the "wealthy" ?
and where is the line between wealthy and living in this cheap housing? what is to stop bill gates from putting his estate into a trust and moving in?
do you have a pool cat? maybe you could move into that fancy place built on the tax payers dime?
if you don't have a pool,you are poor according to the socialist
what we as a country need to be looking at is who do we put in for 2028? we need to continue the progress we are making as Rome was not built in a day and our country was not torn apart over night. it takes time,aka years, to fix the fucks up of obama-biden, just the border crisis alone will affect us for decades as we don't know how many terrorist swam over and spoke some spanish to get a free ride to wherever
well first, they would reduce the stupid regulations that cause houses to be so expensive.
We can't use what are referred to as tiny homes in my county, zoning won't allow it. why? because the democrat led county would rather bring in sub divisions with 400,000 dollar plus homes into the area and tax them.
another thing, the bullshit laws preventing you from building your own home on your own property should be abolished. you can't even cut lumber from trees on your own land to use in your home. your home,not the countys home that taxes it.
developers push down acres of trees and burn them to make way for new houses and then import lumber to build them. the very trees they push down and burn could be made into lumber and used on the homes being built. it was done that way years ago.
but not any more. why? because dems can't collect sales tax from the lumber.
i could go on, and may add some more later. but i have a feeling common sense,back to basics solutions are not what you are looking for.
I'm NOT supporting "liberal ideas", related to housing.
"Liberal" in that sense mean exactly what you want. Liberalization of housing means: privatization and deregulation. That's exactly what our government did and which resulted in skyrocketing rent and house prices.
I'm not a liberal, I'm a socialist, I support public ownership.
That's the opposite of privatization and deregulation.
First get your terminology straight, before you discuss economic models for housing.
Right wing policies, (neo)liberal policies, privatization and deregulation,
have NEVER on any significant scale resulted in lower living costs for the public.
However, left-wing (not liberal) policies have been proven to work many times.
When governments increase public ownership, regulation, and long-term investment in housing, affordability, quality, and access tend to improve, especially for lower- and middle-income households. This has been tried and done large scale many times, all over the world, to great success.
There is overwhelming evidence that it worked in Vienna, Austria, Sweden, Singapore and The Netherlands, until the 1990s. I have lived the successes and I have seen the results of privatization and deregulation all around me.
Houses are not so expensive because of stupid regulations, houses are so expensive because it's one of the simplest way for rich people to exploit poor people, when a government privatizes and deregulates housing.
I don't THINK that my ideas the only 1's that might work.
There is just a FUCK-TON of EVIDENCE that your ideas DON'T work and mine DO.
Civilization has been building houses for a while now. Right?
All the ideas have been tried and tested, all over the world.
They just keep telling you that you need deregulation, because it makes a small group of wealthy people even more wealthy, over the backs of everyone else.
You just listen to the people who get paid to LIE FOR THEM.
you can identify it quickly if the buildings are more than a couple years old because there is trash everywhere, they are covered in graffiti ,with junk cars in the parking lot and a mobile police tower nearby.
because the people that use that housing don't work,won't work and do not take any pride in what is provided,don't appreciate it nor do they care how others feel about the way they treat what is provided for them.
if you were given a home, how would you treat it? more than likely you would keep it clean and so forth,why can't everyone?
i worked with a black man for a while and sometimes we would go into poverished areas of town while working and i finally ask him 1 day," why is all this trash laying around?" he said, "because they are poor". i pointed to a plastic grocery bag laying near a park bench and ask him how money it would cost to pick up that bag,put some loose garbage in it and place it into a city provided trash can. he suddenly couldn't answer that question. people are quick to blame their lack of funds on all kinds of issues. and for some reason folks like you tend to make it taboo to ask them why funds are relevant to taking pride in what you do have and taking care of it.
If you don't want to inform yourself about what the rest of the world does,
your worldview on this is totally skewed.
you are over there,living what apparently is a very blessed life,not a care in the world.
You could actually learn a lot, from the successes of others.
But, you would rather believe that you're the best at everything.
It's a thing that CAN work, if you don't want to change the system itself,
but it's a policy of accepting defeat to capitalism.
Wow, The Clown is really making good on his promises. NOT.
and besides, this is a side effect of the future. Automation. the good riddance of workers demanding much more than they are worth for mundane, simple repetive task that can be done by a machine
Estimates of job losses due to automation and AI vary, but some projections suggest millions of jobs could be impacted. A McKinsey & Company study suggests that between 400 and 800 million individuals globally might need to find new jobs due to automation by 2030. Goldman Sachs predicts that 300 million full-time jobs could be replaced by AI globally. While some jobs will be lost, others will be created, but the transition may require significant reskilling and adaptation.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Manufacturing:
20 million manufacturing jobs could be replaced by automation by 2030, according to PatentPC.
Global Impact:
The World Economic Forum projects that 85 million jobs could be lost due to AI and automation by 2025, but 97 million new jobs will also be created.
US Impact:
Up to 73 million US jobs are potentially at risk of being lost to automation in the next five years, according to a study cited by Edoxi.
Specific Sectors:
McKinsey predicts that up to 375 million workers globally may need to change occupations by 2030 due to automation.
AI's Role:
While some job losses are attributed to robots and other automation technologies, AI is also playing a role in job displacement, particularly in roles involving routine tasks.
Adaptation is Key:
Many sources emphasize the need for workers to adapt to the changing job market by acquiring new skills and embracing lifelong learning.
i hope the day comes when people regret ever asking for so much money, they think they can't make it now, wait until most jobs are done by automation or are done by ai. then they will really understand what it means to not be able to make it.
the next really great depression will be a permanent 1. ai and automation will take care of everything from trash collection to medical procedures. no need to pay workers comp for more than 2 or 3 people to operate and manage the company, it will run it's self.
Link your 'policies' to Biden, because you offer NO evidence that he has anything to do with what you are listing.
Why do you blame Biden for AI?
"In his first days back in office on January 23, 2025, President Trump revoked Biden’s AI regulations and signed Executive Order 14179, effectively deregulating federal oversight of AI"
🚨 Concerns & Criticisms
- Labor and consumer advocates warn that removing oversight puts worker rights and safety at risk .
- Meta’s Yann LeCun labeled the rollback a “witch hunt in academia”, fearing it drives researchers overseas.
- Federal AI body (AISI) cuts tied to the rollback could gut safety and equity efforts.
- Some analysts caution that spotty federal policy may lead to patchwork state laws, confusion, and compliance burdens.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There’s no evidence that President Biden has signed any legislation that encourages U.S. job offshoring. In fact, his proposals and enacted policies have specifically targeted the opposite"
"Here are several major Biden-era policies that have directly helped bring back jobs to the U.S.:
🏗️ Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) – Nov 2021
$550 billion in new spending on roads, bridges, broadband, EV charging, clean water, transit, ports, etc.
Funded over 60,000 projects, driving construction and forestry-related employment. Analysts found IIJA, CHIPS, and IRA together spurred factory and utility job growth across the country.
💡 CHIPS and Science Act – Aug 2022
Carved out $52 billion in grants and tax credits for U.S. semiconductor manufacturing.
Since passage:
$450 billion committed to chip and electronics manufacturing
17 new fabs, dozens of expansions across 21 states
Expected to create 125,000+ construction and manufacturing jobs, with 200+ projects already launched and 135,800 jobs projected.
🌿 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) – Aug 2022
The largest investment in clean energy in U.S. history.
Over $300 billion in private clean-energy investments announced so far; over 330,000 clean-energy jobs created; projected up to 1.5 million additional jobs over the next decade.
🇺🇸 American Rescue Plan & XR Programs
The $1.9 trillion COVID relief law helped jump-start the economy post-pandemic, accelerating the recovery.
Strengthened “Buy American” rules (raising domestic content threshold to 60–75%), directing $120 billion in federal procurement to U.S.-made goods.
🛡️ Executive Orders & Defense Production Act (DPA)
Signed executive orders boosting U.S. manufacturing (“Made in America”) to incentivize reshoring and facility revitalization.
Invoked the DPA (June 2022) to accelerate domestic clean-energy tech production (solar panels, heat pumps, grid components), leading to new manufacturing jobs in underserved communities.
📊 Impact & Job Trends
The U.S. economy added 16.6 million jobs from Biden’s inauguration through early 2025—it’s the only presidency with monthly job creation throughout its term so far.
367,000 manufacturing jobs added since January 2021—the fastest manufacturing-sector growth in nearly 30 years.
Manufacturing employment climbed to its highest level in ~15 years, with nearly 789,000 factory jobs added since Biden took office."
only registered users can see external links
"Who is the Biggest Scumbag I've Debunked?"
only registered users can see external links
Funny stuff!
Shame that Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro aren't on there.
Still 2 of the most famous and skilled grifters in the world.
But we should keep our eyes on him
"I'm not going to waste my time doing that because......bla, bla, bla".
Shades of Lyx bashing.
Oh, one more thing. Regardless of the supposedly number of times I BROKE A RULE, what does it say about you that you won't react to the above?
--------------------------------------- added after 84 seconds
You owe Bella one don’t you
And, do I owe her one? If having to endure the constant reminder from her and you that I should genuflect every time I see her pic, then, yes, I guess I owe her one.
So, Pussy Dgraff, what else? And, if you remember what you’ve just brought up, then you should also remember that I deleted every pic in mt gallery except one. From that moment, ‘my pics have been as honest as anyone else on the site.
Also, from that day on, I was a bitch with a capital B, knowing that, on this site, at least, people kiss you on the cheek while holding a hidden dagger behind their backs.
So, come on, Pussy, what else?
You know what? This? This is a waste of time where I could be doing something important. Bye, Daniel.
“And, do I owe her one? If having to endure the constant reminder from her and you that I should genuflect every time I see her pic, then, yes, I guess I owe her one.
So, Pussy Dgraff, what else? And, if you remember what you’ve just brought up, then you should also remember that I deleted every pic in mt gallery except one.”
Endure MY “constant reminder”!? Ha! I haven’t kept track of or counted the number of times, I’m sure there’s been 2 or 3, maybe more but it’s not like I make a post about do you know what TWOWARMTTS did back when? And when you use a big word why not make sure you use it properly. Genuflect? Bow every time you see my picture?
And as for you deleting all but one picture, that is the truth, HOWEVER that one picture was placing blame on me and big9inch21 * for the removal of all your gallery pictures. You were not owning any of this being “your fault” you were pointing blame on us.
In case a new or fresh eye is reading the post(s), because I ASKED admin to include a freeze vote option on voting, I would reach out to the member in question with a screenshot of the referral to show that it is legit and I pretty much write the same blurb; You/your profile has been referred to the Evaluation Panel for xxx . Please consider (I always use the word consider because it is your choice whether you want to comply OR NOT) removing xxx otherwise your profile is in jeopardy of being deleted. Please reach out to me if you have any questions.
2 or 3 of my 19 blacklisters have blacklisted me because I have reached out to them in that capacity.
* Just for point of reference when TWOWARMTTS came on the ShowYourDick/ShowYourCunt radar, we were using the original name AND big9inch21 was the king of the site.
--------------------------------------- added after 24 minutes
Oops! CORRECTION; I’ve been blacklisted by a new member so that makes 20 not 19!
This doesn't change anything. Dgraff is still a pussy and you are as obnoxious as always. Oh, yeah.
“you've brought that up in everyone of my memberships.”
IF I brought anything up it was because you had a different spin on things. You enjoy the challenge, search the Forum for just how many times the story was repeated and under what circumstance was it shared.
“And, frankly, now, I believe you do so just to justify your "please, look, I'm such a nice person" attitude. We both know you are not.”
I am confident about who I am and from my vantage point, you seem to be confused about a number of things. Oh yeah!
“ We say and do a lot of stuff on this site. Some good. some bad, but we never cross the line.”
I’ve been here 13 consecutive years and you’re right behind me with 12 years. I’ve not been booted have you? I seem to recall some stuff that happened with the ol’ “router caper”, do you remember that?
I’ve never been booted close maybe but close only counts in horse shoes and hand-grenades
--------------------------------------- added after 14 minutes
We must be her and the mouse in her panties
New Comment Go to top