What's up with the member posting as DisabilityAwareness? Frickin' EVERY DAY he deletes and then creates a new profile! Perhaps the disability is not physical. Just sayin'.....
Over the years I have noticed a number of members doing the same thing. I assume they think that a new account will get more interet without,as HotFuckerBoy suggests, needing to interact or do anything themselves.
I noticed that this particular person/member created a profile on 7/16 and now the profile reflects 7/17......
The crazy thing is, I tried to contact this member, however the member "closes chat completely", meaning he does not accept private messages at all, zero, zip, nada!
I have come across a very few people who won't accept any communication. They are entitled to do that but it does seem strange to me. Why join a 'community' then cut yourself off from it? It causes me to ponder on just how genuine the profile is.
Oh No, I really DO think that it is odd to behave in that way. It seems to me to be common courtesy to reply to any message received, if only to say 'Thank you, but I am not interested.'
In my own case any male who messages me will always get a reply. Some times this initial message leads to a longer correspondence, sometimes not.
My point was that while a member can chose just to ignore all messages I cannot understand why if they feel that way that they join SYD in the first place.
I noticed the request for comments myself and that's what prompted me to want to send a message to him. Much to my surprise, he does not accept private messages!
I posted a stern message on his page and was rewarded with four points!! --------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
...and he deleted it again,which cost me 20 points so I'm down 16 points.
One for the team. --------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
"Hey we're all sick of your bullshit. Either leave it or delete it".
From time to time, there will be a random member that decides he wants to post his picture here but it doesn't happen often. And if I my input is valued, I say NO. There's other threads where you are encouraged to post pictures but I hope it doesn't happen here. Just sayin'.
Heartbreaking...one of my favorite groups. Yes, he and Chris Cornell were very good friends, and was godfather to his son. He died on what would be Chris' birthday... So incredibly sad RIP Chester
Is it fine for a girl to post fully-dressed pics on her page from when she was under 18 (but still a teenager)? No skin showing below the neck besides her arms and below the knees. She just wanted to be sure.
You were unsure about whether pictures of people under 18 years old were acceptable?
Every time any member uploads a picture, the first page they come to clearly states what is acceptable. Point 1. and 2. are written in red and the last part speaks directly about your concern; "all should be over 18 years old at the moment of shooting."
Here's a copy and paste of the rules.
1. Posting photos of nude people under 18 years old is a criminal offence in most of countries, even if those are photos of your own body.
2. Posting nude photos of other people without their consent is a criminal offence in many countries too. No joking, you can go to prison for that. "Revenge porn" laws, identity theft laws and copyright laws are applicable.
So post only your own photos or photos of people you have their explicit permition to post, all should be over 18 years old at the moment of shooting.
Please try to cut me some slack guys... I was more drunk earlier than I am now, and I was never planning on posting pics of myself or anyone else under 18. She asked me, and I said that I would find out for her, and no, I wasn't putting thought into it at the time.
Gross. Pics of **** peeps are a nono even if they are fully clothed. My 1st impression would be pics are stolen and not them. Why would they need to post pics of themselves that young anyway? I get being unhappy with how they currently look but not to that extreme. That behavior screams ****.
Yeah, that's what I would do if I didn't care to read the site guidelines and I had a concern, I would ask the new guy that's been drinking!
Even the way you wrote the post is odd. The last sentence of your first post, you wrote; "SHE just wanted to be sure". Then when you responded to 2Kinky, you wrote; "I'll send HIM a pm"
I think he meant admin. Either way is this chick so delicate and spineless she can't ask herself? I don't get how these chicks are always asking others to ask questions or reply to posts or messages for them. Aren't they fucking adult to ask, I mean they are adult enough to make an account...
@Bella
She's obviously much newer than me, but yeah, it was a bad idea asking me, clearly. I didn't realize such a big deal would be made out of it if I asked here rather than explaining to her how to post in the forum - yeah, she's clueless.
Nothing weird about the post. 2Kinky said "I would definitely check with admin first." I said "I'll send him a PM." It's well-established that admin is a guy. His response was that it's legal, but it could send the wrong message to others. He wouldn't ban her if she posted it, but he'd recommend she take it down.
That's tempting. I considered a little "hair of the dog" much earlier in the day, but I had/have way too much to do today. Instead I decided to stick with something much healthier...
Regardless of any rules I certainly think it is VERY inappropriate to post photos of chlldren on an ADULT web site where most photos are of nude people.
Is it legal? Maybe. Is it right? NO!!!
Yeah, much appreciated... I've thought of that, quite a few times, actually. Trouble is, my decision-making skills also seem compromised when I'm drunk... I never listen to my own advice. If only I had some kind of breathalyzer that was required before posting... ;P
Yes. I saw a successful run couple of days ago in the log. If I remember correctly, two consecutive members got 30 points each and then the chain failed.
I think it's mainly used to suspend the report for 24 hours so that reported member can be contacted and asked to remove the il-legal or internet pics from their page. In those 24 hours the member can't be deleted nor can you make a vote.
I love it when members contact us asking to verify them. We say "sure" and ask for a verification pic. Then we never hear from the member again. Really, you contacted us bitch. It has happened at least with 5 different female members in the last month. I just wonder how many of the female profiles are the husband, boyfriend, or ex posting the girls pics and she has no idea. If your asking for verification, I would think it would be a simple request to send us a pic if they were really who they say they are. Just saying.
I assume these people contact a large number of members hoping to get immediate uncomplicated verification. Do you ask for some form of proof of who these people claim to be? Because i do and often when I have suggested what they provide the proof I never hear from them again. Not even a message to say 'Thanks but I have now been verified.'
Yes we ask for a specific pic. Usually a pic of themselves with our name and the date. Either written on a piece of paper or written on their body. What ever they choose. But we always ask them to show our name not theirs.
It's right in the instructions of how to get verified. If they found you the list, then they were reading what to. I took this picture and then found a handful of people I am friends with and sent them a nice PM asking them to consider verifying me. All responded within a few hours and verified me. I found it really easy, but I read the directions first. I guess some people make it hard, or as was said, they are not who they are claiming to be.
I do something not too dissimilar. It does seem to put people off. In fact a while ago a member got quite worked up because I was asking for real proof.
I have to admit that having a minimum membership period before verification seems possible, but then length of membership offers proof of longevity not honesty.
However, in the end although it could be argued that verification offers few benefits if I verify someone I am saying that I believe that they are who they say they are. If I am not convinced of that, it is my obligation to decline to do so. The onus is on the member asking to be verified to offer proof.
I mean that they have to show longevity before you consider asking for proof of their honesty. You're right, longevity only proves that either they are that person or that they are a good deceiver.
I just reread admins' guidance on verification he talks about having met the person or skyping. I have never done either of those but it is an indication of how seriously he takes verification.
They are trolling for verification. Probably men. They know that if they ask enough people some may verify them without verification pic. Or without giving it much though at all. Since they pose as females men often "turn off" their brains for them.
This site is very eye-opening about nature of people if you know where to look. Though I was aware of this technique before, it's typical method of "social hacking".
What one should learn from this is that people always find a way to cheat the system and some other people always fall for cheating. And that's why totalitarian governments "for the people" will never work the way socialists imagine.
The crazy thing is, I tried to contact this member, however the member "closes chat completely", meaning he does not accept private messages at all, zero, zip, nada!
It's kinda like SYD members who declare they are straight and will accept comments/votes from other SYD members but don't message them!
In my own case any male who messages me will always get a reply. Some times this initial message leads to a longer correspondence, sometimes not.
My point was that while a member can chose just to ignore all messages I cannot understand why if they feel that way that they join SYD in the first place.
The "first" upload is 22:39 on 21,Jul,17!
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
...and he deleted it again,which cost me 20 points so I'm down 16 points.
One for the team.
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
"Hey we're all sick of your bullshit. Either leave it or delete it".
And we all chanted; kebmo!kebmo!kebmo!
R.I.P.
Every time any member uploads a picture, the first page they come to clearly states what is acceptable. Point 1. and 2. are written in red and the last part speaks directly about your concern; "all should be over 18 years old at the moment of shooting."
Here's a copy and paste of the rules.
1. Posting photos of nude people under 18 years old is a criminal offence in most of countries, even if those are photos of your own body.
2. Posting nude photos of other people without their consent is a criminal offence in many countries too. No joking, you can go to prison for that. "Revenge porn" laws, identity theft laws and copyright laws are applicable.
So post only your own photos or photos of people you have their explicit permition to post, all should be over 18 years old at the moment of shooting.
Even the way you wrote the post is odd. The last sentence of your first post, you wrote; "SHE just wanted to be sure". Then when you responded to 2Kinky, you wrote; "I'll send HIM a pm"
She's obviously much newer than me, but yeah, it was a bad idea asking me, clearly. I didn't realize such a big deal would be made out of it if I asked here rather than explaining to her how to post in the forum - yeah, she's clueless.
Nothing weird about the post. 2Kinky said "I would definitely check with admin first." I said "I'll send him a PM." It's well-established that admin is a guy. His response was that it's legal, but it could send the wrong message to others. He wouldn't ban her if she posted it, but he'd recommend she take it down.
Is it legal? Maybe. Is it right? NO!!!
Don't those people have the slightest idea about the rules?
[deleted image]
So you thought that this random topic was the perfect opportunity for you to slip in your dick pic?
Gotcha!
[deleted image]
...what? How did that get there? Oops, oh well, lost my train of thought now
However, in the end although it could be argued that verification offers few benefits if I verify someone I am saying that I believe that they are who they say they are. If I am not convinced of that, it is my obligation to decline to do so. The onus is on the member asking to be verified to offer proof.
This site is very eye-opening about nature of people if you know where to look. Though I was aware of this technique before, it's typical method of "social hacking".
What one should learn from this is that people always find a way to cheat the system and some other people always fall for cheating. And that's why totalitarian governments "for the people" will never work the way socialists imagine.
New Comment Go to top