The real reason is to (1) shut down porn sites altogether; (2) slut-shame sex workers; and most of all (3) distract from the violence and non-consensual sex on Facebook. The far-right Christian fundamentalist organization that destroyed PornHub based their case on just 118 instances of c***d a**** that they found in the last 3 years, while during this time Facebook had 84 million instances (not 188 thousand - just 11

[rhymes with "mild" and "misuse", I don't know if these words are banned here - see the Buzzfeed articles.]
Then the New York Times took up the crusade, which is what is finally lead to the credit card companies shutting off porn sites, with exploitative, slut-shaming articles that encouraged destroying the lives of porn performers, by promoting the idea that society should ruin the families, careers and homes of women performers whose real names get leaked (on the grounds that making porn is - by the Times' reasoning - a shameful, sick perversion.) Meanwhile the Times articles used lewd, suggestive and misogynist wording and photos to concoct its own variety of scandal-porn for misogynist puritans.